| Author |
C901 vs C902 camera quality |
domipost
Joined: Mar 18, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Leiden, Netherlands
PM, WWW
|
I'd be interested to see your pics, @mode.
@abubasim
IMO the W902 pic is worse there and that's not only because of the lighting, I think. But I might be wrong there. But however, maybe my experience is wrong or my W902 sample was faulty, no big point imo. |
|
|
titus1
Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: here
PM, WWW
|
...
[ This Message was edited by: titus1 on 2009-09-02 01:04 ] |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
Hey...wait...what we call this topic? C901 vs C902? Or W902 vs C902? Lets back to our topic guyz.
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Since no one could produce comparison shots C901 vs C902 (even the OP, just him posting an opinion, in a pact with plankgatan I presume) I figured C901 vs W902 would be the same. But we have differing opinions whether this is correct.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
the thing i noticed directly when i tried c901, was it had a bit problems to get the whitebalance correct. (c902 adjust itself easier).....quite often the pics got quite bleached, (clouds, sky, etc, got really pale). it handle red colour better though.
i think c902 strongest side is its accurateness, such as focus, whitebalance, etc.
as you see in this test c902 have similar colour saturation as Nikon D80, (which tells quite much about C902 awesome accurateness)
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=186881
also C902 beat N95-1 in accurateness (focus, whitebalance).............see test here 
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=185486
overall i would say.......C902 have a better camera then C901. (when i compared macro i clearly saw the different in colour-quality)...........(otherwise i would had C901 long long time ago)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-09-03 09:23 ] |
Pitzon
Joined: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Sweden
PM |
I rest my case
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30016190@N05/sets/72157619671471546/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30016190@N05/sets/72157621163820522/
c901 is MUCH better allrounder. Plank must have got some really bad phone to test out I felt my c901 beat the c902 hands down. Much greater % of good pics and much more accurate focus and exposures.
Almost no pic got useless of the hundreds i took with it. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
no offence. but when you look inside the photo section on c901 macro pictures they often looks pretty unreal, (weird colours, nearly cartoonish look)....(really).
and to be honest. i never seen some macro by c901 with this quality (neither in form of colours or accurateness)
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=20160
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-09-03 09:37 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-09-03 09:18:28, plankgatan wrote:
i think c902 strongest side is its accurateness, such as focus, whitebalance, etc.
as you see in this test c902 have similar colour saturation as Nikon D80, (which tells quite much about C902 awesome accurateness)
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=186881
Big difference between D80 and C902. D80 much better color. C902 white balance more yellowish.
No offence but we all know all too well how much you love your C902 but comparing it with a Nikon DSLR is a bit too much. Why not throw in some full size crops to make it more of a challenge?
|
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
are you sure you didn't use mod camdriver in your C902?
|
mrjulius
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Pleasant Hills, Manila
PM, WWW
|
 Xperia Arc S, AinoU10i, x10m, c902, k750i,  |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
Hahaha...everyone gave their single photos here...how to compare if just single camphone result being put in here? Wait until i got my pc...i will do so...
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
@mrjulius: Very sharp at 0.7 megapixel... Now, where's the C901 comparison shot to this?
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-09-03 13:06 ] |
mrjulius
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Pleasant Hills, Manila
PM, WWW
|
properties
Xperia Arc S, AinoU10i, x10m, c902, k750i, |
mrjulius
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Pleasant Hills, Manila
PM, WWW
|
hehee
[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2009-09-03 16:15 ] Xperia Arc S, AinoU10i, x10m, c902, k750i, |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
mrjulius|you didn't tell us, is it took from stock standard camdriver or mod one?
Here C901...
Taken by c96sthl (post at other topic before, credits goes to him)
Credits goes to pakhusin, posted at other topic before.
|
|
|
Posted: 2009-09-01 22:46
Xperia Arc S, 
