| Author |
BT Class 1 and 2 |
Turistapt
Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Posts: 110
From: Aveiro
PM |
What is the real differences between BT Class 1 and 2, dispite the ?
Thankīs! |
|
|
kimcheeboi
Joined: Dec 19, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Abducted by hot blondes to Les
PM |
isnt one 10m range and the other 100m range??
[addsig] |
Lynx69
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: [ENGLAND]
PM |
Its either that or the fact of the general specs are better?
 >>*Wow 2100+ posts*<< |
Jezzaj
Joined: Apr 16, 2003
Posts: 321
From: UK
PM |
my ,thats a nice avatar lynx  |
Lynx69
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: [ENGLAND]
PM |
I know....its just *Magical*  Yours is the best one
>>*Wow 2100+ posts*<< |
bico
Joined: May 19, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden.
PM, WWW
|
BT class 1 gives you up to appr. 100 m. rated range while BT class 2 gives you up to appr. 10 m. rated range.
|
Lynx69
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: [ENGLAND]
PM |
Oh, thats the answer, but its useless because the phone will have to have better range for it to work 100M. Do a search because it had been discussed many time.
>>*Wow 2100+ posts*<< |
Turistapt
Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Posts: 110
From: Aveiro
PM |
Thankīs iīm seeing Class 1 itīs better thinking in the future, on other periphericals with BT to the PC! |
kinc
Joined: May 15, 2004
Posts: 226
From: Bh,England
PM |
Have any firms got plans to implement BT into tv's stereos etc? Could be fun turning your next door neighbours telly and radio on and off 
_________________
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers-- Picasso
[ This Message was edited by: kinc on 2004-05-22 18:37 ] |
Lynx69
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: [ENGLAND]
PM |
There is Toshiba launches Bluetooth Clothes Washer/Dryer
>>*Wow 2100+ posts*<< |
Turistapt
Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Posts: 110
From: Aveiro
PM |
I bought one Class 1 BT receiverr USB iīm very satisfied!!
For anyone with doubts like i was check the site http://www.palowireless.com/bluetooth/ itīs all there!!
|
buckle247
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK: OXON
PM, WWW
|
will be good when phones start to use BT1, be much easier to bluejack people as you will have a much bigger range.
|
bico
Joined: May 19, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden.
PM, WWW
|
Doesn't both ends of a Bluetooth communication, for example a mobile phone and a personal computer, need to be of the same Bluetooth class?
Doesn't either both ends need to be of class 1 or both ends need to be of class 2? Or are the two classes fully compatible with eachother? If so, if one end is of class 1 and one end is of class 2, what is the resulting approximate communicating range?
I haven't read the Bluetooth specification...
|
Turistapt
Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Posts: 110
From: Aveiro
PM |
You can connect an Class2 to an Class 1 thereīs no problem! But for bluejacking Class 2 is real limitative, with mobiles with Class 1 the fun will be assured!! |
ESTOR
Joined: Apr 20, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Singapore
PM |
==========
Doesn't both ends of a Bluetooth communication, for example a mobile phone and a personal computer, need to be of the same Bluetooth class?
Doesn't either both ends need to be of class 1 or both ends need to be of class 2? Or are the two classes fully compatible with eachother? If so, if one end is of class 1 and one end is of class 2, what is the resulting approximate communicating range?
==========
They are compatible. You get the lesser range of the two devices, i.e. 10m . So you are wasting your money on a class 1 unless you have at least two class 1 devices, or you expect to have 2 soon.
Or in the case of Bluejacking, you don't expect to(and can't) receive anything from the other class 2 device.
[ This Message was edited by: ESTOR on 2004-05-27 00:06 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2004-05-21 22:40
>>*Wow 2100+ posts*<< 
