Esato

Forum > General discussions > Rumours > SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition

Previous  123 ... 932933934 ... 122712281229  Next
Author SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition
jianlin
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Oct 17, 2012
Posts: 489
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 13:10
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 13:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
^^ is it just me or the pic is broken?
10 years at Esato
napahlm
T610
Joined: Jun 18, 2003
Posts: 81
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 13:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2013-07-17 12:48:01, Ricky D wrote:
Along with medium, big and bigger goes slightly different functions to suit what Sony believe will be important to the person who would want to buy that particular size. It's not just a case of grabbing the corner, stretching and 'save as'.



True. But only ever so slight changes.
I like the designs of the Z family, reminds me of SE C901 alot. But i dont understand why so big!? Impossible to fit in my pockets at least.
Ray 3 cant come soon enough.
Tejstar
T68 gold
Joined: Feb 08, 2007
Posts: 82
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 14:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Ray 3?

What was the Ray 2?
randomuser
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 14:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2013-07-17 14:04:57, Tejstar wrote:
Ray 3?

What was the Ray 2?


Xperia U- ST25i
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 14:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
^^ here I thought it was SX
10 years at Esato
Tejstar
T68 gold
Joined: Feb 08, 2007
Posts: 82
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 14:11
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Me too - if there was any successor then the Xperia SX would be it.

ArsenalFan
K800 Black
Joined: Apr 26, 2013
Posts: 47
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 14:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Xperia V fits better to be Ray
a phone with flagship hardware and smaller screen
Arc : Ray
T : V
Honami : Ray 3

[ This Message was edited by: ArsenalFan on 2013-07-17 13:28 ]
like.no.other
MartenR
HTC One
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
Posts: 313
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 14:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
OT
Is TFT really bad? I thought it handles motion better than IPS, it has better luminance than amoled and its much cheapr but Cnet recently posted an article saying that tft is not as good as ips. I don't know what color accuracy has to do with tft.
napahlm
T610
Joined: Jun 18, 2003
Posts: 81
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 14:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Anyone remember diffrenses in price at the time of release, Arc vs Ray, T vs V? And can we expect somthing similar this time also?
nightwing369
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Mar 18, 2013
Posts: 415
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 14:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Is it me or does the supposed leaked render of the Honami look very similar to the Sony Xperia C670X mentioned many months ago?


Supposed Honami Render (Above)

Sony Xperia C670X (Above)

EDIT: out of interest, GSMarena has now put the Honami into its 'Rumour Mill' list of phones: http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_i1-5596.php
[ This Message was edited by: nightwing369 on 2013-07-17 13:58 ]
Check this for the latest on the upcoming Sony phones for 2013: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AreyfktYnDHtdHN0bVFPdUFJd0ZiNzZQcjMwV1I5M0E#gid=0
unknownC151A
Sony Xperia V
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: 459
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 15:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2013-07-17 14:55:07, nightwing369 wrote:
Is it me or does the supposed leaked render of the Honami look very similar to the Sony Xperia C670X mentioned many months ago?


Supposed Honami Render (Above)

Sony Xperia C670X (Above)

EDIT: out of interest, GSMarena has now put the Honami into its 'Rumour Mill' list of phones: http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_i1-5596.php
[ This Message was edited by: nightwing369 on 2013-07-17 13:58 ]


There's no strong evidences C670X exist and that small picture is a render phone is in EVERY Xperia JB user start up guide.
DexterMoser
Samsung Galaxy S 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2013
Posts: 443
From: Bay Harbor Islands, Miami
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 15:06
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2013-07-17 14:35:48, MartenR wrote:
OT
Is TFT really bad? I thought it handles motion better than IPS, it has better luminance than amoled and its much cheapr but Cnet recently posted an article saying that tft is not as good as ips. I don't know what color accuracy has to do with tft.


Then Cnet is dumb as shit, I don't get it why every tech related site on the internet can't even get the simplest of facts straight
Sorry to sound so harsh, but I can't hear it anymore, that TFT could be better or worse than IPS.
This just makes no sense.

TFT stands for thin-film transistor, and these are needed in many displaytechnologies like LCDs and also OLED-Displays, TFT isn't a type of a display, it is part of an LC-Display or OLED-Screen.

Liquid crystal displays (lcd) as a displaytype are also used in simple casio calculators.

Therefore you can only say that (even though it's technical wrong) TFTs can be found on better LCDs (a calculator also with an LCD uses no TFTs). And quite every Smartphone has a "TFT-Display", yes also the iPhone, the HTC One and so on. But remember that is technically wrong!

IPS is more or less just a trademark (from Hitachi) for a better display than one with twisted nematic technology (TN), IPS display from other manufactors have other names (e.g. SuperLCD, IPS+, PLS, and so on).

Conclusion:
An active-matrix LCD (TFT-LCD) is better than a normal LCD, and is at the moment very common.
An IPS-Display is superior to a TN-Display, but both ARE TFT-LCDs, and there are different names for more or less the same technology (IPS).


The wiki article gives you a good overview:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TFT_LCD
Galaxy S4 (S600)
Looking forward to the Sony Xperia Z4 (or 5)
Feynman about Beauty
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 15:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
then Cnet is dumb as shit


Is that something new? I mean prior to that, they compared Xperia S and iphone 4s camera before and claimed the iphone has better dynamic range when in fact HDR on iphone was just turned on, and S hasn't. they review cameras without proper tests, are renowned Canikon fanboys and Sony alpha bashers and are one of the worst tech review sites in the internet in existence, though I used to hang with their sites and community forums during pre-iPhone years
10 years at Esato
Rubenos
Sony Xperia Z
Joined: Jun 06, 2012
Posts: 142
PM
Posted: 2013-07-17 15:23
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2013-07-17 12:15:06, Rubenos wrote:
Nightwing, if you're wondering why nobody responds. It has been said ages ago, the render you are reffering to is a standard Xperia render. Found in the Update Center app of Sony for example. Has NOTHING to do with a phone...


OH MY GOD NIGHTWING!!

Don't be so annoying, you keep reposting your shit, and not even reading the posts!!!!!
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 932933934 ... 122712281229  Next
Goto page:
Unlock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic