| Author |
Processors list of all SE phones. |
w200
Joined: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 94
PM |
Hey I would appreciate if anybody could tell me which processor is used in which phone...
I know its an ARM processor, but would like to know which model (and other specifications) of that processor in which phone...
I googled my query and could just find that W and K series use ARM926EJ-S...
with a speed of 220 MIPS @ 200 MHz... (source:-wikipedia)
I dont have much knowledge about the processors and its parts but just want to know more about them...
Links to detailed explanations will be appreciated...
Regards |
|
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
world best webiste for Benchmark, performance details and other tech spec for your cellphones.....
just browse your model into the list and Voila, everything comes up...very nice 
http://www.jbenchmark.com/latest_results.jsp?benchmark=pro
example;
|| c902 ARM9 is clocked at 169 mHz || c905 at 149 mHz || w200 at 110 mHz ||
((Java benchmark 1.0= c902: 7573.......c905: 6638......W200: 5126))
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-13 17:18 ] |
mediar
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
Why C905 has worse CPU that C902?
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
c902 have a bit stronger CPU then C905......its just how it is.
|
w200
Joined: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 94
PM |
@plankgatan
thanks for the website link... i never knew all those details... |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Those results are useless, and cannot be deemed truthful. The results are based on a variety of factors, including running applications, background processes, the phone's JP version, how many CPU cycles that are available for the application, how much memory is left on the phone, how many messages and contacts are stored on the device, and so on.
You should think of the results as a minimum clock frequency rather than anything else.
Just noticed the site says "JBenchmark ACE - (ARM CPU Estimator) estimates mobile CPU class and clock rate in MHz". That just goes to prove my point.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2009-03-13 19:31 ] |
w200
Joined: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 94
PM |
All right... got the point mizzle... so i just have the rough idea about each phone's capability and their comparison.. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
well, you asked for facts about cellphone CPUs, (type, clock rate, etc), and you got them.
this website is quite fun, they have nearly ALL brands ~ models of all cellphones.....
|
yea g
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
|
Problem is, the more features on the phone, the less use of the phones processor gets used by java, thus the estimator gives high values on low end phones and low values on high end phones. Part of the reason c905 scored less than c902 (cause of the added wifi+gps) and k610 has a much higher score than both
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
well, i still think its weird that SE stake on a slower CPU in c905 then c902.
c902 CPU is clocked at 169 Mhz. thats 20 Mhz faster then c905. (which make some different especially IF we talking about multi tasking, etc).
ps. both phones have same Internal memory (160 MB)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-13 20:28 ] |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
Well owning both the K850i and C905, I can tell you that there is a huge difference in the performance so processor speed alone isn't the only factor by which they can be judged.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
well, i also own k850, c902, etc, etc, etc.......... AND i tried c905 many times.
i dont agree that k850 runs MUCH slower then c905, (c905 is faster but not that much).
the speed depends FIRST OF ALL of the firmware, (a less bugg-free, better optimized firmware make the UI run faster & smoothly).....
K850 have a stronger CPU then c905, BUT a more buggy firmware, thats why it maybe feels a bit slower.....(K850 have also 40 MB internal memory against c905/C902 160 MB)
edit....one thing i know for sure, is that C902 with latest firmware runs quick like Hell 
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-13 20:48 ] |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
Well I have the latest fw's on both phones and there is still quite a difference - having the media playing and doing anything else seemed to overwhelm the K850i somewhat. The C905 doesn't seem to have any issue with this.
Maybe its just my phone, I know the quality is inconsistent to say the least but I get your point.
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
You just don't get it, do you, plankgatan?
|
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
Yep,those results dont seem reliable at all, it claims the N78 has a ARM9 CPU, which is completely wrong. Im pretty sure the K850, C902 and C905 run the same CPU, BUT like said above things like software optimization can a play a part, the C905 has probably been optimized to run smoothly even at lower clock rates to save battery. I highly doubt SE would give their newer flagships weaker hardware than older ones.
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
|
|
Posted: 2009-03-13 16:20
