| Author |
T230 better than 6610? |
Atlis
Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: European Union
PM, WWW
|
My space bar is ok, I have pda guys... not tiny display of phone 
And this reminds me that keybord of 6610 is far better than T230...
I wouldn't buy any of these two phones... they are for children...
no cellphone... |
|
|
Ayush
Joined: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Hyderabad, india
PM |
No it isnt worth the money i guess! @atlis u have a pda still space problem?? 
Ayush  |
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
I beg to disagree the T230s keyboard is far better. The 6610s was too slippery for me. The tactile feel of the T230s keypad is great. And yes these phones are not for children. These are for people who cannot afford expensive phones. Everyone one cant buy a P900
This message was posted from a WAP device |
shyam335
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: 127.0.0.1
PM |
Interesting talk,but you cant forget the fact as whizkidd said t230 is low end and 6610 is mid end .
This message was posted from a T610 |
Atlis
Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: European Union
PM, WWW
|
Shyam - yes, that's true - there's also difference between age of these phones and categorisation of phones to Mid, Low or High End...
no cellphone... |
shyam335
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: 127.0.0.1
PM |
True,but consider the prices also.
This message was posted from a T610 |
Atlis
Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: European Union
PM, WWW
|
Yes price is reasonable, but I would rather compare T310 to 6610 than T230. T310 has worse display and no radio but has better irda, mms... and is also cheaper.
no cellphone... |
Andrew21
Joined: Sep 17, 2003
Posts: 207
PM |
For me is better than T300. |
dj_wolfinstein
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: 382
PM |
Ok well here are some practical issues when comparing T-230 with Nokia 6610..!
1) T-230 outdoes the screen of 6610 in colour resolution but lacks complete sharpness as viewed on the 6610.
2) Everybody here mentioned that the Ir-Da port is crippled..Here is something you all forgot..Nokia's Ir-da does not communicate with the other brand of phones having Ir-da..I tried to send a picture from the 6610 to a T-610 and it did not even find the device..but when I sent a photo from T-610 the Damn! phone gladly received it..!
3) Nokia's Poly tones sound so damn crappy..Reason is that they are 8 Chord-16 Chord..whereas T-230 has 32 Chord Poly Tones...
4) The Voice clarity of T-230 surpasses that of 6610 which does not convey clear voice..Experiment done in the DTC-(Delhi Transport Corp) Bus Service during Peak traffic time..with all noise and horns blazing...
5) 6610 has an amazing Battery backup as compared with the t-230 But then SE has always had bad battery backups as compared with Nokia.
6)Reception is almost equal par..But here I would give Nokia the advantage..!
All in All T-230 and Nokia 6610 are great phones but I term them in equal category..Nokia 6610 was a super Flop model in India..whereas T-230 is the market leader for 5000 and below category..!
(Colour Display Models Only Under Rs.5000-Not comparing with Nokia 3310/3315/1100/2100..lol)
2 pegs of whisky-Rs500,4 shots of Tequila-Rs1000,6 cans of Beer-Rs300,Driving home a Girl who has drank all this-PRICELESS |
Andrew21
Joined: Sep 17, 2003
Posts: 207
PM |
All  has better screen that NOkia. I have looked picetures screen of N6230 and it was crap. |
bart
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
|
T230 nice small phone, good menu, fast enough, great value for money (here it costs 90euro)
the 6610 cost alot more (here 170euro) for that amount of money you can better buy a T610 (here its 179euro with free flash  )
the 6610i on the other hand well thats a great phone... lol joking.
6610i is one of the worst cam phones ever. just puch the cam button and you lose 1/3 of your screen, go to portait mode and ques what you've got 1/2 of your screen as vieuwfinder lol. 6610 is a bad phone and they didn't make it a better one by adding a poor cam.
With Ericsson and Nokia gone: we must keep their spirits alive and buy JOLLA or YOTA |
Andrew21
Joined: Sep 17, 2003
Posts: 207
PM |
@bart it's cheap in my country it cost 145euro  |
Ayush
Joined: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Hyderabad, india
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-07-20 16:23:09, dj_wolfinstein wrote:
Ok well here are some practical issues when comparing T-230 with Nokia 6610..!
1) T-230 outdoes the screen of 6610 in colour resolution but lacks complete sharpness as viewed on the 6610.
|
|
And how do u say that?? Did u know both phones exact no. of colors??? I.e., 4096. Only the 6610 has a bigger display (128*128) whereas the t230 has only 101*80. I am no Nokia fan, but fact is 6610 has much better display.
Ayush |
four
Joined: Jul 13, 2004
Posts: 96
From: London - the one in England (i
PM |
if i were you id just buy a 6600 or a 6230 of even better a k700 and get it over and done with...hehe
Wie komme ich am besten zum Bahnhof? |
bart
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
|
for a phone that has no cam. a 101*80 sized screen is more then enough. (or when its a clamshell 128*128 is recomanded)
for cam you'll need a minium of 128*160
With Ericsson and Nokia gone: we must keep their spirits alive and buy JOLLA or YOTA |
|
|
Posted: 2004-07-20 08:19
