| Author |
Samsung D600 v SE k750/w800 |
solidsingh
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: india
PM |
which one is better out of those, i think the d600 by miles
|
|
|
Yanosh94
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: 341
From: Paris France
PM |
I just know d600 have much resolution screen but can they put memory card ???
Hello everybody and sorry for my mistakes in english it's because in am just a little french student  |
crisnash02
Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Posts: 38
From: South Devon, UK
PM |
Hmmm, this has been puzzling me too.
The d600 has a bigger,better screen, transflash slot (only 512mb max tho) and the big feature in CIF Video (320x240) at staggering qulaity, although, it has no autofocus, probably less intergrated bluetooth, and in my opionion a boring and fiddly menu system. Oh and the 750 will have a lot longer battery life than a samsung. But then again Samsung build quality is spot on.......grrr i cant decide. If the d600 has a equla or better camera to the k750, im definatly getting it!!!
Lol not much help!! |
Evil Eye
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Pune, Maharashtra, India
PM |
D600.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
Yanosh94
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: 341
From: Paris France
PM |
What is boring and fiddly in easier english please
Hello everybody and sorry for my mistakes in english it's because in am just a little french student |
solidsingh
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: india
PM |
boring is less fun and fiddly is hard to use, the d600 may not be li mited to 512 transflash, its just that 512 is the biggest t flash card made yet. when the 1gb card comes out it should work in the d600, the d600 is waaaaaaaay better that k750, it has an awesome screen res, excellent cam, 352 x 288 video which is amaaaaaazing and look how small and light it is
|
Yanosh94
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: 341
From: Paris France
PM |
Thanks.yes samsung menu are too bad. It is a big advantage for samsung the cif video but its normal they have put them because qcif are too little in qvga screen. But what is the other advantage of the samsung ??? It is only the screen ???
Hello everybody and sorry for my mistakes in english it's because in am just a little french student |
solidsingh
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: india
PM |
it has a tv output
|
DCUK7
Joined: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool, UK
PM |
I have to admit, Samsung has outdone a lot of the competition with this phone! I have seen the TV Output and it is incredible for a phone!!!
Even its PDF reader app is decent for a phone! The only real downside is the transflash card! |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
i checked d600 today, nothing special imo i am really not an se fan, but rather k750i then that south korean wonder-weapon... not to forget the samsung support...
|
swiZZ
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Posts: 81
From: France
PM |
If u just comparing the d600 with the k750/w800... there is no hesitation. I'd go for the d600. It can view office documents and has a better screen. I am definitely getting the d600E as soon as it's available for faster datarates.
N6610
Samsung t100 -> s500 -> s300i
Sanyo s750
SE t68i -> t610 -> k700i -> p910i -9> m600i |
$hé®îNghÀm3:16
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 379
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-11-03 00:36:00, swiZZ wrote:
If u just comparing the d600 with the k750/w800... there is no hesitation. I'd go for the d600. It can view office documents and has a better screen. I am definitely getting the d600E as soon as it's available for faster datarates.
|
|
Office documents!! 
Serious?
They more or less seem the same phone. I prefer snapping pictures with the k750, loudspeaker is supposed to be miles ahead of sonyericssons, although my friend has it and hers is slightly louder, but not what some are making out.
The whole office thing, would sway my decision towards the d600. Hows the mp3 function on the d600... if its better then the k750's it must be one hell of a phone.
Still the k750 is unique!! |
numb
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/samsung-d600-en.shtml |
Nebbs
Joined: Jul 04, 2005
Posts: 145
From: Newcastle, UK
PM |
How can you even compare them, the 750 is six months older than the D600 and we all know that 6 months in the mobile phone market is a lifetime. In another few months lets raise this thread up again and say "W900i or D600"...then another six months "D700 or W900i" and so on and so forth. |
dts-phile
Joined: Dec 04, 2004
Posts: 189
PM, WWW
|
As for me, D600 has less arguments... Screen is not really much better, camera is crap, menus are, indeed,boring and not customisable, sound quality is just average...
The back of the D600 will take you back to 1998: it is ugly and pure plastic...
Build qulity on the whole is... plastic.
Network sensibility is not reliable, it is good, but not as good as SE. You can only view pdf, doc and excel files on D600, which is OK but definitely not the final solution. I guess that it is made from a Java app. It is called "Picsel Viewer" and my little finger tells me that one day or the other we'll get it for sure on our SEs, an improved version.
Samsung service is crap as well...
On the plus side: wonderful MP3 Player (just for the graphics, sound is definitely better in k750i), exceptionnal video quality (go here and see for yourself: you'll be in awe: http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]/d600photosite/video-0001.3gp) and a nice dual speaker (though not necessary at all).
But the upcoming W900 is really much more advanced to my mind. Samsung sell expensive cellphones that don't deserve it... A lot of people have had a Samsung model and won't get back to Samsung (see for yourself in other forums).
Picture of the back panel (looks like a 1998 model...)
DTS-PHILE (Nice, France)
The DTS Surround Sound Passion
http://www.dts-phile.com |
|
|
Posted: 2005-04-29 17:54
