Esato

Forum > Manufacturer Discussion > Motorola > Motorola RAZR i Discussion

12  Next
Author Motorola RAZR i Discussion
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-09-18 17:07
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post


Motorola XT890 RAZR i Key Features:

- 3G Network: HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100

- Connectivity: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Dual Band, DLNA, Wi - Fi HotSpot, Bluetooth v2.1 With A2DP, EDR, MicroUSB v2.0 And NFC With Android Beam

- Dimensions 122.5 x 60.9 x 8.3 mm

- Weight 126 Grams.

- Display 4.3" Super Amoled Advanced (~256 Ppi Pixel Density) With Corning Gorilla Glass

- 8 GigaBytes Memory Internal (5,25 Gigabytes Available For User)

- Card Slot (32 GigaBytes)

- 1 GigaByte Ram (970 MegaBytes After The System Boot)

- CPU Intel Atom Medfield Z2460 x86 2 GHz (SemiConductor Technology 32 nm High - K/Metal Gate)

- GPU PowerVR SGX540 (Single Core Graphics @400 MHz)

- Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) Upgradable To 4.1.2 (Jelly Bean)

- Office Document Editor (Word, Excel, PowerPoint And Reader PDF)

- 8 MP With Flash Led

- CamCorder FullHD 1080p @30 FPS (Stereo Sound Rec)

- VGA Front Chat Camera And CamCorder VGA @15 FPS (Stereo Sound Rec)

- Active Noise Cancellation With Dedicated Mic

- Standard Battery Li-Ion 2000 mAh

- Kevlar Coated And Splash Resistant Body

- Available In Black And White Colors



Technichal Specifications Photographic Razr i:

* Lens: 4 Elements Plastic
* F-Number: f/2.65
* Focal Length: 4.03mm
* Focus Range: 8 Cm - Infinity
* Iso Sensitivity: 100 - 1505
* Shutter Speed: Min - (1/2s) / Max - (1/10000s)
* Features Digital Camera: Digital Image Stabilization, Touch - Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Geo - Tagging And Dedicated Shutter Key
* Sensor: CMOS BSI OMNIVISION OV8820
* Format: 1/3.2”
* Surface: (5.68 mm x 4.54 mm)
* Flash: Led (2rd Generation)
* Pixel Size: 1.4 Microns
* Maximum Effective Pixels Resolution: 3264 x 2448 For 4:3 / 3264 x 1840 For 16:9


[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2013-01-20 05:50 ]
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2012-09-18 17:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
According to the benchmarks, the 2Ghz CPU is not really outshining the likes of a dual core Qualcomm S4 and/or quad A9 tegra3, and the SGX540 GPU is ancient to say at least, Intel should've build a lowerpower version of their HD graphics found on Sandy/ivy bridge CPUs instead. and there's the issue of android apps using native ARM codes which has to be emulated by the X86 architecture, which could lead to performance penalty.

If that thing went with dual core ~5W AMD G-series APU (with a superior low power DX11 HD7xxx gpu) instead it could blow the competition away in terms of graphics performance while consuming almost similar power as this atom chip used on this.
10 years at Esato
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2012-09-19 23:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Yes I read that too. Why is Moto sticking with qHD displays?? :-/ Haven't tried anything from Motorola since the Defy which was an ok phone
Phone?? What phone??
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-25 00:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
This Week, I'm Taking The Opportunity To Do Some Testing With Motorla Razr i And I Confess That I Am Pleasantly Surprised With This Smartphone !

The Same Is Compact, Lightweight And Has An Excellent Build !

On The Resources Side, I Am Pleasantly Surprised With The Excellent Quality Of The Music Player, Audio Quality Is Above Average And Offers a Consistent Experience !

But What Really Should Be Highlighted In This Unit Is The Excellent Camcorder And The Wonderful Web Browsing, Fluency And Speed In Various Sites Is Worthy To Match The More Advanced Models Such As (GALAXY S III), What Is Truly Something Amazing !

On The More Negative Aspects Are Due To The Mediocre Autonomy Of Battery And Archaic/Weak GPU !
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-25 19:37 ]
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-25 01:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Below Some Synthetic Benchmarks !

QUADRANT



ANTUTU



GEEKBENCH 2



VELLAMO



BENCHMARK PI



LINPACK (RUN MULTI – THREAD MODE)



NENAMARK 2



GPU BENCH



GPU MARK



BROWSERMARK 2.0



SUNSPIDER 0.91



RIABENCH FOCUS TESTS



MOZILLA KRAKEN BENCHMARK



GOOGLE OCTANE



HTML 5



GLBENCHMARK 2.5 EGYPT HD (ONCREEN)



GLBENCHMARK 2.5 EGYPT HD (1080p OFFSCREEN)



BASEMARK ES 2.0



MULTITOUCH TESTER


[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2013-01-14 02:43 ]
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-25 23:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Today I Took The Day To Visit My Grandparents, That For More Than Two Months Did Not See !

As My 808 PureView PRO Was Out Of Battery, I Decided To Make My Walk With The Galaxy S III And My New Razr i, Savvy So I Decided To Make a Comparison Between These Two Smartphones, Testing The Performance Of Both In One Night Shot With Bad Lighting Condition !

The 2 Devices Were Supported To Stop The Balcony And Configured To Trigger On Night Mode, Note Just Below The Result Of Both !!!

GALAXY S III (Exposure Time 1/2s And Iso 640)



RAZR i (Exposure Time 1/2s And Iso 800)


[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-26 03:02 ]
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-25 23:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Particularly I Prefer Result Provided By S III !!!

For Despite The Darker Image, Same Account With Less Noise !

However the New Smartphone From Motorola Has A Result Expressive, Featuring Increased Brightness !
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-26 02:51 ]
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-26 04:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Some Interesting Reviews Of Razr i !

ZTOP: http://ztop.com.br/motorola-razr-i-xt890-review/

GSMARENA: http://www.gsmarena.com/motorola_razr_i_xt890-review-828.php

MOBILEWITCH: http://www.mobilewitch.com/Mo[....]Android_review_details_122.htm

PHONEARENA: http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Motorola-RAZR-i-Review_id3151

TUDOCELULAR: http://www.tudocelular.com/Mo[....]ovas/n1626/Motorola-RAZRi.html
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-28 02:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Sample Images Camera: Example Mode Landscape !!!


[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-28 01:26 ]
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-28 02:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Sample Images Camera: Example Mode Macro !!!

Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-28 05:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Sample Video Camera !!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSmXAY-b3sE

Numbers From The Video Recording Razr i:

File Format: MP4
Video Codec: AVC, 18.2 Mbit / s
Resolution: 1920 x 1080, 30 f / s

Audio Codec: AAC, 128 kbit/s
Channels: 2 Channels, 44.1 kHz

P.S: Good Work Of Motorola !!!
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-29 05:20 ]
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-11-29 06:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Another Sample Video Camera !!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9-MYaR_1fw

Numbers From The Video Recording Razr i:

File Format: MP4
Video Codec: AVC, 18.2 Mbit / s
Resolution: 1920 x 1080, 30 f / s

Audio Codec: AAC, 128 kbit/s
Channels: 2 Channels, 44.1 kHz

P.S: Good Work Of Motorola !!!
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-11-29 05:21 ]
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2012-12-03 02:23
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
After Continually Test The 2 Smartphones Top Of Line Motorola !

I Came Some Of The Conclusions:

Razr i Over Razr HD

* Better Digital Camcorder

* Better Web Navigation

* In Practice... Better Battery Life

* More Compact

Razr HD Over Razr i

* Better Digital Camera

* Better Audio Quality (Music Player)

* Better Display

* Best Performance In Games, Especially In 3D (Better GPU)

P.S: In Other Resources Both Smartphones Are Very Similar, Or Be, Very Good !!!
[ This Message was edited by: Guarulhos on 2012-12-04 00:38 ]
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2013-01-04 05:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Update Of Android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean For The RAZR I Arrived !!!

http://www.droidevelopers.com/rsd/showthread.php?t=138
Guarulhos
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Posts: > 500
From: Guarulhos - Brazil
PM
Posted: 2013-01-04 05:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
My New HomeScreen After Update To Android 4.1.2 !!!

Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi