| Author |
another camera test with Vivaz (newer) |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
cons ans pros - lowlight, flash and optimal weather..............
Nokia C7
---------------
Optimal weather
flash
no flash
Iphone 4
---------------------
Nokia N8...................very nice photo 
-----------------
Vivaz........check that photo  Vivaz really win "the" optimal weather challenge.
------------------
Samsung Galaxy
-----------------
Winner, (used google translate)
There was a steady final battle between Nokia N8, Iphone 4 and Sony Ericsson Vivaz where Nokia N8 finally took home the victory points. N8 has a higher megapixel count than all other phones in the test and is the only one who is equipped with a real flash. The number of megapixels really says nothing about camera quality, however, Iphone 4 was much lower, but still very good pictures.
Perhaps most significantly, the optics of the camera and the images of N8 gets sharper and clearer. Available settings are also unmatched (although they are almost identical also for the C7). What surprised me a bit was to point-light in the Iphone 4 was so powerful that Vivaz: one actually beats the other phones in the test on your fingers in macro photography. Lowest, Sony Ericsson's X10, which, however, had placed themselves better on the video recording was not so miserably poor. Hopefully this can be fixed in future software updates.
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2011-01-07 20:42 ] | |
|
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
of course N8 would win,because Satio wasnt there..and when cat's not home... 
[ This Message was edited by: masada1971 on 2011-01-07 23:41 ] |
hibiskus
Joined: Oct 12, 2010
Posts: 65
From: Serbia
PM |
hey thanks for effort, you did great job! But let me somment few things. First, picture processing in phones. N8 is first Nokia phone that shows colours as they are, Vivaz and iphone may look better, but thats because they are unrealistic,especially iphone. Second, I like sharp images, check out what Motorola ZN5 does with details in photo section, it eats every non 12MP cam phone for breakfast, Vivaz, X10, N82, etc etc are not even close. Third if you really want to compare images, upload them full size so we can see details.
And try not to use auto settings, for instance Galaxy S has chosen normal mode for shooting, and thats why theres so much noise on both pictures. If you had used night landscape or somethingm it would be much better.
Cheers! |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
well, outdoor i prefer Vivaz more then super-goofy-symbian 3 N8.......
ps....the good thing is that N8 isn't that expensive (iphone 4 is about 2-300 euro more expensive)
pss.......which image sensor does N8 use ???? someone know ?????
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2011-01-08 09:05 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
hhmm.......im not buying that Nokia N8 is the best.......ive been looking at some shots between N8 and Pixon, and Pixon have clearly better colour rendition and clearness.
N8
------
Pixon 12
-------------
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2011-01-08 12:12 ] |
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
The N8 tends to have dull pics lacking in saturation, I agree the pixon looks better too. But I dont know who would win between pixon and the N8, looking through the esato photo section would probably tell.
N8 also lacks contrast.
[ This Message was edited by: mriley on 2011-01-08 16:15 ] Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!  ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
fairen
Joined: Aug 13, 2009
Posts: 164
PM |
Looks like N8 has nailed it! very nice photos | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2011-01-07 21:32
