| Author |
X10 or Motorola Motorola XT720 ? Advice wanted |
woodsman
Joined: Feb 02, 2006
Posts: 4
From: Sweden
PM |
Hello
I can´t make up my mind, SE X10 or Motorola XT720? http://www.expansys.se/d.aspx?i=195242
I have no way to play with either of them, I´ll have to rely on what I can read about them on the web.
I prefer the design of X10, but two things trouble me:
from what I´ve read some reviewers reported the screen to be a bit unresponsive, and others said the housing to be to "plastic" and "squeacy" when pressed.
What do you think?
Thanks! |
|
|
rss_ndrsn
Joined: Aug 27, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
^The Motorola XT720 is better because it has a lot more to offer than SE Xperia X10. The biggest advantage of Motorola XT720 over X10 is the multi-touch support, which is what the cellphone OS's nowadays is about and will be for years. Motorola XT720 is a good choice if you are going to use it for quite some time. |
Mano82
Joined: Feb 03, 2009
Posts: 432
From: Norway
PM, WWW
|
On 2010-06-16 07:47:55, woodsman wrote:
Hello
I can´t make up my mind, SE X10 or Motorola XT720? http://www.expansys.se/d.aspx?i=195242
I have no way to play with either of them, I´ll have to rely on what I can read about them on the web.
I prefer the design of X10, but two things trouble me:
from what I´ve read some reviewers reported the screen to be a bit unresponsive, and others said the housing to be to "plastic" and "squeacy" when pressed.
What do you think?
Thanks!
I've never used Motorola but XT720 looking promising. Android 2.1, Multitouch, 8mp camera with Xenon flash, HD video recording. In the other hand SE X10 will get Android 2.1 & HD video recording in Q3 2010 & DLNA sharing in Q4 2010. I don't know how important multitouch is for you, But for me it's just Xenon flsh in Motorala which apealing me 
And screen on X10 is not unresponsive at all, i found it better than many other touch mobiles. And it's plastic but build quality is great 
From GSMarena:
The sensitivity of the display is great as well - just as you would expect in a capacitive touchscreen.
The build quality of the Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 is solid. The matt plastic on the back is quite fingerprint resistant and soft to touch. Although there are no metallic parts to strengthen the overall build quality, this actually turns out to be a good thing. The plastic used to craft the X10 body is excellent: strong and of very high quality. There are no creaks at all, and every single part of the body fits perfectly in its place. Thanks to the lack of metal the X10 is lighter than the HTC HD2 but doesn’t lose out in terms of design. |
rss_ndrsn
Joined: Aug 27, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Go for Motorola because X10 is hard to use when swiping the screen left and right or scrolling it up and down. Plus, it will not be as responsive as the phones with multi-touch when it comes to applications that use multi-touch. |
SKIBBE
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, Sk�vde
PM, WWW
|
@rss_ndrsn
never had any problems with swiping, i feel the oposite, its really great and fast. I think its just technique
also running R1FB001 ofc
[ This Message was edited by: SKIBBE on 2010-06-17 09:48 ] History
t20e > t68i(t68 f/w) > t610i > k700i > W900i > W960i > x10i > Current: Misty Silver Arc |
AndyD777
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Posts: 327
From: UK
PM |
At the moment id ether recommend the new Samsung Galaxy S or the Xperia X10 IMO.
I have had no problems with the touch-screen. However, I am running R1FB001 firmware and not the R1FA014 (Release software) |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
@rss- Have you ever friggin used the X10? If u havent, then STFU. |
|
|
Posted: 2010-06-16 07:47
