Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > How about the quality of photo taken from C905 ?

Author How about the quality of photo taken from C905 ?
conan_4869
Model not set
Joined: Jul 06, 2009
Posts: 2
PM
Posted: 2009-07-07 18:34
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Hi I'd like to buy my new C905

because i prefer a c905 design compare to the others

but i'll afraid i can't get the best pic quality if i use C905

how about the photo quality (In latest FW)

compare to NOKIA N86 / Pixon (these are my choices)

(In my mind i prefer C905 is the best according to design /function of cybershot and user friendly menu)

Thx
conan_4869
Model not set
Joined: Jul 06, 2009
Posts: 2
PM
Posted: 2009-07-07 18:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
p.s. and how about the pic quality compare to C901

at the same resolution (for example 5 MP)

which one is better ?

Luhccas-U1a
Satio Black
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-07-07 20:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Functions and good camera = c905
Excellent camera = c901
100% crops of c901 is better than c905(details,sharpness etc)
C905 have just nightmode better than the c901.
Edit: I like the macros too.The picture get a "soft touch" due the post processing.Sharp but clean.
[ This Message was edited by: luhccas-c905 on 2009-07-07 19:47 ]
is a lifestyle!
max_wedge
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-07-08 04:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
And beter than Nokia N96 in my view. Not just more megapixels, actually better quality also. And really good macro mode.
soane28
K800 Black
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM
Posted: 2009-07-08 05:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Shoot me if you wish but have a look at LG Renoir! Excellent camera, much sharper than C905!
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2009-07-08 06:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@max_wedge
Are you sure about the macro mode? I honestly prefer the C702's macro since it has a smaller aperture. And my photos show that too, but it may be just me.

Anyway, long time no see!
pakhusin
C901 Silver
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Posts: 277
PM
Posted: 2009-07-08 08:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
take a look at a photo by samsung ultra touch here.. macro shots in dim light.. no need to turn led on..



also here (brighter light condition)


[ This Message was edited by: pakhusin on 2009-07-08 07:11 ]
Love more hate less
max_wedge
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-07-10 01:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-07-08 06:51:48, gtr83 wrote:
@max_wedge
Are you sure about the macro mode? I honestly prefer the C702's macro since it has a smaller aperture. And my photos show that too, but it may be just me.

Anyway, long time no see!
You could be right I haven't used the c702 to compare. SE have always had a very good macro mode on all their phones. Even the macro mode on my old K750 is still pretty good.

Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi