| Author |
What C905 sound like? |
JethroUK
Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 134
PM |
Got my eye on C902 to replace my w890i
I want 5 mp camera
I must have candy bar phones - slimmer = better for me
Problem with thin phones is speaker quality - whilst my w890i sounds great through phones it sounds total pants thru speaker (£25 phone would sound better)
C905 is only 10.5 mm thin (only 0.5 thicker than w890)
What C905 sound like???
Any other candy bar Sony sound better - dont mind going couple mm thicker
[ This Message was edited by: JethroUK on 2009-03-20 20:41 ] |
|
|
ocean21
Joined: Nov 30, 2007
Posts: 217
From: Singapore
PM |
Do you mean C902, from what I've tried the SQ is really good, the characteristics is just like K810 or maybe K850. Million ways ahead than W890 which sounds not any better than a spoiled can.
For C905, it's further better though
iPhone 3GS |
HxH
Joined: Dec 26, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: GMT+7
PM |
For C902, speaker sound definitely better than your W890.
Very good for daylights shot, for low light if u don't compare with those xenon flash that not problem. |
suresh86
Joined: Jun 22, 2008
Posts: 201
From: Kathmandu,Nepal
PM, WWW
|
If u compromise little on camera, C702 would be better. It has bigger screen, good loudspeaker and a decent camera. And u save some money too.  |
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
The C702 is loud, very loud. I had to spend a few hours in my old house recently which is empty and I played some music on the C702 with an empty toilet roll on top, it gave the sound a little more bass/depth  Worked very well!
|
JethroUK
Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 134
PM |
On 2009-03-21 04:33:39, ocean21 wrote:
Do you mean C902, ...
Yes i did
.
On 2009-03-21 09:05:00, suresh86 wrote:
If u compromise little on camera, C702 would be better. ..
I notice C702 is 3.2 mp camera and about 15mm thick
I need 5 mp camera minimum and prefer less than 15 mm thick - but keep em comming
[ This Message was edited by: JethroUK on 2009-03-21 17:04 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2009-03-20 21:25
