| Author |
T68 compares to the rest of the phones!! |
B@RTje
Joined: Jan 27, 2002
Posts: 143
From: holland
PM |
I think it's crap to compare the t68 to all other phones that come out now..
i read everybody saying i found a t68 killer!! it has this and that!!
but people forget that t68 is a year old! and other companies diddn't come with there phones till november 2002 or so..
just makes me mad sometimes so read it over and over again.. |
|
|
coolfighter
Joined: Jun 02, 2002
Posts: 176
From: coolfighter
PM, WWW
|
yeah
thats sucks man
i know that when Ericsson was in Market
Nokia was producing 8310 - 6310 - 6510 - 3330
siemens - C45 and rest
Samsung - ladies phone
none of this phones was color
so stupid people stop saying that t68 will get killed
and beside nokia they just release it this colors phones 7210 and ex..
but they look stupid and ugly and damn nice menu
I am proud Owner of - 688 - T28S - T29 - T39 - T68 - T68i - and now P800
|
energetic
Joined: Jan 13, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Athens, Greece, Europe, Earth,
PM, WWW
|
T68 was the top phone in the market last year and Nokia and the rest were absolutely crap!!
Not to mention that the P800 was presented an year an more ago!!!!
SONY ERICSSON rules!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
amagab
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Well, the Sony Ericsson T68i was voted the Best Mobile Phone of 2002 so that pretty much says it all.
|
B@RTje
Joined: Jan 27, 2002
Posts: 143
From: holland
PM |
Damn right ! 
|
sunjivas
Joined: Aug 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
and the Ericsson T68m was voted best mp 2001 wasnt it? |
mailliw_17
Joined: Dec 15, 2002
Posts: 316
From: Sexmoan
PM, WWW
|
This message was posted from a T68i |
shithappens
Joined: Sep 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
PM |
wat a load of crock!!! the  t68 still reigns supreme.....click
here
to see the review done by TechTV in Dec 2002...
_________________
Do you know why they call it "PMS"? Becoz "Mad Cow Disease" was taken.
[ This Message was edited by: shithappens on 2003-01-29 04:08 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2003-01-27 18:05
