| Author |
Ohhhh nice :) |
jh67
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: denmark
PM, WWW
|
Super G > No problem  I like talking about other brands too.
I quite like 7210, as I also told earlier,..its very different in design, sort of "daring",..think it will sell good.
And its got nice features.
But as You say yourself,..T68m/i and 7210 are not really meant for the same users.
T68m is classic in metallic colors,..T68i is more "spacey"/future-like, but still not a so called "fashion/trend-model".
With older high-end Ericsson models, they were "business-phones" only,..but the T68m/i divides people more,..it can be used by business-people, and the younger more fashion-focused users.
The businessman/pioneer wants the features,..the younger user will mostly go for the colorscreen and small size/good looks.
So T68 is a mix of these things,..thats why its so hard to beat in "clean-cut" competition,..its got almost every feature available, in just ONE phone.
Nokia seems to be on a different strategy,..they divide their features into several phones,..some have color-display, some have bluetooth, and so on.
The 6310i is the closest compeditor,..its got the tripleband now,..all it needs is the colorscreen...and it could use a "newer/bit smaller" design too I used to have the 6210,..nice phone too 
(I have actually made, just for fun, a newer smaller version of the 6310 with colorscreen,..and no, its not the one on my website, its another one).
The 7210 has all it takes to be a trendy/fashion phone,..exchangeable covers, lots of colors, small size and very nice features as well.
Jan
| |
|
Rooivalk
Joined: Jan 14, 2002
Posts: 34
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-04-04 15:01, Raptor wrote:
Well, one thing is shure, I will never get that Nokia phone, it's even uglier than 8310, lokks like an "exploded chrismas three"
|
|
Well said. That phone really sucks.
Designed by Andy Warhol.
...And i was very very drunk when i designed this phone...  | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2002-04-05 16:14
