| Author |
Best SE camera phone? |
howque
Joined: Jan 31, 2002
Posts: 64
PM |
Well, in my opinion, its the mca-25 communicam. I got my t630 a month ago and the pictures taken fm its camera still \"shrinks\" and pixelated like the t610. I used my old t68i and camera attachment to take the same subject. Guess what? When i transfered to my t630, it wap far more better and sharper. No pixelation at all! Damn, if only the communicam works with t630! Can anyone tell me if the k700i has the same shrinking pixelated effect in its camera? Thanks.
This message was posted from a T630 |
|
|
drachrich
Joined: Feb 19, 2003
Posts: 36
From: philippines
PM |
It has to be the S700...1.3 megapixel men!!!! |
Ne0
Joined: Mar 06, 2002
Posts: 353
From: Arendal, Norway
PM |
The K700i has the same resolution as the MCA-25. I don't know if the quality is any better...
Nokia DISconnecting people SonyEricsson F**King with people Motorola HURTing people  Your face, your ass...what's the diffrence! |
boto43
Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Trnava-Nitra,Pardubice CSSR
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-09-02 13:13:20, drachrich wrote:
It has to be the S700...1.3 megapixel men!!!!
|
|
Yes the best  camera will be.
ja cejtim se bejt esatem sk podvedenej  |
petrutms
Joined: Nov 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Cluj Napoca, Romania
PM |
s700. the best. and maybe p1000 next year.
|
MikLSP
Joined: Sep 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: se-nse.com
PM |
Strictly speaking the title of your thread rules out your nomination as the mca-25 is not a "camera phone" 
The S700 will blow the rest away though. Next best at the moment is K700 but obviously that's not including any of the Japanese SEs
|
Wazuki
Joined: Aug 08, 2004
Posts: 280
PM |
If including them, I believe its NOT-REMEMBERING-ITS-NAME japanese phone that has two cameras, each- 3.4 MPix or sumthing.
This message was posted from a T630 |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
At present (Q3) of 2004 it will still definitely be the SE K700/i . . . Well how 'bout that of the SE P910? I just have no idea here . . . |
|
|
Posted: 2004-09-02 12:58
