| Author |
SE T68i/mca-20 Communicam vs. Nokia 7650 |
mfo
Joined: Feb 12, 2002
Posts: 32
From: Philadelphia, USA
PM, WWW
|
I have posted a comparison between the MCA-20 Communicam and the built-in camera in the Nokia 7650.
You wil find it here:
http://mobile.burn.com/review.jsp?Id=82
The Communicam take better pics by a mile....
-Michael
http://www.mobileburn.com/
|
|
|
Drago
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Posts: 66
From: Sweden
PM |
Nice pics with the mca-20. Now I want one again! |
lookman
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Posts: 27
From: Melbourne, Au
PM |
Woww!!
What a nice review....... |
jorg47
Joined: May 02, 2002
Posts: 54
PM, WWW
|
Thanks!!!
Most of NOKIA 7650 users don´t know that but...SONYERICSSON´S GREATEST!!!
www.t68.no.sapo.pt |
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
guys the review looks ok but ive got both the mca-20 and T68i and the 7650 and trust me the 7650 takes better photos than the one in the web site......the quality on both the mca-20 and the 7650 are the same its the viewfinder on the 7650 which is heaps better but photo quality are the same the 7650- from time to time tend to have blurs around the edges but the colors are 24bit (24 million colors)so trust me if you leave me you e-mails i will find some time to send you guys some 7650 and mca-20 photos ok??Or how can i upload them in esato??Through which site?
|
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
the truth is that the 7650 takes better close up photos than the mca-20 but the long distance one then the MCA-20 is a bit better in that section
|
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
the 7650 camera has 3 resolutions to choose from,BASIC,NORMAL and HIGH the HIGH option takes great photos!!!
|
mfo
Joined: Feb 12, 2002
Posts: 32
From: Philadelphia, USA
PM, WWW
|
Well, I have them both too - and what you see is exactly what came out of my 7650.
Maybe mine is defective. Could be. But those photos are not retouched.
Both cameras are 24 bit to the best of my knowledge, but that has little to do with focus or poor white balance.
The Nokia manual states that the 7650 camera is "optimized for a distance of 1.5 meters", but I don't see much optimization.
I just retook two images on each of the devices - after cleaning the 7650 lens (or the glass that covers it).
New page added with those images:
http://mobile.burn.com/review.jsp?Page=10&Id=82
-Michael
http://www.mobileburn.com/
|
captainsm
Joined: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
No question about it, 7650 sucks
MCA-20 Rocks !
 |
mfo
Joined: Feb 12, 2002
Posts: 32
From: Philadelphia, USA
PM, WWW
|
Bah. Why must so many people be polarized on this kinda thing?
The 7650 does not suck. It is an awesome device. I like it better than my t68i, in fact.
But it is not perfect. No device is....
-Michael
http://www.mobileburn.com/
|
captainsm
Joined: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
I'm not polarized.. just biased.. hehe
The pics does prove my point though.. |
lesneo
Joined: Jan 19, 2002
Posts: 482
PM |
Hey Michael,
just a note to thank you for the wonderful and informative reviews on the "Mobile Burn" website.
Indeed you are the envy of many of us, whose only satisfaction about gadgets is reading reviews from guys like you.
Once again, thanks, Michael. Keep up the good work. |
|
|
Posted: 2002-08-07 17:13
