| Author |
Man faces federal charges of having child pornography on a cell phone |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
A Waterloo man faces federal charges of having child pornography on a cell phone.
Prosecutors say it may be one of the first cases of its kind in Iowa.
Twenty-year-old Justin Van Dyke is charged with one count of possession of child pornography. According to the indictment filed this week, Van Dyke had child porn on his cell phone which had picture viewing and storing capabilities.
Assistant US Attorney Ian Thornhill says it's the first case he can recall. He declined further comment on the case.
A hearing is scheduled for August 26 in US District Court in Cedar Rapids.
The charge carries a sentence of up to ten years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
[addsig] |
|
|
thebman919
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: 140
From: Limassol, Cyprus, My Computer
PM |
WoW.  Wat a perv. if it was regular pornography i would understand though 
[ This Message was edited by: thebman919 on 2004-08-21 17:52 ] |
Atlis
Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: European Union
PM, WWW
|
That's ok, if it was child porn. But in on other hand, he was stupid to let s1 to reveal it.
This message was posted from a K700i |
50Cent
Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: ...whatever psycho!!!
PM |
how exactly did the authoritys find out?
Trusted Trader: 50Cent (+6, -0)
|
GreatDane
Joined: Feb 12, 2004
Posts: 168
From: The Real OC, CA
PM |
The guy was only 20, so even if he had a girlfriend that was 17, and they were her pictures, then it would still be counted as child pornography
|
Atlis
Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: European Union
PM, WWW
|
I have no idea about their law, in SVK is limit under 18. But still, as I said and Twista added - how?
This message was posted from a K700i |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Kinda strange situation here mates  What if it happened that the one caught is a family man, and have multiple 'nude' images of his kids, say aged 3-8, bathing in the comfort room  Images just taken for fun let's suppose here  . . . I guess in the very near future, there will be some laws implemented in various nations restricting the owners of celfones with cam with regards on the proper way of using/handling it  |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
Dodgey!
This message was posted from a Z600 |
Residentevil
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Raccoon City, USA
PM, WWW
|
Law in US is. No sex or sexual images with persons under 18. So you guys in the UK are all guilty already.  Even if the underage person agrees and there is no victim an adult can be held accountable with "statutory rape" and sentenced. Happened to an adult (30+)female teacher who had sex with a 14 year old. He like it, too. On their second offense she got canned for 7 years.
Sexual images of persons under 18 is a big no no. You are in trouble even if you have no clue how you got that stuff.
_________________
Life is short eat dessert first
[ This Message was edited by: Residentevil on 2004-08-22 05:26 ] |
boto43
Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Trnava-Nitra,Pardubice CSSR
PM |
No offence to you Atlis ,but I think you should know what a secret service main task is. Searching and searching. ;-)
This message was posted from a T610 |
|
|
Posted: 2004-08-21 18:02
