| Author |
sony ericsson g900 vs nokia n95 comparison |
xperia.x1
Joined: Feb 15, 2009
Posts: 15
PM |
please tell me what is the Difference between SONY ERICSSON G900 vs nokia n95 image and video quality?and wich one is better on the capturing photo and video recording? |
|
|
kikawi
Joined: Dec 04, 2008
Posts: 29
PM, WWW
|
Hi my fiends in that topic
This message was posted from a LG-KG290 Obigo |
domipost
Joined: Mar 18, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Leiden, Netherlands
PM, WWW
|
N95 outperforms the G900 in every aspect, except the touchscreen and userfriendlyness. |
ardzuna
Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 467
PM |
G900 has better photo quality, but N95 is better in video recording - it has VGA video recording while G900 has QVGA.
G900 also has better sound quality and has more free RAM onborad (more than 70 MB while N95 has about 30 MB).
|
dastata
Joined: Dec 21, 2008
Posts: 16
PM, WWW
|
I had been playing with both phones. I can say I would choose sony. Great pictures you can take with it.
|
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
Mind posting some sample pics from the G900? |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
I happened to use and compare those two before (my friends had one).
Camera wise
N95 - punchy colours, very saturated but nice to eyes, no purple fringing, dynamix range is superior over G900, VGA recording is good. I can't tell which LED flash is superior between this and G900 though.
G900 - nice colours, bad JPEG compression (just like N95), nice details in daylight, suffers from small purple fringing, pretty slow camera performance, Touch AF is pretty good, video recording is fine as well but nothing to write home about.
SQ wise
both phones do fine in SQ, other than the pretty good and loud stereo speakers on N95 i can't see N95 being better than G900 in audio quality. both phones were weak compared to N81 anyway.
User Interface
Imho, G900 sports the best looking UIQ interface i've seen, far better than the awfully boring UI of N95(themed or not themed), but thanks to it's poor CPU the phone doesn't stand a chance against N95 performance wise. N95 needs more 2D/3D animations given its powerful CPU and Demand Paging feature! G900 has very good multitasking though, 128Mb RAM can do miracles!
Messaging
G900 has many messaging input type to use, stylus, finger touch(pretty hard because of smallish screen) and hardware keypad. N95 heavily relies on keypad, imo N95 has nicer and more comfortable keypad but G900 is not bad.
Build Quality
I hated N95 because of it's slider, and i usually prefer candybars(no moving parts) so G900 wins here imo.
Many people would say N95 wins but imo, both phones are fine, everyone has its weakness and strengths, just choose the one that suits your lifestyle. don't rely too much on others opinions as we all don't have the same tastes. 
~19 years at Esato |
rodka
Joined: Oct 04, 2008
Posts: 27
PM |
If you want a phone for the camera do NOT get the G900. Mediocre camera quality |
Punkid
Joined: Oct 17, 2008
Posts: 41
PM |
it doesnt matter wht other people say about a phone,jst get a phone which YOU like.if uve been using a sony ericsson phone i'd recommend not buying the n95 (i personally hate it)...i used to have w810 and bought an n95 and had to get rid of it in 2 days...i swear,indoor,its pictures are worst than a vga camera...video is good and outdoor pictures are really nice but the UI is same old boring s60
|
abdo
Joined: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 40
PM |
I WAN TEL U FRIEND THAT NOKIA IS NOTHING IN COMPARAISON VS SONY.RXSON .THIS SECOND IS THE BEST MARK AND THE BEST QUALITY
This message was posted from a SGH-E250 |
|
|
Posted: 2009-03-13 17:42
