| Author |
J.R.G SOUND, wbxml acoustic |
Hiron
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Denpasar - Bali, Indonesia
PM |
@number1,
what did you change with phf files? I noticed now it's ver 15 instead of 10...
Could you make a changelog? 
And did you already download w995 acoustic?
@tranced,
thanks for the info
EDIT:
CSPV15 isn't suitable for older A2 phones... In my T700, the volume is normal, but in K850, it would blow your headset due to extremely high volume... HK.SPKRN is set to C0, which is the highest volume value for older A2 phones 
CSPV10: Flat frequency response with decent bass and clarity, suitable for instrumental music... Better stereo widening effect...
CSPV15: Agressive bass and treble, suitable for Rock and Pop music... Worse stereo widening effect if compared to CSPV10...
Number1, can you hear an alert beep sound through your headset when you plugged your headset to your phone? I can't hear it in CSPV15... But can hear a beep in CSPV10...
Maybe it's a good idea to upload both versions
Hiron
[ This Message was edited by: Hiron on 2009-05-30 19:18 ] |
|
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
i dont have a phone to test them, that beep was annoying anyway, not bothered about stereo widing its pretty pointless anyway, i borrowed a freq string and some layout and a couple of values from the w995 acoustics, it seems to have worked well, i maxed out the volume in the farfields and there ok assumed the headsets would also be ok. Old version is still on my 4shared and what headset are you using?. |
Hiron
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Denpasar - Bali, Indonesia
PM |
Without phone to test, both of them (v10 and v15) are still a great acoustic... I can't imagine if you had the phone to test 
Both of them has its own taste...
I use ver.10 now because I like flat frequency response better, although most people who hears pop and rock could find v.15 to be more pleasing...
Besides, v.15 has an aggressive treble which could be more fatiguing for long-session hearing
I used HPM-85 and HPM-77 to test it... About these headset, I love HPM-85 more than HPM-77, simply because HPM-77 was in-ear headset... 30mm driver size in HPM-85 vs 7mm in HPM-77... Much more power and clarity in HPM-85...
Besides, In-ear tends to makes our ears damage faster than ordinary headphones, due to nearer distance between driver and your ears membrane... The most safe way is by using active speaker, of course...
Hiron |
pavoo
Joined: May 03, 2007
Posts: 139
From: The 3rd World
PM |
J.R.G sound, CSBV10 (bluetooth)
are this for bluetooth stereo?
|
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
i didnt backup the original acoustic. never thought i had to go back  
On 2009-05-30 19:22:57, number1 wrote:
@tranced , could you upload all the lastest C702 farfields files please , then il make a acoustic for the mono speakers.
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
New beta added to first post, for mono speakers made for C702, C510 & C902 , unsure about others. |
Junz
Joined: Jul 31, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: INA
PM |
this's great N1, i tried it on my brother C902.
if there's possible, it's much better to increase little bit treble in PHF (J.R.G sound, CSPV15). so, the sound will balance in hpm-77
thanks b4.
[ This Message was edited by: Junz on 2009-05-31 17:57 ] |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
Thanx for mono acoustic...will try it and give some comment.
And...always waiting for desktop speakers also...hope you launch it soon. |
pavoo
Joined: May 03, 2007
Posts: 139
From: The 3rd World
PM |
J.R.G sound, CSPV15 (PHF'S for headsets)
are this acoustic made for HPM-70?
|
pakhusin
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Posts: 277
PM |
here is original acoustic for C702 from R3EA037.
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ii2tv2uz4z2
ur beta farfield_play.wbxml isn't working for my C702..
sounds like a broken radio.. zzzzzzzzzzzghhhhgrrrrrrrr... 
so i put up original farfield and it works like normal.
[ This Message was edited by: pakhusin on 2009-06-01 08:24 ] |
hi2vino
Joined: May 03, 2009
Posts: 19
PM |
CAN i use it for W910i  |
Luhccas-U1a
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
CAN i use it for W910i
Read the first page.
================================
The farfields for mono speakers distorts a lot on c905 and c702.
 is a lifestyle! |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
My Beta farfield seems too powerful and wrongly tuned for the hardware, il make a new 1 later. |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
the beta aint working here. got the same problem. didnt back up the previous farfield_play 
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
I updated the beta farfield, theres now a completly new version (first post). |
|
|
Posted: 2009-05-30 19:47
jay0726 | 
