Author |
Worse image quality t630 |
Beltazor Joined: Aug 13, 2004 Posts: 18 PM |
Is it normal on t630 that the camera is very bad?
This message was posted from a T630 |
|
masseur Joined: Jan 03, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Sydney, London PM |
I guess its all you can expect from a 288x352 pixel resolution camera, i.e. 0.1 megapixel
_________________
...Unless I'm very much mistaken
my K700 review
[ This Message was edited by: masseur on 2004-08-16 15:51 ] |
shyam335 Joined: May 25, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: 127.0.0.1 PM |
Dont use 640*480 resolution,its just interpolation,it degrades quality. Well,you cant expect wonders from a 0.1mp cif cam as our masseur said
This message was posted from a T610 |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
Its a cam for fun, dont forget it. A joke is the xxl pic size imho.
This message was posted from a T630 |
Ayush Joined: Sep 12, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Hyderabad, india PM |
Bob, r u sure it's xxl and not 'xl' ?
Ayush  |
Beltazor Joined: Aug 13, 2004 Posts: 18 PM |
Thanks! I like my T630 very much. The cam isn't very important for me, so it does'nt matter anyway;)
This message was posted from a T630 |
boto43 Joined: Nov 23, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Trnava-Nitra,Pardubice CSSR PM |
Yes,camera is not any miracle. Try to buy a camera if you wanna take a picture.
This message was posted from a T610 |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
So this thread was for nothing?
This message was posted from a T630 |
rrojas260 Joined: Dec 13, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Valencia, Venezuela PM, WWW
|
A medium quality camera is at least 30 times better than the camera in the T610, i allways tought that my t610 had a good camera but i brought a 3.3mp digital camera and wow! thats diference!
|
|