| Author |
Which Nokia has the best Reception/Signal? |
Merc_Man
Joined: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: U.K
PM |
Hi Peeps,
Does anyone know which Nokia has the best signal/reception?
Don't need a fancy phone, camera, mp3 etc etc. Just has to have solid reception.
Thanks.
|
|
|
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Nokia 6303 I have one as a spare phone. It has fab signal & great battery life  The signal is solid everywhere on it & it sticks to the network like a limpet!!!!!!!!
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2009-11-09 14:40 ] Phone?? What phone?? |
brys182
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Posts: 246
From: Negative Space
PM, WWW
|
try 1100 
good battery life and signal reception.
Don't be so quick to judge me, you only see what I choose to show you. |
Marly
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands
PM |
On 2009-11-10 02:57:01, brys182 wrote:
try 1100
good battery life and signal reception.
Or 1600, same qualities, but not so old 
"America: please don’t be a Dumpfkopf" |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
Nokia N79 and E75 have fantastic reception and battery life from my experience. . E75 can be a bit of a pain to hold for longer useage though, the metal batt cover sticks out a bit on both sides,realy not friendly to the hands.
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
gayannr
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 499
From: Sri Lanka
PM |
OK. one question . What SE phone has the best signal reception 
|
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
If you can find an old k800i or k810i them two phones had the best most solid reception i ever had in any phone. The k800i was flawless but alot of Sony Ericsson's newer phones are worse and pretty poor for reception imo. They tend to put the antenna at the bottom so when you hold it the signal drops. The c510 is terrible dont get that.
Phone?? What phone?? |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
NOKIA also do that,its unbelievable, why on earth are they putting antennas at the bottom? Its so stupid, N81 has an antenna at the bottom and although 98% of the time its signal is great,sometimes it fluctuates like mad in bad areas where 3G is patchy when i hold it, so much so that i know exactly where the antenna is,at the bottom left coner under the star key  . The K850i's antenna is at the top,and its signal is always on point. makes no sense to put the antenna at the bottom.
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
The Nokia 6303 has its antenna @ the top & its one of the best I ever had for getting reception. They seem to have improved it in the 6th edition of s40 interface. I think they are putting them in the bottom of the phones because of lack room at the top due to cameras & such things. At least the pointy big antenna days are gone
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2009-11-10 16:06 ] Phone?? What phone?? |
Merc_Man
Joined: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: U.K
PM |
Thanks for the replies guys
Anyone have any experience of the Nokia 6700?
|
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
No but its very similar in terms of performance to the younger brother 6303. I have read people complaining of poor signal on the 6700 but i think its because people have 3G on and its probably poor coverage in my guess.
Phone?? What phone?? |
|
|
Posted: 2009-11-09 15:31
