Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > W810i Or C510 Camera Picture Quality ?

12  Next
Author W810i Or C510 Camera Picture Quality ?
fluke9
Samsung Galaxy S III
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
Posts: 461
From: Sarf Lundun UK
PM
Posted: 2009-05-26 21:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Which has the best quality ???

I suspect W810i.
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
in full sunshine i get good pics with my old w810

c510 have a bit more smooth picture-quality(similar to c702), w810 is more to K750 (a lot of colours when its optimal light)

best allround camera have easily c510. but w810 is just slightly behind (and like i said, great in good light)


ps. one thing who is lightyears better on c510 is of course the lens cover. (my w810 (like most older w810) have got scratches on the lens and the UV-film is nearly gone)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-26 22:28 ]
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i find it's actually the other way round outdoors, i much prefer the c510 pics are sharp and pretty well detailed, but in low-light i much rather the w810, the c510 has a smaller aperture so low light pics are alot more difficult the w810 has a bigger aperture and less megapixels on it's sensor so low-light pics are actually very good compared to most camphones miles better than the c510. Best all round is the w810 .
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i get shitty lowlight with my w810 (just for the record

ps.........buy a k800/k810 or c902/w902 if you want good(better) lowlight

pss.........i understand what you mean though, Nr.1.
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-26 22:34 ]
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:34
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Your the only 1 , my k750 was the only phonecam i could actually use in low-light , i guess you prefer smeared to hell rather than sharp and detailed thats why you have a c902.
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
wait a minute...that's 2 different things.

i have both a cid36 k750 (bought it same week it was release here) and a w810 (cid49 or cid52 i dont know). and its BIG different between them in lowlight (just for the record

and yes, C902/w902 have excellent lowlight with a bit skill (especially up to ~iso-250...further it gets a bit harder)
(i call this sharp and well detailed lowlight quality)
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19574
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-26 22:51 ]
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2009-05-26 23:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I had a old cid:36 k750 ,Not much difference between that and the w810 very very simlar sony 2mp cammodule, results are also very much the same.

Thats not really low-light as theres clearly a strong light souce, the strong processing shows up in the darker areas.
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2009-05-27 00:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
??????? not really a lowlight ?????
if you shoot a picture in iso-200 IT IS LOWLIGHT. (its shot in complete darkness with a tiny 15w lamp beside it, if you wonder)

what about iso-500 (now we really testing the limit of a cellphone i would never get this quality with my w810 at night in iso-500. thats for sure.
http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/1074/200903152131qzn837.jpg

anyway...i would rather buy c510 for a better allround camera
domipost
Hazel
Joined: Mar 18, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Leiden, Netherlands
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-05-27 00:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
W902 was shit in low-ligt, is my experience. W810 was much better. But for overall cam performance and usability, go for C510.
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-05-27 03:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
My c510 is great outdoors and pathetic indoors unless its fairly close up shots with the flash its fine. I remember having a w810 and the 'flash' was actually better in the dark than the c510 one. But overall the c510 is better more advanced and clearer picture.
Phone?? What phone??
code28h4p
Xperia Mini Pro Black
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2009-05-27 05:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Outdoor: C510
Indoor/lowlight:W810i
fluke9
Samsung Galaxy S III
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
Posts: 461
From: Sarf Lundun UK
PM
Posted: 2009-05-27 09:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Thanks all.

Need a cheapy with reasonable pic quality, the W810i still has good pic quality even after nearly 4 years use. and C510's are only £99ish at Carphone Warehouse.

Is it true all Carphone Warehouse phones are unlocked ???
pt020
W800
Joined: Aug 14, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Amsterdam NL
PM
Posted: 2009-05-27 12:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I think the W800/810 have the best 2MP camera on the market.
this pictures i made with my old W800
night picture

day

[ This Message was edited by: pt020 on 2009-05-27 11:58 ]
Luhccas-U1a
Satio Black
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-05-27 13:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-05-27 00:03:36, plankgatan wrote:
??????? not really a lowlight ?????
if you shoot a picture in iso-200 IT IS LOWLIGHT. (its shot in complete darkness with a tiny 15w lamp beside it, if you wonder)

what about iso-500 (now we really testing the limit of a cellphone i would never get this quality with my w810 at night in iso-500. thats for sure.
http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/1074/200903152131qzn837.jpg

anyway...i would rather buy c510 for a better allround camera



I've seen pictures with iso800 (from t650 for example) with better details than that.And you CAN'T use iso to determine what is low light.
I have pictures of sunlight situations with iso200,400 etc.And,is it low light?
I really like your pics with c902 but your efforts to ever say "they are the best in this,in that,bla bla bla" verge to ridicule...
is a lifestyle!
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2009-05-27 13:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
w810 is nice phone with OK camera,(not super good picture quality though). cant understand how you can say it take good indoor/lowlight, (been there, done that).
think the keypad and buildquality is the best thing. (lack of lens cover is the worse thing...the lens gets really smudgy and scratchy)

best 2 m.p. camera have first edition of k750 (and w800), w810 have more blurred/weak pic quality.

go for c510:
¤ MUCH better screen, (bigger and much more vibrant)
¤ better camera for normal photographing, (if you are a full size sucker ??? buy a DSLR camera )
¤ lens cover
¤ A200
¤ a lot more features


ps...luhccas-c905. just one tiny little thing. I never say "my" pics are best (im not that stupid). I (sometimes) say C902 take "best"/great pics .....thats 2 different things
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-27 12:50 ]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi