| Author |
Sony Xperia Rumours 2012 |
smclion102
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
so the Future Sony Mobile OS
1- Android
2- Windows Phone
3- Sony OS ?
---
Like how Samsung is today- Android,Windows phone and Bada ?
| |
|
pmugghc
Joined: Jan 08, 2011
Posts: 208
PM |
On 2012-02-13 22:22:33, smclion102 wrote:
so the Future Sony Mobile OS
1- Android
2- Windows Phone
3- Sony OS ?
---
Like how Samsung is today- Android,Windows phone and Bada ?
Samsung is quite a lot bigger than Sony on the phone side, so they have much more resources. They also have the Tizen which they may or may not merge with Bada. I think that's more to hedge their bets. The Galaxy (i.e. Android) line is what has made Samsung grow so much recently. They haven't put much effort into WP.
I think Sony should try to bring some of their own unique HW technologies to their phone lines, they don't have much of SW skills and market clout to start making their own eco-system (read: apps). If Microsoft+Nokia is struggling to make WP viable, what chances would Sony have with their own system, while they at the same time are bleeding financially ? Microsoft has deep pockets, Sony doesn't. |
marcink
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: 121
PM |
Does Sony really have any unique (and important) HW technologies that could be transferred to phones? Don't see anything. I believe the should execute better and start putting better components. |
pauvincent
Joined: Oct 17, 2010
Posts: 202
From: Pasig city, Phillippines
PM |
On 2012-02-14 12:13:28, marcink wrote:
Does Sony really have any unique (and important) HW technologies that could be transferred to phones? Don't see anything. I believe the should execute better and start putting better components.
Well, they have that bravia thingy for starters  |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
Sony Ericsson marketing boss Hilton exits amid relaunch
http://www.marketingmagazine.[....]ss-Hilton-exits-amid-relaunch/ |
motvikt
Joined: Jun 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-02-14 13:00:19, pauvincent wrote:
On 2012-02-14 12:13:28, marcink wrote:
Does Sony really have any unique (and important) HW technologies that could be transferred to phones? Don't see anything. I believe the should execute better and start putting better components.
Well, they have that bravia thingy for starters
They wanted the best screen for their vita and choose Samsung super amoled plus :/
Bravia is a gimmick |
smclion102
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-02-14 16:40:08, motvikt wrote:
On 2012-02-14 13:00:19, pauvincent wrote:
On 2012-02-14 12:13:28, marcink wrote:
Does Sony really have any unique (and important) HW technologies that could be transferred to phones? Don't see anything. I believe the should execute better and start putting better components.
Well, they have that bravia thingy for starters
They wanted the best screen for their vita and choose Samsung super amoled plus :/
Bravia is a gimmick
Bro Vita has OLED not Amoled Plus  |
smclion102
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
HTC phones getting PlayStation Suite certification in 2012?
Good News for SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATION ?? or SONY ?? |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
When the Vita was in development Samsung and Sony still had the joint venture S-LCD. We will see what display will be used in the upcoming Sony phones in Q3 and next year. |
djin
Joined: Jun 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
@motvikt,
Psvita has OLED, AMOLED is not OLED.
@marcink,
Sony makes screens, camera, walkman, speakers and I think all of that can be used to make their cellphones.
Moreover, Sony is considering the ps vita os for smartphones.
Xperia T + N 96 R.I.P Desire  |
motvikt
Joined: Jun 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
PM |
http://www.oled-info.com/amol[....]ed-sonys-psp-vita-made-samsung
http://www.theverge.com/2011/[....]n-vita-japan-review/in/2559256
The most prominent part of the Vita hardware is the 5-inch, 960 x 544 Super AMOLED Plus display from Samsung, which takes up most of the front of the unit. It's absolutely gorgeous, with fantastic color reproduction and deep black levels that often make it hard to tell where the bezel stops and the screen begins. Viewing angles are very good, with the picture remaining clear at extreme positions, though like many other OLED displays it can take on a blueish tint when the system is tilted — you can see what’s happening on screen from nearly 180 degrees, but the color temperature is inaccurate unless you’re looking at it relatively straight on. The screen is glossy, but I found it generally easier to view outside than any PSP model ever was — it still didn’t get great results in direct sunlight, though. With a pixel density of about 220ppi, we're not talking Retina Display (326ppi) or Galaxy Nexus (316ppi) levels of sharpness here, but at the distance you're likely to be holding the device, pixels are rarely distinguishable. Even when you can see the pixels, the RGB stripe arrangement makes everything clear and accurate — no PenTile graininess here. However, certain software titles we've been testing have exhibited resolution issues that undo a lot of the good work the display can do — more on that later.
Want more proof?
edit. Like I said, Bravia is a gimmick, Sony displays are dying and it would surprise me if Sony leaves the TV-business altogether, the new CEO hinted that no branch was safe (TV is losing most money atm)
[ This Message was edited by: motvikt on 2012-02-14 17:27 ] |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-02-14 18:23:53, motvikt wrote:
http://www.oled-info.com/amol[....]ed-sonys-psp-vita-made-samsung
http://www.theverge.com/2011/[....]n-vita-japan-review/in/2559256
The most prominent part of the Vita hardware is the 5-inch, 960 x 544 Super AMOLED Plus display from Samsung, which takes up most of the front of the unit. It's absolutely gorgeous, with fantastic color reproduction and deep black levels that often make it hard to tell where the bezel stops and the screen begins. Viewing angles are very good, with the picture remaining clear at extreme positions, though like many other OLED displays it can take on a blueish tint when the system is tilted — you can see what’s happening on screen from nearly 180 degrees, but the color temperature is inaccurate unless you’re looking at it relatively straight on. The screen is glossy, but I found it generally easier to view outside than any PSP model ever was — it still didn’t get great results in direct sunlight, though. With a pixel density of about 220ppi, we're not talking Retina Display (326ppi) or Galaxy Nexus (316ppi) levels of sharpness here, but at the distance you're likely to be holding the device, pixels are rarely distinguishable. Even when you can see the pixels, the RGB stripe arrangement makes everything clear and accurate — no PenTile graininess here. However, certain software titles we've been testing have exhibited resolution issues that undo a lot of the good work the display can do — more on that later.
Want more proof?
edit. Like I said, Bravia is a gimmick, Sony displays are dying and it would surprise me if Sony leaves the TV-business altogether, the new CEO hinted that no branch was safe (TV is losing most money atm)
[ This Message was edited by: motvikt on 2012-02-14 17:27 ]
Amoled screens are not even used in TV`s. And you can google some TV reviews and 95% of them will used the Sony Bravia line as the standard. They have the best picture quality and cost the most.
two links as examples
http://tv.toptenreviews.com/led-tv/
http://reviews.cnet.com/best-led-tvs/ |
motvikt
Joined: Jun 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-02-14 18:51:13, DACHA wrote:
On 2012-02-14 18:23:53, motvikt wrote:
http://www.oled-info.com/amol[....]ed-sonys-psp-vita-made-samsung
http://www.theverge.com/2011/[....]n-vita-japan-review/in/2559256
The most prominent part of the Vita hardware is the 5-inch, 960 x 544 Super AMOLED Plus display from Samsung, which takes up most of the front of the unit. It's absolutely gorgeous, with fantastic color reproduction and deep black levels that often make it hard to tell where the bezel stops and the screen begins. Viewing angles are very good, with the picture remaining clear at extreme positions, though like many other OLED displays it can take on a blueish tint when the system is tilted — you can see what’s happening on screen from nearly 180 degrees, but the color temperature is inaccurate unless you’re looking at it relatively straight on. The screen is glossy, but I found it generally easier to view outside than any PSP model ever was — it still didn’t get great results in direct sunlight, though. With a pixel density of about 220ppi, we're not talking Retina Display (326ppi) or Galaxy Nexus (316ppi) levels of sharpness here, but at the distance you're likely to be holding the device, pixels are rarely distinguishable. Even when you can see the pixels, the RGB stripe arrangement makes everything clear and accurate — no PenTile graininess here. However, certain software titles we've been testing have exhibited resolution issues that undo a lot of the good work the display can do — more on that later.
Want more proof?
edit. Like I said, Bravia is a gimmick, Sony displays are dying and it would surprise me if Sony leaves the TV-business altogether, the new CEO hinted that no branch was safe (TV is losing most money atm)
Amoled screens are not even used in TV`s. And you can google some TV reviews and 95% of them will used the Sony Bravia line as the standard. They have the best picture quality and cost the most.
two links as examples
http://tv.toptenreviews.com/led-tv/
http://reviews.cnet.com/best-led-tvs/
Yes, Sony tvs are awesome, have one myself  But that doesnt change the fact that Sonys tv branch is bleeding money. The 2012 lineup is very bad though, my next tv will be a samsung sadly (love those thin bezels and media player)
Sorry for OT.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/[....]i-hard-decisions-restructuring
[ This Message was edited by: motvikt on 2012-02-14 18:13 ] |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-02-14 19:05:56, motvikt wrote:
On 2012-02-14 18:51:13, DACHA wrote:
On 2012-02-14 18:23:53, motvikt wrote:
http://www.oled-info.com/amol[....]ed-sonys-psp-vita-made-samsung
http://www.theverge.com/2011/[....]n-vita-japan-review/in/2559256
The most prominent part of the Vita hardware is the 5-inch, 960 x 544 Super AMOLED Plus display from Samsung, which takes up most of the front of the unit. It's absolutely gorgeous, with fantastic color reproduction and deep black levels that often make it hard to tell where the bezel stops and the screen begins. Viewing angles are very good, with the picture remaining clear at extreme positions, though like many other OLED displays it can take on a blueish tint when the system is tilted — you can see what’s happening on screen from nearly 180 degrees, but the color temperature is inaccurate unless you’re looking at it relatively straight on. The screen is glossy, but I found it generally easier to view outside than any PSP model ever was — it still didn’t get great results in direct sunlight, though. With a pixel density of about 220ppi, we're not talking Retina Display (326ppi) or Galaxy Nexus (316ppi) levels of sharpness here, but at the distance you're likely to be holding the device, pixels are rarely distinguishable. Even when you can see the pixels, the RGB stripe arrangement makes everything clear and accurate — no PenTile graininess here. However, certain software titles we've been testing have exhibited resolution issues that undo a lot of the good work the display can do — more on that later.
Want more proof?
edit. Like I said, Bravia is a gimmick, Sony displays are dying and it would surprise me if Sony leaves the TV-business altogether, the new CEO hinted that no branch was safe (TV is losing most money atm)
Amoled screens are not even used in TV`s. And you can google some TV reviews and 95% of them will used the Sony Bravia line as the standard. They have the best picture quality and cost the most.
two links as examples
http://tv.toptenreviews.com/led-tv/
http://reviews.cnet.com/best-led-tvs/
Yes, Sony tvs are awesome, have one myself But that doesnt change the fact that Sonys tv branch is bleeding money. The 2012 lineup is very bad though, my next tv will be a samsung sadly (love those thin bezels and media player)
Sorry for OT.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/[....]i-hard-decisions-restructuring
[ This Message was edited by: motvikt on 2012-02-14 18:13 ]
Sony sold its shear of S-LCD back to Samsung because they had a good reason. Now Samsung is admitting that it is loosing money on the LCD division.
Samsung LCD flat panel division making a loss, may be spun off in favor of OLED
http://www.theverge.com/2012/[....]t-panel-division-restructuring
[ This Message was edited by: DACHA on 2012-02-14 19:49 ] |
worf1000
Joined: Nov 01, 2011
Posts: 265
PM |
On 2012-02-14 19:05:56, motvikt wrote:
On 2012-02-14 18:51:13, DACHA wrote:
On 2012-02-14 18:23:53, motvikt wrote:
http://www.oled-info.com/amol[....]ed-sonys-psp-vita-made-samsung
http://www.theverge.com/2011/[....]n-vita-japan-review/in/2559256
The most prominent part of the Vita hardware is the 5-inch, 960 x 544 Super AMOLED Plus display from Samsung, which takes up most of the front of the unit. It's absolutely gorgeous, with fantastic color reproduction and deep black levels that often make it hard to tell where the bezel stops and the screen begins. Viewing angles are very good, with the picture remaining clear at extreme positions, though like many other OLED displays it can take on a blueish tint when the system is tilted — you can see what’s happening on screen from nearly 180 degrees, but the color temperature is inaccurate unless you’re looking at it relatively straight on. The screen is glossy, but I found it generally easier to view outside than any PSP model ever was — it still didn’t get great results in direct sunlight, though. With a pixel density of about 220ppi, we're not talking Retina Display (326ppi) or Galaxy Nexus (316ppi) levels of sharpness here, but at the distance you're likely to be holding the device, pixels are rarely distinguishable. Even when you can see the pixels, the RGB stripe arrangement makes everything clear and accurate — no PenTile graininess here. However, certain software titles we've been testing have exhibited resolution issues that undo a lot of the good work the display can do — more on that later.
Want more proof?
edit. Like I said, Bravia is a gimmick, Sony displays are dying and it would surprise me if Sony leaves the TV-business altogether, the new CEO hinted that no branch was safe (TV is losing most money atm)
Amoled screens are not even used in TV`s. And you can google some TV reviews and 95% of them will used the Sony Bravia line as the standard. They have the best picture quality and cost the most.
two links as examples
http://tv.toptenreviews.com/led-tv/
http://reviews.cnet.com/best-led-tvs/
Yes, Sony tvs are awesome, have one myself But that doesnt change the fact that Sonys tv branch is bleeding money. The 2012 lineup is very bad though, my next tv will be a samsung sadly (love those thin bezels and media player)
Sorry for OT.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/[....]i-hard-decisions-restructuring
[ This Message was edited by: motvikt on 2012-02-14 18:13 ]
You allready have a Samsung TV, do not pretent you want a buy Sony TV becouse of bad line up? Are you kidding me.
And Vita use OLED screen not Amoled screen, further more its Sony tech and not Samsung tech, they use only those becouse the have a agree wit Sony becouse Sony is not goverment supported finacial for mass production what Samsung and LG have.
Don't pretent Sony has nothing or somthing like that.
Sorry for OT. | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2012-02-13 22:22
