| Author |
samsung t100 - yes or no? |
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
yeah why did the chicken cross the road?????????What happen to the T-100 topic???  |
|
|
mhorton
Joined: Jan 13, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
Laffen closed it. Not sure why really
|
x-daemon
Joined: May 02, 2002
Posts: 232
From: Istanbul, Turkiye
PM |
i would not recomment samsung t100, instead wait for v100
 | P800 |
lor
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Planet Bob
PM |
i wouldn't recommend it
cause ericsson has better phones at the moment
and i think she's a sony ericsson type of girl
cause nokia is too fancy and she's special
yes.
[addsig] |
JohnM
Joined: Jan 06, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Burton-on-Trent , UK
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-05-24 06:45, jax_rayden wrote:
the sagem my x-5 is better and has all the t68 features.
|
|
Doesn't have better screen either, 256 colours like T68(i)
Trusted trader. |
allexdos
Joined: Feb 11, 2002
Posts: 184
PM |
Buy buy T100 if you dont want bluetooth/GPRS and tirband. Much better screen, better design and more masculine that T68i |
wiltonson
Joined: Apr 12, 2002
Posts: 52
PM |
T100 is no good. cos it's magic wont live for long.
if you think T100 is good, then wait for the nokia 7210. if you dunt like 7210 design, then watch out for samsung S100 - 16 bit color screen |
belmulletman
Joined: Jan 19, 2002
Posts: 60
PM |
JOHNM,
The T100, has a far better screen. It has 4,096 colours and is crystal clear screen!!!!! Check the facts befor you post crap!!!!
Sure it might not have as many features, but screw it, it's faster!,
I have a T68m and Ohhh my god is it slow!
B-man |
waizz
Joined: May 04, 2002
Posts: 27
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-06-11 01:03, belmulletman wrote:
JOHNM,
The T100, has a far better screen. It has 4,096 colours and is crystal clear screen!!!!! Check the facts befor you post crap!!!!
Sure it might not have as many features, but screw it, it's faster!,
I have a T68m and Ohhh my god is it slow!
|
|
Read JOHNMs post right and you'll see he was talking about the sagem. Plz tone down the attitude.
Btw, did u get an update for your t68m? It should be much faster afterwards.
=========
wAi C. |
mhorton
Joined: Jan 13, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
Now I'm thinking no wait for the V100.
|
allexdos
Joined: Feb 11, 2002
Posts: 184
PM |
The t100 has a wicked screen, any better is useless for normal operations! Menues especally are way faster than T68 and overall it is much cooler to use. It is a matter of taste and depends what you want. If you just want superior connnectivity you go for the T68. When attempting to revert back to T68 from T100, my eyes seemed to be looking at a black and white screen the difference is that significant! T68 screen is out of date!
7210 is kewl but a bit big and gay colour scheme and looks cheap to me and features i aint gonna use but its a good fone on paper at least. It aint available yet, but when its out i may swap. |
Deltayoda
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Los Angeles, California
PM |
Belmulletman, he meant the Sagem, not the T100. Please read previous posts carefully before making a fool of your self.
In either case, the T100 has a very poor battery life (hmm, I wonder why it comes with 2 extra batteries? Hah!). Two hours talk time is just not enough for me (I use my phone more often than that a day), plus it looks VERY odd when open and in use. I would really prefer the Nokia 7210 over this phone, even if the V100 comes out.
Although, as much as I like the features of the coming V100, I just completely dislike the flip-flop design of this phone (Although, looks nice closed).
|
brownjs
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: 222
From: scotland
PM, WWW
|
are we all not loyal SE fans?
t100 sucks to tri-band,gprs,bluetooth ok it has amazing screen (but does more colours on a mobile really matter ,256 colours is more than adequate infact exellent)and werne't mobiles invented to talk to people?
7210 looks suck and the keypad looks crap and definetly will not be as good as t68 or z700
8910 is a total waste of money and has outof date features colour screen?
7650 is too heavy ,big and if we won,t a digital camera we will buy a sony not this brick
p800 i would not really call a mobile ( aren't new mobiles suppose to weigh and be same size as 8210) but as it has digi camera , image viewers ,word % spreadsheet viewer i would say this PDA is a rival t0 9210 |
allexdos
Joined: Feb 11, 2002
Posts: 184
PM |
T68's screen is crap for digital camera and background pics. If you dont want colour you should go for a T66. If the T68 didnt have a colour screen, it would definitely not to so well. Given that, it fails when compared to the T100's screen. Most people dont give a damn about bluetooth/gprs etc n want a good looking fone with few bugs, fast sms and menus and storng basic features. under these grounds, the t100 may be better than a t68 for the non-data user!
People get excited about wallpapers, screensaves etc but the screen is shit! U will never get a good quality pic on the fone! Bundling it with a digital camera is good, but not when the screen is so shit for viewing and quality for mms viewing of pics is shit.
If the T100 had a camera, it would fit the purpose better!
|
allexdos
Joined: Feb 11, 2002
Posts: 184
PM |
T68 is still one of the best fones by far, but not if you want colour flip phone or a just a phone that surprises you buy its vivid colours! Try it and see for yourselves! |
|
|
Posted: 2002-05-31 00:38
| P800
