Esato

Forum > General discussions > Other manufacturers > D500 or V3 RAZR?

Visitors browsing this topic: 1
Add to Bookmarks
12  Next
Author D500 or V3 RAZR?
methylated_spirit
P900 no flip
Joined: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bonnie Scotland
PM
Posted: 2005-03-01 22:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Whats better? Looking at camera, ease of use, design, storage. I reckon the V3 is better on most counts, though the D500 is a good phone. Does the D500 have a memory card slot?

_________________
Hello, Scroto!

[ This Message was edited by: methylated_spirit on 2005-03-01 22:05 ]
tombadier
K800 Brown
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: 397
From: Derbyshire, UK
PM
Posted: 2005-03-01 23:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I had a V3 and have used a D500.
I reckon the D500 is better.

Better Camera - 1.3MP compared to 640 x 480
Lots more memory - 96MB compared to 8MB (None have memory slots)
I prefer the Samsung menu system - very easy to use
Both phones look amazing!

Both are great phones but having had a V3 I would go for the D500


_________________
7610 AND SONY PSP!!

Ebay Refs:
http://feedback.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=tombadier&ssPageName=STRK:ME:UFS

[ This Message was edited by: tombadier on 2005-03-01 22:23 ]
jeko.uk
W810 white
Joined: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: south east london
PM
Posted: 2005-03-01 23:34
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
ive got a D500 and not had 1 problem with it
Stinger151
T68 grey
Joined: Aug 08, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM
Posted: 2005-03-01 23:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
D500 is a superb phone never had any probs with it.
262k colour screen, 1.3 megapixel camera, 86mb memory.
small
EastCoastStar
S700
Joined: Dec 07, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: orlando fl US
PM
Posted: 2005-03-02 00:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
well... the v3 looks real good... but the d500 has many more great specs!
p900 lover
W960
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London
PM
Posted: 2005-03-02 00:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i already started a topic on this, have a look

http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=80143

i myself thing the D500 is much better, better screen, camera, looks
bart
Ericsson T68
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-03-02 00:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
V3 not worth it appart from being a good fashion phone.
D500 if you are blind and have no patience then you'll get it. haha
With Ericsson and Nokia gone: we must keep their spirits alive and buy JOLLA or YOTA
govigov
K500
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM
Posted: 2005-03-02 05:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i will go for V3... i just hate samsungs.... if not for that, i wud have taken the d500 for the better cam....
EastCoastStar
S700
Joined: Dec 07, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: orlando fl US
PM
Posted: 2005-03-02 05:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i saw the d500 for the first time in my life last saturday. (actually, i saw the p910, k500, k700i, s700 and s710 (color), and a few more that i cant remember off the top of my head), but the d500 didnt look appealing to me... idk... not my thing... but neither is the v3... but i love the v3 looks, no matter what anyone says
i was gonna start a thread about what is saw for the first time... but... i figured it wasnt that big of a deal to everyone else here and i figured it would get locked and deleteddddd
Its good to be back!
knight4led
W810 black
Joined: May 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Califonia, USA
PM
Posted: 2005-03-02 07:33
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
where did you see all of these phones in one place? I rarely see any of those in the US
clank
W810 black
Joined: Sep 24, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-03-02 11:47
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
V3 is a gimmick...it has 6mb or something memory which makes it unusable...is that what multimedia phones are supposed to be??
whizkidd
W950 Blue
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-03-02 11:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
D500 anytime.

This message was posted from a T230

k4m!k4ze
W710 Violet
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: CBE
PM
Posted: 2005-03-02 12:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
D500 of course ! 1.3 mpx cam, 98 MB memory

imo V3 is a bit overpriced
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence of your attempt !!
TheWhizz_68
Apple iPhone 4S
Joined: Oct 19, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2005-03-02 12:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Didn't like the D500 at all , cheap build and a horrid menu system, not a great fan of the V3 either but would take it over the D500.
ThreeX
T68 grey
Joined: Dec 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2005-03-02 15:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2005-03-02 11:47:01, clank wrote:
V3 is a gimmick...it has 6mb or something memory which makes it unusable...is that what multimedia phones are supposed to be??


I think you´ve got it wrong. Who said the V3 is a multimedia phone?
Moto would be totally retarded to market it as one.
It´s a basic phone where the expenses went into materials used (alu and glass displays) and absolutely brilliant phone features.
Happy owner of: Ericsson GH198, S868, SH888, R310s, T10s, T28s, A2618s, T39m x2, T68m, T66, SE t68i, T610, S700i, Nokia 2110i, 6210, 8310, 8850, 8890 and 6680 Siemens S55
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi