| Author |
Funny thing about the p800 phonelock!!! |
cdcjr
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Posts: 99
PM |
Hi there everybody!
Have you noticed if you used 0 or 9 as the first digit of your lock code it would not appear as an asterisk but as the digit itself,( unlike the 1, 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, they would appear as an asterisk ) TRY it and see for yourself. Well, that’s life!!! 
| |
|
dazbradbury
Joined: Nov 24, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK - Derby/London
PM, WWW
|
Because of emergency numbers... |
skjalg
Joined: Dec 08, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: B$rum, Norway
PM, WWW
|
Hehe, well... guess that isn`t obvious for everybody then (I thought it was) |
wapt
Joined: Jan 10, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
112, 08 and 911.
This message was posted from a R520 |
Fahed_2000
Joined: Feb 12, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK - London
PM, WWW
|
2 bad 999 doesn't work
Good Shit, Bad Shit, It's all Shit |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-03-18 03:59, Fahed_2000 wrote:
2 bad 999 doesn't work
|
|
yeah... I guess there are a lot of poms (sorry English people) who don't know about the international emergency numbers.
999 was always a bad choice in the UK, especially in the old days of rotary dial phones. 9 was the second longest number for the person to dial as it took so long for the dial to return to the position where you could dial the next number... and you had to do that 3 times! Not what you want in an emergency!
When mobile phones came and people didn't lock their keypads often numbers were called (and still are) by mistake while in pockets etc. Its very likely if the number accidentally dialled is 9 there is a good choice that it will be dialled multiple times. An emergency number of different digits is always a better choice IMGO.
| |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2003-03-17 18:14
