| Author |
question about 7650 and p800 |
Powa
Joined: Dec 25, 2001
Posts: 120
From: Canada
PM |
is nokia 7650 tri-band? and when it release?
same with p800, i knew it will release like on September, but is it a tri-band too? | |
|
Cytech
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM |
 P800 is triband. Nokia 7650, which is said to be released Q2 2002, is only dual band
[ This Message was edited by: Cytech on 2002-03-26 08:00 ] |
mhorton
Joined: Jan 13, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
I'm sure they will release a 7690... For all you people that want to go to America and Canada
|
boysaint
Joined: Mar 26, 2002
Posts: 111
PM |
is this a Nokia 7650 versus a Sony-Ericsson P800 forum? well, i'll get a P800, of course. P800 looks like a toy? i'll get a P800. the keypad on the P800 looks frail? well, i'll definitely get a P800! the P800 design looks plastic and weak? i'll definitely get a P800!
bottom line is that.... we're all so tired of nokias now. nokias are okay, but for using it for sometime makes me sick at looking at its logo. besides, nokia has nothing compared to ericsson's technology. ericsson started it all!... ring tone composer? GPRS? e-mail capability? colored screen? indiglo screen? triple band? too many to mention.... all originated from the ericsson phones.
it's not even "nokia- the past, ericsson- the future"
it is: ericsson the past, present, and definitely the future. |
tcp/ip
Joined: Mar 06, 2002
Posts: 44
From: Denmark
PM |
Yes boysaint and AMEN to that !!
|
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yea, e-son got a lot of nice features. But what good are they, when not working properly. My T68 has been nothing more than problems since I bought it. 4 sw upgrades, twice replaced, still same problems. Turns it self off, hangs up, misses calls when using gprs, can't find network when full coverage on others, the list is endless.... This was my last e-son, that's for sure.
This post was posted from a T68 |
jack078
Joined: Mar 10, 2002
Posts: 187
From: toronto
PM, WWW
|
i understand your thought.
Im having the same problems with you almost...
even you have the most advance tech., but not confident.... why release it?? eg. the T68m, didn't have the features as it announced, still rushed them out. and now... many of us having the T68 without MMS, Photoalbum.. etc
what the heck is that for customer service?
all of us who brought T68 were tricked for sure!! who wants to have a "demo" phone gotta wait for upgrading to full version?????
damnit |
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
Quote:
| is this a Nokia 7650 versus a Sony-Ericsson P800 forum? |
|
No.
Quote:
| bottom line is that.... we're all so tired of nokias now. nokias are okay, but for using it for sometime makes me sick at looking at its logo. besides, nokia has nothing compared to ericsson's technology. ericsson started it all!... ring tone composer? GPRS? e-mail capability? colored screen? indiglo screen? triple band? too many to mention.... all originated from the ericsson phones. |
|
You, alone, might be tired. But I'm definitely not 
You say Ericsson started it all. I must disagree with that. Nokia started smart messaging (ringtone download, picture sending, etc)... and given the success of this small but terrific enhancement, EMS was developped, because other manufacturers lacked it.
Email capability... Well, do you remember the communicator? Probably not. This was the first device allowing mobile internet, fax, email etc.
GPRS: as far as I know, Motorola was the first manufacturer to provide GPRS mobile phones. Certainly not Ericsson.
Color screen: about small devices, Trium and a small Taiwanese manufacturer came before Ericsson. Nokia came before Ericsson also, with the 9210 (note that I'm talking about GSM market).
Triple band: I must refer again to Motorola, and of also Siemens. Before Ericsson. Nokia had a worldphone as well, not triband, but really, do you care that much, as long as it offers global roaming 
You also forgot, that we have mobile phones as they are now, because Nokia understood first the importance of a nice design combined with technology. Most (not all, but most) of the people don't buy technology, they buy a phone with a good look. Ericsson finally came up last year with an attractive phone, which conspicuously looks like a 8210. Siemens, Nokia or Motorola would have released one like this instead of Ericsson, I'm sure you'd be holding one in your hand right now
A bit of truth never hurts!
The future is a tough multi manufacturer competition which will lead to more exciting devices!
|
boysaint
Joined: Mar 26, 2002
Posts: 111
PM |
the fact that there are a lot of nokia people snooping in here at the ericsson site is an indication that they are admiring ericssons.
i have been using nokias before, but moved to ericssons. nokia communicator wasn't really marketed as a normal cellphone-size model with those capabilities, like a t68. so it cannot fall in there. any other so-called innovator designs were also even lighted up (i'll refrain from using "stolen") from the ericsson design desk. our discussion may go on further by saying that korean samsung and other japanese brands started many other features. but being succesful is one point. i revert back to my nokias, from time to time, just to see if i am missing something. but its OS hangs up on me often. well, all the functions on my ericssons work well. all the problems i have read at the forum doesn't happen to me and my network. btw, some of the problems must be caused by our network service. but here in my country everything works well with ericssons.
okay, sorry, i didnt really mean to fume the nokias. i guess they are really sensitive. but now i know (and wonder why) they are snooping in here.
have a nice day to all.
|
mixin
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Notts, UK
PM, WWW
|
Boysaint, why are you refering to people by which make of phone they like??? It is possible that people can like different brands. I personally do not have a favourite mobile phone maker. I know that all companies have made good features in thier phones.
Its a fact that nokia have a wider audience, so they have to make more (less advanced) models, to cope with the demand. Ericsson however can make more elite models, because thier target audience isnt as vast.
Again i revert back to a point i have made in earlier posts.
"Would you buy a T68 if it had the nokia logo on it???"
|
jh67
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: denmark
PM, WWW
|
Super G > Right,...basically a lot of different phone-manufacturers have been innovative in some way,..doing new things. Its not just SE or Nokia. One shouldnt forget that
MixiN > You already know that I aggree with You
We have talked about this before.
I dont "measure" people from what phone they use either.
As You say, most phone-manufacturers have some nice phones in their series of models.
I'm more into features, design, service, than "name of the phone".
Some manufacturers are good at one thing, others good at another thing. And they are also on different strategies, so a lot of times, its hard to directly "compare" their models, and say which is the best.
With the 7650 and P-800, I like both, think they are quite nice, and will surely try both. I might go for one of them, but dont know which one yet.
Jan
|
lor
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Planet Bob
PM |
The p800 for me, because of it's tri band features. But that's the only deciding factor as of now. If nokia released the 7650 tri band, anything could happen.
[addsig] | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2002-03-26 07:49
