| Author |
Xperia Z Officially Announced |
luwi
Joined: Jan 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Dubai
PM |
I will exchange my z to zl because it has vibrant screen!
Original
|
|
|
coolkid8689
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: 289
From: India
PM |
God... I wanna swallow ZL^^^...  |
luwi
Joined: Jan 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Dubai
PM |
It has better screen bro. I compare with my z. I will add 150usd for swap!
|
coolkid8689
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: 289
From: India
PM |
You'll add, in the sense, you'll get $150 back or you'll have to pay more...??? |
luwi
Joined: Jan 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Dubai
PM |
On 2013-03-07 16:55:06, luwi wrote:
It has better screen bro. I compare with my z. I will add 150usd for swap!
I will my z is 2nd hand already. Zl is bnew and more expensive now.
|
coolkid8689
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: 289
From: India
PM |
Oh... But you jus got your Z.. Right...???
Can't you sell it for the same price that you had bought it for...??? |
luwi
Joined: Jan 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Dubai
PM |
On 2013-03-07 17:40:05, coolkid8689 wrote:
Oh... But you jus got your Z.. Right...???
Can't you sell it for the same price that you had bought it for...???
Yea my z is 5day's old. But I fell in love with zl screen. More vibrant and zl size is great to hold.
|
mariozlp
Joined: May 29, 2007
Posts: 368
From: Greece\Athens
PM |
On 2013-03-06 22:48:13, northmonkey wrote:
On 2013-03-06 22:29:54, mariozlp wrote:
I got my xperia Z today. Love it, huge phone.
Congrats.
What do you think about:
1.Battery
2.Camera
3.Screen
ok answers.
1. Battery could have been better, but its more than ok acording to its screen and cpu. (I guess)
2.camera is fun but havent experience/done many pics.
3.screen is awesome crisp,after x10mini anything wouldlook good, but its too good. Love the details, thats why i'm ok with the phone's size. Games are awesome too (dead trigger, real racing3 +a few more) brightness is from when I bought it to 50% changed it only once to 100%, but turned it to 50 again. No need for more.
SE+LP=ME  |
tapas123
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
Posts: 289
From: India
PM |
On 2013-03-07 18:13:28, luwi wrote:
On 2013-03-07 17:40:05, coolkid8689 wrote:
Oh... But you jus got your Z.. Right...???
Can't you sell it for the same price that you had bought it for...???
Yea my z is 5day's old. But I fell in love with zl screen. More vibrant and zl size is great to hold.
so you are saying that Z and ZL have different screens???? |
coolkid8689
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: 289
From: India
PM |
GSMArena battery test for Xperia Z....
http://blog.gsmarena.com/sony[....]is-ready-here-come-the-scores/
[ This Message was edited by: coolkid8689 on 2013-03-07 18:44 ] |
northmonkey
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Posts: > 500
PM |
Doministry i trust your opinions so what do you think about all the camera sampled so far? Some people say there is less noise but less detail than pictures taken on the S? |
luwi
Joined: Jan 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Dubai
PM |
On 2013-03-07 19:40:12, tapas123 wrote:
On 2013-03-07 18:13:28, luwi wrote:
On 2013-03-07 17:40:05, coolkid8689 wrote:
Oh... But you jus got your Z.. Right...???
Can't you sell it for the same price that you had bought it for...???
Yea my z is 5day's old. But I fell in love with zl screen. More vibrant and zl size is great to hold.
so you are saying that Z and ZL have different screens????
I'm sorry to say but YES! ZL has better screen more vibrant and contrast compare to Z.
|
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
Not bad at all, its just 2hours shorter than what the GS3 got last year.
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2013-03-08 21:47 ] Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
Away
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-03-07 19:59:29, Tsepz_GP wrote:
Not bad at all, its just 2hours shorter than what the GS3 got last year.
On closer inspection, the results are amazing. The battery of my N4 is drained ridculously fast in calls. Z users that actually call will be pleasantly surprised.
Furthermore, I think it's unfair that all phones are put on at 50% brightness. I'm pretty sure 50% brightness of the Z is almost more than 100% of the S3. Because Amoled screens tend to be a lot less brighter than LCDs, they have an advantage in web-browsing in this test, which you would think to be the opposite due to the amount of white displayed.
Also, the deduction of the endurance rating is pretty stupid too. GSMarena should have a tool to set your usage (of how much call time, video playing time and web browsing time you clock) and give results accordingly.
Battery stamina mode wasn't even turned on. Don't GSMarena love their Samsung bias. Sony further optimise their battery greatly via updates anyway, so it's not a problem. It should way longer than the S3 pretty easily, when displaying at the same true brightness.
Overall, the phone has a pretty amazing battery life for a 2330mAh battery.
Don't we all just love the way certain people put in snide remarks in comments? It's always amusing when it doesn't turn out their way and completely fails on them.
[ This Message was edited by: Away on 2013-03-07 19:37 ]
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2013-03-08 21:47 ] |
tapas123
Joined: Sep 16, 2012
Posts: 289
From: India
PM |
On 2013-03-07 19:58:31, luwi wrote:
I'm sorry to say but YES! ZL has better screen more vibrant and contrast compare to Z.
How that can be i thought both Z and ZL have same screen......can anybody confirm this???
[ This Message was edited by: tapas123 on 2013-03-07 20:10 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2013-03-07 16:50
