Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Symbian phones > Satio - 12mp vs 5 mp - This is how they sell phones!

12  Next
Author Satio - 12mp vs 5 mp - This is how they sell phones!
zide
Satio Silver
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM
Posted: 2010-10-22 03:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

*** EDIT: Comparison between Satio and E72@12MP in the end of this page. ***


Today I got curious about the quality of Satio's 5mp photos, then I took some shots and compared it to the 12 mp ones.

Look what I got when I rezided the 5mp ones to 12mp (click on the miniature to see the full photo and then, in imagehack, right-click -> "view photo", to view in 100%):

1- 12MP


1- 5MP (Resized to 12MP)


2- 12MP


2- 5MP (Resized to 12MP)


3- 12MP


3- 5MP (Resized to 12MP)


4- 12MP


4- 5MP (Resized to 12MP)


5- 12MP


5- 5MP (Resized to 12MP)



Ridiculous. 12mp photos are just expanded 5mp ones, there is no additional captured detail. The only difference is the amount of compression added.

This is a great way too sell super mega high megapixel flagship phones! What a shame.
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2010-10-23 18:40 ]
See my photos taken with the C902, Satio or E72 in here!
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2010-10-22 10:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
So you finally discovered the megapixel myth?

The Satio does have a 12MP sensor but you don't get 12MP resolution from its photos due to:

- Noise reduction removing fine details

- JPEG compression also removing fine details

And most importantly:

- Poor quality lens that cannot resolve fine details onto such a small sensor. The image sensor in the Satio is not much larger than 2 matchstick heads side-by-side. And on this you project an image with 12 million pixels. To get full resolution you'd need very expensive optics. Are you ready to pay for this? Most people aren't and camphone makers like realise this and compromise on the quality to keep the cost at acceptable levels.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2010-10-22 09:42 ]
dipb
Satio Black
Joined: Oct 18, 2007
Posts: 209
From: West Yorkshire, UK
PM
Posted: 2010-10-22 11:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Also, if you have to compare, 5mp to 12 mp then you have to resize 12mp picture to 5mp size and then see the details retained not resize 5mp to 12 mp.
zide
Satio Silver
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM
Posted: 2010-10-22 14:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Resizing from 12mp to 5mp will be the same as we're talking about the same picture expanded in two different resolutions, I also tested it.

About the megapixel myth, I know about it and I understand it, however, it is not supposed to be like this, literally. Usually, upgrading for a higher megapixel camera does not worth it unless we also get better optics and sensor, in this case, we are completely cheated by see as there are effectively no improvements in the image.

I'll make make a few comparison shots soon, with the 12mp Satio against the 12mp Nokia E72. And I bet that N72 will perform better at 12mp.
See my photos taken with the C902, Satio or E72 in here!
zide
Satio Silver
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM
Posted: 2010-10-22 20:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Now some examples comparing Satio's 12MP to 5MP, this time I downsized the 12MP ones to 5MP.

12MP rezided to 5MP:


5MP:


12MP rezided to 5MP:


5MP:


12MP rezided to 5MP:


5MP:


As you can see, there is absolutely no detail lost and images are equalty good. So, I think there is no point in using Satio's 12MP setting as it will only get your media browsing and in camera operations slower. Satio is nothing more than a fine 5MP camera. Oh, and I'm curious about Pixon12 and N8.
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2010-10-23 18:35 ]
See my photos taken with the C902, Satio or E72 in here!
TTT
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Feb 23, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM
Posted: 2010-10-22 22:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The Pixon 12 hasn't got a big sensor so it won't be a big difference.
The N8 however would be cool to see.
I taking pictures
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2010-10-23 13:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
GSMArena posts resolution charts in their camera phone reviews. Here are full size crops from Nokia N8, Samsung PIXON12 and SE Satio, side by side:



And for comparison with two 5MP phones, scaled up to 12MP, here is Nokia E72 and SE C901:



Uploaded with ImageShack.us
dipb
Satio Black
Joined: Oct 18, 2007
Posts: 209
From: West Yorkshire, UK
PM
Posted: 2010-10-23 14:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@zide thanks for the new set of snaps 12mp rezide to 5mp.. if you compare them side by side, you will realise that 12mp rezided contains more details compared to 5mp. look at the last indoor picture containing the brush, you will the big difference. Same is noted in the outdoor ones which are bit at a distance. Also, the road has got more details specially near the cobbled road on left hand bottom corner in your first set.

AbuBasim's post makes it clear further.
Dimas.94
Model not set
Joined: Aug 09, 2010
Posts: 37
PM
Posted: 2010-10-23 17:18
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Now that's something!
zide
Satio Silver
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM
Posted: 2010-10-23 18:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The difference is so vestigial that I really think that's caused by the stronger JPEG compression (note that even after resized 12MP photos are almost 60% bigger).

Anyway, I tried to open a thread with some Satio vs E72@12MP but moderators started bugger me.

Here it is:

Yeah, everybody knows that MPs don't don't matter that much but in the end we all get our low MP phone replaced with a higher one. Now some samples comparing Satio to E72 with 12MP (expanded using Windows 7's paint) and one comparing Satio at 5MP with E72 also with 5MP:

All with auto-mode (except the Daylight WB):

E72 12MP:


Satio:


E72 12MP:


Satio:


E72 12MP:


Satio:


E72 12MP:


Satio:


E72 12MP:


Satio:


Here is Satio at 5MP:


E72 5MP:


Conclusion:

E72's shows more detail but also more noise and it seems to me that Satio is a fake 12 MP phone as it's capabilities are on par with E72's 5MP sensor. This way all good 5MP phones, such as C901, 6700, Elm, etc, could be advertised as 12MP phones because their are as good in 12MP as Satio.
Any way, I'm selling my E72 and I'll keep my Satio manly because of the month album gallery, camera cover, xenon and more accurate auto-focus and ISO selection in lowlight scenes.
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2010-10-23 20:02 ]
See my photos taken with the C902, Satio or E72 in here!
norbi_nw
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM
Posted: 2010-10-23 20:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
all SE phones take red pictures by default. Xenon and no xexnon they are all red-ish. Aka. THEY SUCK HORSEBALLS!
no detail at all. all fine detail are washed out. When nokia used this much noise reduction you all where "nokia sucks" and now SE uses it, and all look like painting, now some of you still have a nice tongue and know how to use it to worship SE.
I have had it with SE since my G900 and then the final drop was the Satio.
http://norbinw.blogspot.com
gharknes1
Satio Black
Joined: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 231
PM
Posted: 2010-10-24 12:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
well you guys are missing the point here, downsizing a 12mp photo to 5mp is exactly what you are doing, it is a smaller picture with less pixels, now try zooming a 5mp picture 10x then do the same with a 12mp picture without altering the pixel density then you will see the difference, picture size does not equate to pixel count it indicates zoom level or density, as an example, take a look at a newspaper picture really close - it will be made up of tiny dots, now zoom a section of it with a magnifying glass, the picture increasesin size but the pixcel density stays the same.
mriley
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2010-10-24 14:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Looking at the first post, there is a difference between the 5MP photos and the 12 MP ones, but the only difference is resolution. Both 5MP and 12MP have the same terrible quality, at ISO 500 the noise covers everything.
Having 12MP doesn't mean better picture quality, it just means more resolution, which you can only really use when its sunny otherwise all your cropping is noise. Since when did people need so much resolution on camera-phones anyway?

The 12MP downsized to 5MP look slightly better than the 5MP ones, but only very slight better resolution.
Using 5MP instead of 12MP wont increase quality, it will only save space and if I had a satio I would keep maximum resolution and stick to taking photos in good light.
As AbuBasim says, the photo quality is not just about the sensor, it's also about good optics, something that is unrealistic to put in a phone, and satio's potential detail with the 12 MP resolution is totally ruined by its processing.

Nokia E72 crushed the satio in the comparison, E72 has much more detail, satio pics have a huge amount of noise reduction added in processing. The Satio photos are more saturated than the E72, I prefer E72 - much more detail, more realistic colours.
Why are the E72 photos re-sized to 12MP? I think it would be better to see each camera at its original resolution and compare details that way - should be Satio @ 12MP vs Nokia E72 @ 5MP.

In regards to satio - what's the point in having such a high resolution when excessive noise reduction and compression ruins any potential detail?
I aggree with your conclusion, I'm not sure about 'fake' resolution, the amount of detail produced has a lot to do with the processing the camera does to produce the JPEG, such as sharpening, noise reduction, and saturation.
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!
-------------------
Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can
zide
Satio Silver
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM
Posted: 2010-10-24 15:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@ gharknes1: In the first row of examples you have upsized photos. There you can see that even expanded 5MP photos keep the same detail as original 12MP ones (might be a very small difference however I believe it's caused by the stronger JPEG compression).

@ mriley: I have upsized E72 photos so we can compare both phones at the same resolution and therefore show that Satio is not a 12MP phone. It is a 5MP phone, with a 12MP mode that expands it's 5MP captures to 12MP!
If I add some noise reduction to E72 12MP photos I get with a photo just like Satio's, still slightly better.
See my photos taken with the C902, Satio or E72 in here!
mriley
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2010-10-24 22:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

@ mriley: I have upsized E72 photos so we can compare both phones at the same resolution and therefore show that Satio is not a 12MP phone. It is a 5MP phone, with a 12MP mode that expands it's 5MP captures to 12MP!


That's not true though, you're only evidence for that is that when 5MP E72 photos are scaled up to 12MP they look comparable (better) than the Satio's shots.
There's a difference between picture size and the amount of megapixels on a sensor, there are 12 million pixels on the satio's sensor, not 5 million, so it does produce 12 MP photos. The only thing is that makes the pictures turn out so bad is the processing and compression after the photo has been captured.
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!
-------------------
Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi