| Author |
Nokia 8390 vs Sony T68i - Nokia better? |
usurp
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Posts: 16
PM, WWW
|
i was over at powerpage.org and i read a article by this guy comparing nokia 8390 with the SE t68i and the guy had balls to say the nokia was better. here is the link to the site, u can also post comments underneath it without registering or anything...
http://www.powerpage.org/story.lasso?newsID=10626
ps: interdigitate is me
home: 12" ibook, G3 700, 640MB RAM, 20GB HD
work: Quicksilver Powermac G4 733, 1.5GB RAM, 140GB HD, Sony 21" screen
right pocket: 20GB ipod with Bang & Olufsen earphones
left pocket: Sony Ericsson t68i |
|
|
Eamonn
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: > 500
PM |
Sorry, this story is missing, or there is a problem with it. It may not be imported yet, you may just have the wrong ID, or the database might just be having a fit
|
usurp
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Posts: 16
PM, WWW
|
i think the datebase is overloaded or something, i think a lot of t68i fans have been checking that page and passing it along to friends to go comment. powerpage people love the t68i, if you check the recent knews you can see that had atleast 3 articles on the t68i incuding mine which was about connecting the t68i to my bluetooth ibook..
http://www.unex-t.com/bluetooth |
sunjivas
Joined: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
the 8390 is the US version of the 8310 rite?
if so then the nokia is definitely not better! |
Del
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Kent, UK
PM, WWW
|
I had one of those nokias 8310 in the uk, it was the worst phone I have ever bought, it kept going wrong left right and center, and thats after it had a firmware upgrade.
The guys talking total crap T68i is far superior.
Brought to you straight from the event horizon of a quantum singularity.   |
rudeboymcc
Joined: May 25, 2002
Posts: 287
PM |
well i've read it and it's a load of bullsh*t. this guy is claiming that the nokia is better becuase it DOENS@T have bluetooth, and DOESN@T have pictures and screensavers, and DOESNT have a joystick. he';s basiaclly saying that the nokia is better for HIS needs, becuae he doesn't want al those functions.
and as for bluetooth draining the battery, you can always turn it off when you're not using it:).
and the t68i is COLOUR. |
usurp
Joined: Feb 15, 2003
Posts: 16
PM, WWW
|
rudeboy, cool u read it too, i think powerpage just posted the article to show people nokia users are dumb lol..
andy i think his name, the powerpage guy, he is t68i freak so i know he doesnt agreee with the article and even posted his comments at the end of it.
as soon as the article is back up i will say so in here... |
bokayo
Joined: Feb 13, 2003
Posts: 198
PM |
ya right!!!! 8390 is the same as 8310 only differ in band. nokia think that they are the best... in what? okay they are the best in coming up with different models but no difference in features. i love my T68i, and NOW ...my wife also fell in love with it, so goodbye N6610( always HANGING!}, bought her a new T68i arctic blue with the latest SW, ANOTHER CONVERT!!!! HURRAY SE!
 T39m! |
jplacson
Joined: Apr 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
Heheheh... I was able to post... I was the 2 consecutive anonymous posts with the Fred Flinstone retort.  |
ppcrockar
Joined: Mar 04, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
As I see it. Nokia doesn't have any phones worth buying at all. They are either more expensive than the competition or has less features.
In the high-end they don't stand a chance. The best high-end phones are SE T68i or Siemens S55. If you want the phone with best display and don't care/don't use much of the more advanced features,then it is Panasonic GD87. If you want a smartphone P800 is by far the best choice.
Even in the low end Nokia doesn't have a chance. When it comes to low-end with colour-screen the T300 is the best or Motorola T720. When it comes to low-end Siemens has quite a few very good mobiles, and there is SE T200, T65.
When it comes to Ultra-low-end Siemens also has the best phones in this segment and SE T100 is probably quite nice (but is not available here in Sweden).
Nokia's phones are at best average. I see absolutely no reason to buy any Nokia today, they are simply behind the competion in every market segment. And with their current line of phones they do not deserve the marketshare they have. It is amazing that people still buy Nokia phones when the competition is quite hard and the competitors have better phones. |
B@RTje
Joined: Jan 27, 2002
Posts: 143
From: holland
PM |
T68 is a year old!!!!!!!! |
mkt
Joined: Dec 11, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Poland
PM |
Complete ignorant.
[addsig] |
Jowi
Joined: Feb 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Pilipinas
PM, WWW
|
he doesnt know what his saying |
Krubach
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sunny Portugal! :)
PM |
What an asshole!!!! 
Surely he has a B&W TV too, 'cause it's much better!
[ This Message was edited by: Krubach on 2003-02-20 17:56 ] |
B@RTje
Joined: Jan 27, 2002
Posts: 143
From: holland
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-02-20 18:09, B@RTje wrote:
T68 is a year old!!!!!!!!
|
|
in a positive way!
everyone still compares a one year old gsm to the newest hotshot phones.. offcource are most specs better than the t68.. DUH!
 where i;m i with my head.. but oke.. t68 is better, but that nokia wil aventualy sell better.. cause it;s nokia right..
[ This Message was edited by: B@RTje on 2003-02-20 18:12 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2003-02-20 11:18
T39m!
