| Author |
hugh camera test with Satio on top |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
Satio won in the end because it have better/easier camera-features & functions. though, i think Pixon and N86 photo quality is very good............that candy photo by Satio is splendid 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia x10
Satio
Nokia N86
Samsung pixon 12
HTC desire
LG crystal
Nokia N900
Iphone 3GS
scores and verdicts
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2011-01-06 20:51 ] | |
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
The top camera phones one year ago... I don't see a link to the test. Was it done recently?
|
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
Pixon 12 is clearly the best, washed out results from the Satio, too much NR.
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!  ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
Sky Hi
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
Posts: 106
PM |
You forgot the BEST one: C905!
10 years non-stop SE user:
T300->K500->K700->K800->K810->C905->Xperia Mini |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
Pixon have probably the "best" image quality, i agree on that,....but (like i said) Satio won because it have better/easier features/function.
though, i would not buy a Pixon......Samsung´s interface and UI is just crappy and un-realstic.
ps...that second Pixon picture is really bad (over-bright, and so on).........so even Pixon has it backsides......
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2011-01-07 12:42 ] |
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
I wouldn't buy a Pixon either, neither would I buy a Satio, if you want good photos and video dont buy a phone just because it's got a good camera on it, buy a high end compact or a DSLR depending on how you take photos.
@skyline
SE did a very good job at marketing the C905's camera, they constantly compared it to the image quality of compacts and they even went as far as to lie about the megapixel count and write 8.1 MP on the face of the camera, when in reality the pixel count was 7.9. It was all marketing, much like Apple does with every single product they release , even if it doesn't deserve all the hyp. The same goes for the C905, marketing it so well paid off for SE, the discussion thread is 350+ pages long, everyone wanted a phone with a high quality camera on.
The truth of the C905 camera is that it's not that good... Noise reduction ruins any detail, I posted a comparison between C901 and C905, 5 MP vs 8 MP and the C901 won hands down in terms of detail even though it had a lower resolution... marketing can be very powerfu.
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010! ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2011-01-06 21:35
