Author |
T66/T100 |
allexdos Joined: Feb 11, 2002 Posts: 184 PM |
Hi guys,
I have a challenge for you guys:
T66 and T100, which one and why?
Assume triband operation is unecessary |
|
mixin Joined: Jan 26, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: Notts, UK PM, WWW
|
T66
1. cos its tiny
2. cos its ericsson
3. cos it has great features
4. fast sms speed
|
Epedemic Joined: Dec 28, 2001 Posts: > 500 From: Denmark, Copenhagen PM |
wtf is a t100?
|
Cytech Joined: Feb 19, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: Stockholm, Sweden PM |
T100.. it's a Samsung phone...
 |
allexdos Joined: Feb 11, 2002 Posts: 184 PM |
This forum is ultra bias toward ericsson/sonyericsson products. An answer to this question would be accurate if a neutral consumer were to answer!!! |
aznkrazy55 Joined: Mar 08, 2002 Posts: 31 From: Cali, USA PM |
im a neutral consumer that has a t68m... but from looking at the T100.... shoot.. i would get the T100... just look at those colors!!
________________________
w0ot  |
Fingers Joined: Jan 29, 2002 Posts: 468 From: New Zealand PM |
I'd go for the T66, but only because the battery time on the T100 is crap, about 60 hours standby according to the Samsung website, you'd have to carry your charger with you |
luguff Joined: Jan 17, 2002 Posts: 68 PM |
You're not really looking at the same type of phones.
I would understand your question if you were considering T68 and T100, but with T66 you don't get a fully featured phone. It's tiny. That's it.
I'd recommend the T68, that's what I have and it's the best phone I've ever seen, and I've been testing quite a few different phones. |
dimitrivd Joined: Apr 15, 2002 Posts: 298 From: Belgium (Lokeren) PM, WWW
|
check out this battle:
T68i versus T100
http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/samsung/t100/colorshoot.htm

[ This Message was edited by: dimitrivd on 2002-05-21 14:15 ] |
Phon-Buk-i Joined: Mar 31, 2002 Posts: 23 From: UK PM |
You can't really compare the S t100 and SE T68. The t100 doesn't even have GPRS or camera, colour screen and no GPRS(whats that all about?). Mind you the T66 doesn't even have GPRS either!!!!
In my opinion the T65 or the T68I/M are better. The T65 has a large screen with GPRS!!! and the T68I/M has a colour screen, attachable camera with almost everything else apart from of course the kitchen sink!  |
dazmcc Joined: Apr 28, 2002 Posts: 121 From: east mids,uk PM |
The screen on the T100 is amazing,as are the screen savers,it wipes the floor with the t68. but thats it!its almost completely featureless no bluetooth,gprs,mms,camera add on,wap2.0 etc.the handset is also ugly and uncomfortable to use. samsung mobiles also have a huge question mark over reliability,the gorgeous TFT probably wont last long!
[ This Message was edited by: dazmcc on 2002-05-22 19:36 ] |
3.1415926 Joined: Mar 15, 2002 Posts: 236 From: Finland PM |
The T100 has kinda nothing but colors, it doesn't even support GPRS, but on the other hand neither does T66 but it still is smaller |
Phon-Buk-i Joined: Mar 31, 2002 Posts: 23 From: UK PM |
Yeah! I just said that, copycat  |
SilveR. Joined: May 03, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
Anyway, Samsungs t100 standby and talk time suxs real..
|
dimitrivd Joined: Apr 15, 2002 Posts: 298 From: Belgium (Lokeren) PM, WWW
|
The T100 is gonna sell, because most of the mobile phone users don't need bleutooth, gprs, Camera, ...
The color screen is something where you can show off with, bleutooth, gprs, wap 2.0, a dumb nokia user don't understand all that. |
|