Esato

Forum > General discussions > Product reviews > GSM Arena C901 review. Finally.

Author GSM Arena C901 review. Finally.
gayannr
Xperia Mini Pro Black
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 499
From: Sri Lanka
PM
Posted: 2009-10-07 07:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
OK, we all have been waiting for this . Enjoy fellas

http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_c901-review-401.php
[ This Message was edited by: gayannr on 2009-10-07 06:36 ]
Rookwise
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Mar 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK. Phone:Samsung Galaxy A54 5
PM
Posted: 2009-10-07 09:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
It's already been mentioned in the C901 discussion thread yesterday :) Also my own mini review can be found in the Reviews section on Esato.

This message was posted from a C901
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2009-10-07 09:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Very nice review, though i finally realized how good 6700 camera is. Although C901 is a step in the right direction but looking at the slight smearing and noise on its daylight images I can say it's not as clean as 6700's. the colors are also pumped to a level that the "naturality" is compromised.
10 years at Esato
crossmatched
C901 Silver
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: RP
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-10-07 17:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i have downloaded the sample pics of 6700 and c901 both from gsmarena.
imo the same scene/pics taken by both camphones should not be pitted against each other as a basis for camera performance.
a more scientific and quality controlled testing is more preferrable.

the pics posted by the gsmarena team were taken in varied instances.
some were taken in broad daylight, some late in the afternoon, some where taken in a different angle, different position etc etc.


post processing of c901 imo is better than 6700 classic

see the resolved details in the foliage of the trees at this photo captured by C901:



compared to this, by 6700 classic:



see the leaves of the tree near the 'Marseille" shop.
and also the greeneries in the center island of the two streets
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2009-10-07 17:07 ]
www.secondmanonthemoon.blogspot.com
we are all works under progress
gayannr
Xperia Mini Pro Black
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Posts: 499
From: Sri Lanka
PM
Posted: 2009-10-08 06:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
6700 shot seems blurred
hgautam
Sony Xperia X Performance
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-10-08 09:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Between pics taken with C901 and 6700C, it's very difficult to judge which of the 2 has better picture quality as there is difference in Angle, Distance, Time and also Season... In most of the pics the pic quality seems almost the same, in some C901 seems better (as the one above) and in some 6700C seems better (like the crop below):

C901:


6700C:


Overall from GSM Arena's pics, both seem to have equally good camera hardware but the C901 seems to have more post processing(in terms of NR and sharpness) and less accurate colors(white balance issue) than 6700C... Don't know why but pics in C901's picture thread has almost nil NR???

Bottomline, IMO the difference in picture quality between these two is very minor but the Xenon Flash and Lens Cover on C901 gives it a significant advantage...
[ This Message was edited by: hgautam on 2009-10-08 08:30 ]
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2009-10-08 09:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@crossmatched:

the reason is simple, the lens on 6700 has some misalignment thus it looked the out of focus. but we compare post processing here, the sharpening and noise is all handled very well on 6700. c901 exhibits color boost as well thus the image looked punchy - but unnatural to a trained photographer's eyes, and C901 has higher noise level theres no doubt that c901 has excellent camera, but i have to admit that post processing wise 6700 is the phone to beat.

c901


6700
10 years at Esato
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-10-08 11:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
is 6700c camera unbeatable? don't forget about Moto Zn5 some other Nokia phones have issue with lense too, 6700c is not the first phone with weird blur in some part of pictures, however details and colors are impressive

ohh and by the way... pictures from C901 sometimes are underexposed what looks bad
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-10-08 10:27 ]
mriley
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2010-01-31 01:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Another review of the C901
http://translate.google.co.uk[....]%2Fforum%2Fforum%2F314-c901%2F
"c901 Presentation"
[ This Message was edited by: mriley on 2010-01-31 00:16 ]
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!
-------------------
Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can
mriley
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2010-02-02 22:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Another (includes pics taken with C901 @ huge size)
http://translate.google.co.uk[....]earch%3Fq%3Dse-world%26hl%3Den
"C901/c902/c903/w902" --> "Initial Experience with C901"

http://www.phonebattles.com/s[....]sson-c901-youll-love-it-2.html
[ This Message was edited by: mriley on 2010-04-18 23:17 ]
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!
-------------------
Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi