| Author |
mca20 vs n7650? |
DarthVader
Joined: May 30, 2002
Posts: 54
From: Sweden
PM |
Well not exactly match between them, but i noticed that they compare pictures taken with the mca-20 and the nokia 7650. Check it out for yourselves! Maybe someone can translate?
http://www.mobilmania.cz/Mobilnitelefony/AR.asp?ARI=102382&CHID=6&EXPS=&EXPA= |
|
|
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
well i know that the 7650 has 24 bit colors,and i wish i knew how to read Czech  ive got to admit the 7650 looks great but its the size im worried about
|
mrNoodles
Joined: Feb 28, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Havent MCA-20 24bit color depth?
|
Lusipher
Joined: Dec 11, 2001
Posts: 333
From: Norway
PM |
the picture quality doesnt mind me...
even if the camera is 5 megapixel i wont carry a mobile wich yust happen to weight the double of my T68i Lunar, looks like a garage(with slide doors) and has a battery time wich simply yust sucks!
What should I do with a mobile I cant use beacause if i do ill got to carry my charger?
And when I show my friends my new finish hardware to my friend they say: Wooooow you got a nokia, and the display works!
nothing to do about...
Intel Pentium4 2.53ghz "Northwood"
MSI 845pe max2
Ati Radeon 9700pro
Twinmos DDR 512mb @ 333mhz |
mrNoodles
Joined: Feb 28, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
|
mixin
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Notts, UK
PM, WWW
|
are the MCA-20 photos on the left or right?
cos the ones on the left are a bit blurry 
|
DarthVader
Joined: May 30, 2002
Posts: 54
From: Sweden
PM |
The ones to the right is taken with a MCA-20! |
jas
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: 240
PM |
Yes, the photos to the right are definitely MCA-20. It is obvious if you follow the link to the review of the "SonyEricssonCommunicam". There you can find the right column.
I think MCA-20 images look _much_ better than the Nokia ones, which are blurry.
I wonder if the guy who took the photos didn't know how to handle the Nokia phone properly, or if the Nokia simply is that crappy.
It is also evident that the MCA-20 images have some kind of distortion around sharp edges. JPEG images that are compressed hard always gives some artifacts, but normally those images will come out smoother. Maybe there is a bug in the MCA-20 software that craps up the high frequency image content?
In any case, the MCA-20 images are much better than the Nokia ones!
I might buy a MCA-20 tomorrow...
-Jas |
oskar
Joined: Mar 18, 2002
Posts: 173
From:
PM |
I'm so happy!! I can actually understand some things.. =)
Czech is a hard language to learn and i haven't studied that much, but i'm really happy that i at least can understand something..
|
SilveR.
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
explian to ous what is going on the their sjat  |
oskar
Joined: Mar 18, 2002
Posts: 173
From:
PM |
Well..
As you already understood the pictures on the left are from the Nokia and the pictures on the right from the CommuniCam..
An interesting thing could be their "plus and miuns" in the end..
+ Symbian operating system
+ Good quality color display
+ E-mail client
– Low quality pictures from the digital camera
– No connection by cable
– Bluetooth without headset profile
|
mixin
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Notts, UK
PM, WWW
|
so cool, if the quality of the MCA-20 is better than the 7650, surely the P800 should be better aswell 
|
mrNoodles
Joined: Feb 28, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Agree - P800 will rock everything!! 
|
|
|
Posted: 2002-06-07 23:10
ink p800:: 
urple t630:: 
