| Author |
Sony Xperia Rumours 2016 |
ascariss
Joined: Apr 06, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2016-01-04 14:22:23, Jamzy wrote:
I just hope sony gets their front and back cameras nailed this time...
I really dont think they should've jumped to 23/25MP but instead made a larger sensor that performs better in low light
+1. Full manual mode would also be appreciated. |
|
|
bronxdude
Joined: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
any news about android M update? |
penguino
Joined: Apr 05, 2015
Posts: 221
PM |
On 2016-01-04 14:22:23, Jamzy wrote:
I really dont think they should've jumped to 23/25MP but instead made a larger sensor that performs better in low light
IMX300 is a pretty big sensor, the one in new Nexuses is exactly the same size and they perform great in low light even without OIS. |
blackzeros
Joined: Jul 21, 2015
Posts: 381
PM |
i wonder what sony will do about camera they use the same sensor z1 to z4 i doubt they will change the sensor , but if rumors are true about lg and samsung they will use 1/2 and 1/1.7 inch sensors.they can obliterate sony with ois,better software ,wider aperture and a lot bigger sensor pixels...
future is 8k maybe they use 1.0 um pixels and 33 mpx sensor to record 8k video but sd820 hasnt 8k support so it's impossible for now i guess maybe @2017...
|
Jamzy
Joined: Jun 24, 2015
Posts: 143
PM |
On 2016-01-04 14:53:13, ascariss wrote:
On 2016-01-04 14:22:23, Jamzy wrote:
I just hope sony gets their front and back cameras nailed this time...
I really dont think they should've jumped to 23/25MP but instead made a larger sensor that performs better in low light
+1. Full manual mode would also be appreciated.
The Nexus sensor has a larger pixel size from what i understand.
And on another note Samsung are said to be fabricating their own customer 1/2" sensor at 12MP which should in theory do even better in low light. Providing rumours are true. |
JohnnyNr.5
Joined: Jun 19, 2012
Posts: 357
PM |
^
If the recent leaked specs (by evleaks) of the S7(edge) are true then Sony has to deliver an outstanding and designed from the scratch Z6 to compete with Samsung. I really hope for Sony they don't make the mistake to present an "updated" Z5 as Z6. |
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
@Ricky D,
Please update main post ... it's now 2016 - time to get on that coffee to wakeup from partying!
|AppleTV2|iPhone 12Mini 256GB|iPad Pro 256GB| Previously ...  K750|Z500|Z520|K700|K790i|K850i, :Ericsson: T18z|T28World|T36m x3|T68m (Ericsson, not the rebranded T68i). |
Ricky D
Joined: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK (living in Beijing)
PM, WWW
|
I want to start a new rating system that is more representative of the rumour and the source. The object being to remove the subjectiveness of the XR system.
Tell me what you guys think.
Esato Rating (ER#)
Rating = Source Reliability + Rumour Credibility
Source Reliability
+0 - The source has never leaked info or has only ever leaked false info
+1 - The source has a patchy record of leaks, some hits but mostly misses
+2 - The sources has mostly correct info but sometimes get it wrong
+3 - The source is never wrong. The metaphorical horses mouth.
Rumour Credibility
+0 - Is absolutely ridiculous eg. "Sony to release a handset for felines with large paw shaped buttons and a loose thread of wool in the lanyard loop.
+1 - Is plausible but unlikely or the rumour has been floating for a looong time but never come yet eg. The true Ultra successor
+2 - Is probable and/or likely and generally believed to be existence. This could be leaks from different sources on different sites stating roughly the same info.
The total score would still be out of 5, but has more clarity and definition.
I have a dig bick
You read that wrong |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
But a ER1 could be either plausible or patchy. What about modeling it on the IP format. e.g ER12 = Patchy but Probable ER32 = Reliable and Plausible.
|
Ricky D
Joined: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK (living in Beijing)
PM, WWW
|
ER1 could be a plausible idea from a pathological liar or patchy source, silly idea.
I have a dig bick
You read that wrong |
Xajel
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bahrain
PM |
On 2016-01-05 09:34:26, Ricky D wrote:
ER1 could be a plausible idea from a pathological liar or patchy source, silly idea.
I agree with goldenface regarding the IPxx like rating so we can distinguish the rumor from source.. the only other way I can see is Unix/Linux permissions as the number can't have two meanings but it's hard to understand actually, IPxx is much easier
So if we see something like ER30, then Sony must have been brainwashed to think like that.. and if it like ER32 then it's something like ( Sony Mobile will not be sold )
The problem with the previous one is that if the Rumour was like 4, we can assume it's either ER31, ER22, or even ER40 ( as if Kaz him self said so after drinking too much Sake or Shōchū )
|
nikola1970
Joined: Dec 31, 2013
Posts: 331
PM |
I think, instead of ER0 it should be:
nodarsixar
ER1
ER2
ER3
|
nightwing369
Joined: Mar 18, 2013
Posts: 415
PM |
I prefer Roman numerals:
V: Without a doubt fake/source has never been proven.
X: Quite unlikely/source has never been proven.
XV: Unlikely/source rarely correct.
XX: Possible/source occasionally correct.
XV: Very likely/source mostly correct.
XXX: All but confirmed by our Bro, Kaz, himself/source has been taken down by Sony themselves due to complete leak or source has full leak, undiscovered by Sony, yet...
Check this for the latest on the upcoming Sony phones for 2013: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AreyfktYnDHtdHN0bVFPdUFJd0ZiNzZQcjMwV1I5M0E#gid=0 |
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
On 2016-01-05 08:10:11, Ricky D wrote:
I want to start a new rating system that is more representative of the rumour and the source. The object being to remove the subjectiveness of the XR system.
Tell me what you guys think.
Esato Rating (ER#)
Rating = Source Reliability + Rumour Credibility
Source Reliability
+0 - The source has never leaked info or has only ever leaked false info
+1 - The source has a patchy record of leaks, some hits but mostly misses
+2 - The sources has mostly correct info but sometimes get it wrong
+3 - The source is never wrong. The metaphorical horses mouth.
Rumour Credibility
+0 - Is absolutely ridiculous eg. "Sony to release a handset for felines with large paw shaped buttons and a loose thread of wool in the lanyard loop.
+1 - Is plausible but unlikely or the rumour has been floating for a looong time but never come yet eg. The true Ultra successor
+2 - Is probable and/or likely and generally believed to be existence. This could be leaks from different sources on different sites stating roughly the same info.
The total score would still be out of 5, but has more clarity and definition.
Some corrections regardless of the rating denominations you use.
+0 - The source has never leaked info or has only ever leaked false info
^ if the source has never leaked info = You'd not have ANYTHING to post about  savvy?
+1 - The source has a patchy record of leaks, some hits but mostly misses
"patchy" coming from an I.T. working background, "Patch" means to fix or resolve issues/bugs. maybe "sketchy" would be better?
|AppleTV2|iPhone 12Mini 256GB|iPad Pro 256GB| Previously ... K750|Z500|Z520|K700|K790i|K850i, :Ericsson: T18z|T28World|T36m x3|T68m (Ericsson, not the rebranded T68i). |
king-james
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: M.I.A.M.I
PM |
CES http://www.ustream.tv/sony
[ This Message was edited by: king-james on 2016-01-06 02:01 ] like.no.other |
|
|
Posted: 2016-01-04 14:53
K750|Z500|Z520|K700|K790i|K850i, :Ericsson: T18z|T28World|T36m x3|T68m (Ericsson, not the rebranded 
