| Author |
Post your pics and videos taken on the iPhone 4 |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
I don't think you need to worry about that. I do agree with you - partly. Not that the Elm is better. But your previous Nokia 6700 was better than the iPhone 4. Very nice shots. Low noise AND very mild NR. Why didn't you keep it?
|
|
|
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Actually I never kept it cos you become sick of S40 UI  But I change phone ALOT 
Phone?? What phone?? |
AntonioX
Joined: Apr 05, 2002
Posts: 134
PM |
hmm is this posting pictures thread from the iphone 4 or is it slating the iphone thread,
I mean there is like 4 or so pictures then every thing else is slating the pictures. no wounder why no one else is posting.
sorry but why dont you guys that's slating the phone make up ur own thread and call it how crap the iPhone 4 camera
is and go and post in there.....
[ This Message was edited by: AntonioX on 2010-06-26 18:11 ] |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Oh for gods sake chill out I already said I will stay off this thread cos I don't like it. Anyway what's a forum if you cannot disagree with anyone the world would be a boring place.
Phone?? What phone?? |
Indiandawg
Joined: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Mumbai
PM |
am not kidding but it's full of noise.
T200 -> T68i -> T610 -> K700i -> P910i -> W800i -> P990i -> M600i -> P1-> Nokia E71 -> X1i -> X10 -> Arc S -> Sony Z1 -> Sony Z Ultra -> Sony Z3+ -> iPhone 6 -> iPhone 7 Plus -> iPhone X -> iPhone XS Max |
AntonioX
Joined: Apr 05, 2002
Posts: 134
PM |
I'm not talking about you leaving or disagreeing with things here I'm saying is there is not many pics and I dont think there
will be because every one is slating the pictures, I've got a few pics to post but I'm not going to now because they will just get slated so there is no point...
[ This Message was edited by: AntonioX on 2010-06-26 18:54 ] |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
I think if you've made best effort to get a good pic its worth posting for critique. don't take the critique personally unless you've gone out of your way to take a bad pic in bad light etc... the idea of these topics is to discuss the quality produced by each camera phone and hopefully improve technique etc.
I do think the iPhone 4 has potential, and I'm especially happy with the video to the point that this fantastic weekend (weather wise) I'm putting together some clips of family, dogs, bbq etc using the iMovie app to send to my mum back home in Oz... and thats something I haven't been interested in doing before.
|
jj03
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
i know the iphone is capable of taking better pics. Like masseur said, the snap was just a point and shoot. I'm sure some adjustments will produce better quality. Btw, where are all the iphone guys? I expected to see a flurry of pics in this thread. Was looking forward to seeing snaps in different lighting conditions. |
phonecrzy
Joined: Jul 19, 2008
Posts: 478
PM |
Only video is good on the iPhone 4 imo, tbh i think even the photo's on my  K700i has better shots, ok maybe not K700i but K750i.
Age is just a number.. Being 13 makes me no dumber than a wise old man  |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Macworld had a shootout on both photo and video quality between the iPhone 4, Motorola Droid X, HTC EVO 4G and Samsung Galaxy. According to them the iPhone beat the other camera phones. You can read it here:
http://www.macworld.com/artic[....]2010/06/iphonecameratests.html
|
voda_jon
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
Now that vie been using the phone for a bit I am finding the images a little poor IF I transfer them to my computer. BUT looking at them on the phone itself they look fantastic.
Now I tend not to look at them on computer screen as I use my dslr for taking really good pics so am happy with the quality lol.
I suppose its good if apple haven't applied lots of post processing as this leaves us room to touch up the pics a bit if we want. |
gayannr
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 499
From: Sri Lanka
PM |
hmm. you have to take the results like this with a grain of salt 
c'mon the site is a mac site
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Ars Technica also posted a full review of the iPhone 4 including its camera. Here's a comparison of how it performs in low light compared the older iPhones: from left to right 3G, 3GS and 4:
(Source)
|
zide
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM |
Fashion but what an huge brick!
See my photos taken with the C902, Satio or E72 in here! |
voda_jon
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2010-06-29 02:05:44, zide wrote:
Fashion but what an huge brick!
Sorry? Come again! Lol.
The iPhone 4 is far from a brick. I see U have used a sati which is about the same size as the iPhone and it's actually smaller than the 3GS which wsant exactly huge either.
Now back to the topic... Ppl are amazed at the screen quality when they see the pics I have taken. |
|
|
Posted: 2010-06-26 14:07
