| Author |
camera function of 7650 Nokia,how can take so poor qualitiy pictures? |
muratti54
Joined: Dec 05, 2001
Posts: 29
From: Austria
PM |
compare to qualitiy pictures which taken by cameraMCA-20,do you belive in the near future will be a Newsoftware which can improve the quality of taking pictures with 7650???hopefully!!! |
|
|
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
There is one SW already, that makes the photos clearer and better (CameraFX) and surely there will be more SW:s for that purpose.
I've noticed that mca-20 produces better quality photos when the conditions are good (daylight, outdoors), while the 7650 performs at its best under poorer conditions (poor lights, indoors, close ups).
But still, none of these are even close to a real digicam.
They are "fun to have gadgets", and as such devices they both are really great. Both have their ups and downs, mca-20 good pics under good conditions, and 7650 great quality for on screen view and fairly good over all photos, even during poor conditions.
|
jplacson
Joined: Apr 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
The 7650 may perform better than the MCA-20 under poor conditions, but that doesn't make the photos it takes good at all! :s neither one of them is really useful in poor lighting...so I'd consider both of them useless in clubs, bars, discos, etc... so my only use would be in good light... the beach, outdoors, vacation spots... and the MCA-20 performs better in those situations. |
manuela
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 110
From: Austria
PM |
I never compare the cam of 7650 digital camera even not with analog camera,just comparing with MCA20 camera they are in way in a same class to compare,I have both of them,I compared almost in every condition good light outdoor indoor,in everycase makes SE camera better picture,maybe bit in the dark makes 7650 better but all in all,not clear the pictures specialy side of the frames are extreamly bad
which I can never understand how can Nokia produice that camera after MCA-20 they should know that everybody gonna compare both with eachothers,as first Mobile camera MCA 20 has to be normaly not so good,which comes afterwards as new model,they should always make better then the older one!!!
I have read a bout a software CF for making pictures with 10*zoom some effects etc,I would love to see some pictures which is taken with a new software,so we can all compare
do you believe guys in the near future will be newsoftware for 7650 from NOKIA directly which can improve the qualitiy ? |
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
It can't be all that bad, the 7650.
I actually made a photo of my friend (close up, indoors), and printed it on photo paper. She sent it along with her passport application,
and it was accepted 
So, now she has a photo made with a 7650 in her passport
A bit "cool" |
manuela
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 110
From: Austria
PM |
pictures are breezy not clear,as passphoto sure looks okay cause the picture is an a small size,so we wont see all the details |
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
http://www.pbase.com/john74/inbox ive got photos in here from MCA-10 MCA-20 and 7650...please lets not forget that we have a mobile phone and not a digital camera...cmon lighten up a little if you want high quality photos then the price would be 1500 euro for the 7650 so would you buy it???NO!!!! @froddan ive sent you some photos to your e-mail address from the sudden rains here in Athens!!!!
|
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
look at this photo taken with the normal 7650... http://www.pbase.com/image/3952967 not bad!!!
|
muratti54
Joined: Dec 05, 2001
Posts: 29
From: Austria
PM |
Johny74 ,you were telling in your post that with new CF software it possible to take picture better then old software,can you show us please with newsoftware but with a Big size,so we can compare the difference!!!! |
manuela
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 110
From: Austria
PM |
Johny74, why dont you wanna undrestand that we are not comparing 7650 Nokias camera with a digital camera!!!as Muratti says WE DO COMPARE WITH SE CAMERA!!! BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH CAMERAS MADE FOR MOBILE PHONES!!!right U got it!!! |
Deltayoda
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Los Angeles, California
PM |
What I would like is a Digital Camera and be able to connect via my T68i through bluetooth, so I can send high resolution images to someone.
I'm not sure if they have Digital Camera like this, but I would love it.
I know there is one with Wi-Fi, but show me a phone with Wi-Fi
|
boysaint
Joined: Mar 26, 2002
Posts: 111
PM |
passport pictures taken by 7650???? i have seen many pictures taken by a nokia 7650 under various lighting condition and never saw a shot which would pass as acceptable for a passport picture! a passport is a serious document. here in our country that pic by 7650 will never be accepted. but for fun pictures only...no problem. yes, it shouldn't be compared to pro cameras, or the higher end digital cameras. come on... we all know the difference! |
boysaint
Joined: Mar 26, 2002
Posts: 111
PM |
...and yes, maybe improving the pictures taken by the built-in cameras mean using more expensive lenses, which will not only increase market price but also increase weight.
these built-in cameras were mainly there just for fun, quick references, pics sent thru MMS, or other lower-priority purposes. hence it cannot be compared with pro digital units. these cameras are models all by their own class. |
manuela
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 110
From: Austria
PM |
BOYSAINT, let me ask you where did you get idea that we are comparing 7650 with digital camera?dont U read posts propely?I AM GONNA TELL IT FOR THE LAST TIME!!!LISEN MY FRIEND!! WE DO COMPARE THE CAMERA FUNCTION OF 7650 with MCA-20 okay!!! U GOT IT??WHICH MEANS BOTH ARE MADE FOR MOBILE PHONES OKAY U GOT IT??!!THEY ARE IN THE SAME CLASS!!!AND THE POINT IS MCA20 makes much better pictures then 7650!!! I hope and pray that U will understand what we ment all!!! |
|
|
Posted: 2002-08-18 13:58
