| Author |
SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition |
milukugiuniu
Joined: Oct 16, 2012
Posts: 291
PM |
Deleted
[ This Message was edited by: milukugiuniu on 2013-05-15 10:37 ] |
|
|
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
XPERIA UL Gaga
 |
-XYZ
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
Looks quite nice. Similar to Dogo, but with what appears to be a slightly raised screen (?). |
argiriano
Joined: Jun 16, 2004
Posts: 305
From: Bulgaria
PM |
and it looks much wider than Dogo IMO... |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2013-05-15 10:31:21, nightwing369 wrote:
How good is the Cybershot G lens (the one that Sony has chosen to also use in its Honami) ?
G lens originated from Minolta G-series, it stands for "Gold" which is the pro-grade Telephoto lens for older Minolta and now A-mount DSLR/SLTs. as for quality, as far as DSLR lenses are concerned it's on par (or even better) than a Canon L-glass quality wise. G lenses are best known for their excellent "Bokeh" output. I'm not sure about the G lenses used on Cybershot Digicams though as judging by my experience with a Sony HX1, it's almost as good as their Zeiss counterpart as found on HX200v.
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-05-15 11:46 ] 10 years at Esato |
-XYZ
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-05-15 12:42:26, razec wrote:
On 2013-05-15 10:31:21, nightwing369 wrote:
How good is the Cybershot G lens (the one that Sony has chosen to also use in its Honami) ?
G lens originated from Minolta G-series, it stands for "Gold" which is the pro-grade Telephoto lens for older Minolta and now A-mount DSLR/SLTs. as for quality, as far as DSLR lenses are concerned it's on par (or even better) than a Canon L-glass quality wise. G lenses are best known for their excellent "Bokeh" output. I'm not sure about the G lenses used on Cybershot Digicams though as judging by my experience with a Sony HX1, it's almost as good as their Zeiss counterpart as found on HX200v.
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-05-15 11:46 ]
In other words, better than most smartphone lens systems. Probably on a par, or better than the Nokia Zeiss lens systems. |
Ricky D
Joined: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK (living in Beijing)
PM, WWW
|
...or it's just clever marketing.
I have a dig bick
You read that wrong |
king-james
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: M.I.A.M.I
PM |
Z&ZL and now ZR&SP... 
Why not 2 devices, one killer 5 incher and one 4,6" killer instead always doubles or triples?! 
like.no.other |
vikeviki
Joined: Oct 16, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: INDIA,bangalore
PM |
On 2013-05-15 13:36:56, king-james wrote:
Z&ZL and now ZR&SP...
Why not 2 devices, one killer 5 incher and one 4,6" killer instead always doubles or triples?!
Where does the Xperia L and UL(GAGA) stands too in this  |
king-james
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: M.I.A.M.I
PM |
Viki, only the highends are important...
Had Z and now ZL, can't say which is better...
SONY always make it so difficult...
[ This Message was edited by: king-james on 2013-05-15 13:08 ] like.no.other |
mediar
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
On 2013-05-15 08:09:25, randomuser wrote:
That Sharp phone is soooo damn ugly  
Wait, wait...
Sharp:
Sony
Apparently these two phones are absolutely identical, but, according to the Sony fanboys, the Sharp one is ugly and the Sony one is beautiful... Interesting... My only explanation for that phenomenon is the placebo effect - a psychical side effect of the fanboism.
[ This Message was edited by: mediar on 2013-05-15 13:09 ] The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
king-james
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: M.I.A.M.I
PM |
The Sharp looks clear better than gaga IMO! 
[ This Message was edited by: king-james on 2013-05-15 13:09 ] like.no.other |
Away
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
You need to get your eyes tested as has been stated before. That's the best looking Sony leak yet, and if the rule Sony look way better in official pictures and in real life than in the leaked pictures still stands, then it should look pretty beautiful.
Even comparing the photos the Sony looks so much more elegant, the Sharp looks like a fat child (width ways at least). Interesting how you've stopped saying certain series of Xperias look the same ever since you've realised every Samsung for the last 2 years has looked the same.
EDIT: ROFL!!!
For details why, see the comments below of maxtune123 and reeflotz.
I've also noted that trolls can't even get the basics right, and I should personally check that for them and just relying on them for even basics inevitably will make me look stupid too, lol.
[ This Message was edited by: Away on 2013-05-15 13:49 ] |
mediar
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
On 2013-05-15 14:19:24, Away wrote:
Interesting how you've stopped saying certain series of Xperias look the same ever since you've realised every Samsung for the last 2 years has looked the same.
Actually, since I can't make any difference between the different Xperias ( because they do really look the same ), I just gave them the collective name "Sony Xperia" with the meaning "every Xperia since Xperia S".
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
maxtune123
Joined: Apr 29, 2013
Posts: 14
PM |
lol @mediar who said that Sharp tablet is ugly?
It is in fact a beautiful tablet competitor to the ipad mini.
You just love to troll for attention, don't you?  |
|
|
Posted: 2013-05-15 11:36
