Author |
voting 1 on photos |
ceaser2008 Joined: Jul 14, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Surat, India PM |
Congrats for the promotion.
|
|
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
My now famous pic in the church has 52 votes
Phone?? What phone?? |
ceaser2008 Joined: Jul 14, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Surat, India PM |
Thats awesome. Keep going mate.
|
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
Now @ 53 votes
Phone?? What phone?? |
jms2367 Joined: Jun 13, 2003 Posts: 302 From: The Philippines PM |
Hi Tranced. Another disgruntled user of the photo section here. Any news if the photo section's voting system will e modified? |
jms2367 Joined: Jun 13, 2003 Posts: 302 From: The Philippines PM |
I have been looking at my photo for the past couple of weeks and it has been consistently in the top 10 with 24 votes. During the past few days, It has received about 4 votes of one (1) rating. I wonder if these are just newly created accounts.
Now it has been bumped to number 65.
[ This Message was edited by: jms2367 on 2010-12-27 09:06 ] |
io_bg Joined: Jan 09, 2008 Posts: 326 From: Bourgas, Bulgaria PM |
On 2010-10-19 23:56:31, tranced wrote:
Sooner or later you'll have the answer to this. This is something that's been bothering me too. Not because my photos are not in the first top 10 page, it just that some unfairness has been done here.
So a is a solution for the 1-mark voters problem is coming? I hope it is! |
hihihans Joined: Mar 15, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Netherlands PM |
The only problem here are the 1mark voters.
|
mriley Joined: Oct 03, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: UK PM |
On 2010-10-19 23:56:31, tranced wrote:
Sooner or later you'll have the answer to this. This is something that's been bothering me too. Not because my photos are not in the first top 10 page, it just that some unfairness has been done here.
We, the mods, have caught some of the members here cheating in the photo gallery before. But there will be something very useful to stop this soon.
What happened about this?
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010! ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
Did you know that photo of mine i took on the Elm in the church before it dropped out the top 100 had 70 votes
Phone?? What phone?? |
laffen Joined: Aug 07, 2001 Posts: > 500 From: Oslo, Norway PM |
The voting system keeps track of every vote. I know some members sign up with fake accounts just to influence the photo voting. I haven't had the time to create a script to find out who these members are.
I have the data, but not the tool for removing votes and banning members quick and easy. It will come, but I can't say when |
hihihans Joined: Mar 15, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Netherlands PM |
Thanks Laffen.
I just can't imagine why it is that some people want to vote pics down. Is it such a big deal to be in top 10
|
CecoBizona Joined: May 25, 2010 Posts: 11 PM |
The problem with the 1-mark voters is very serious lately, for an example I upload a couple of pictures in a couple of hours today and now each one of them have 10 votes with 1!!! I also have a photo with 18 votes with 1, not altered in any way.
I wonder about the people doing this, how many time they spent in downgrading others photos just to ensure their own stay in the top. Very stupid and pointless, but as I can see is important for some people here. |
Marly Joined: Jun 04, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Netherlands PM |
On 2011-04-07 09:41:56, hihihans wrote:
Thanks Laffen.
I just can't imagine why it is that some people want to vote pics down. Is it such a big deal to be in top 10
Can't imagine either, it's pathetic, these people need to get a life
"America: please don’t be a Dumpfkopf" |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
Just to add. I recently took some photos on a Samsung Galaxy S of Lichfield Cathedral. Now I have deleted many of my photos recently and left a handful of my best. But I believe the Samsung photos to be of decent quality and I took time to make them good. But in the space of a few hours two of my shots received 27 votes each and virtually all were 1 star. Suspicious?? Indeed. I have my ideas who it is. Just cos sometimes a photo is NOT taken by a Sony Ericsson it gets voted down. Childish.
Phone?? What phone?? |
|