| Author |
Comparison of K790i with K770i |
jawaadn
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
Posts: 1
PM |
Which one is best according to its features specially camera. |
|
|
centur
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-12-23 12:20:22, jawaadn wrote:
Which one is best according to its features specially camera.
K790 ( K800 ) with xenon flash is better.
|
chuaherson
Joined: Sep 10, 2008
Posts: 114
From: Novaliches, Quezon City
PM, WWW
|
K790
having the opportunity to speak doesnt always give us the privilege to be understood... |
enk39
Joined: Oct 27, 2008
Posts: 120
From: NZ
PM |
yup, k790 |
moedjs
Joined: Mar 05, 2007
Posts: 4
PM |
I rather choose K770, it has advantages: flash menu and swf support, d-pad, and slimmer againts K790 disadvantages: joystick that will corrupt some time, awefull lens cover design, no swf support. |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
The K770's camera does not apply much post-processing on the pictures so, although a little noisier than the K790's photos, some people (me! anyone else?) prefer these as they tend to look more natural at full size.
|
moedjs
Joined: Mar 05, 2007
Posts: 4
PM |
Yeah .. Ive seen the comparison on mobile-review.com ..
but again .. you have to pay that with the joystick and lens cover issue for a little more natural photo .. |
idumbakumar
Joined: Oct 01, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: chennai,india.
PM |
straight away k800i. bec k800i itself having small screen. now this k770i has some more small!! and the disaply is not bright and colorful as k800i. it yellowish. coming to camera it has better xenon flasa. also u ill have play/pause button.
but k770i keypad is verygood. and the bluebeam when camera opens is prettty nice. |
Junz
Joined: Jul 31, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: INA
PM |
for the camera k790 better than k770 |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
On 2008-12-25 10:09:30, AbuBasim wrote:
The K770's camera does not apply much post-processing on the pictures so, although a little noisier than the K790's photos, some people (me! anyone else?) prefer these as they tend to look more natural at full size.
me to 
OnePlus 8 |
SaLiH
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 460
From: Bosnia & Herzegovina
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-12-25 10:09:30, AbuBasim wrote:
The K770's camera does not apply much post-processing on the pictures so, although a little noisier than the K790's photos, some people (me! anyone else?) prefer these as they tend to look more natural at full size.
Me too!  |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
yep, me too. I like Samsung cameras
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
I agree about Samsung. They have a different approach to noise reduction. They seem to use Gaussian instead of Median filter. This doesn't smudge out the noise in the same way. Where a Nokia or SE camphone kills a lot of detail to get rid of the noise, a low light Samsung camphone photo will instead look a bit blurry. The result looks better.
Here's an comparison between Samsung D900 and SE K800 taken from M-R's review of the 3 MP camera in the D900:
K800:
Original: http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]ung/d900/photo/k800i/00558.jpg
D900:
Original: http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]900/photo/photo2/photo0021.jpg
Only the most stubborn SE fanboi would say that the K800 photo is better.
_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-12-25 12:49 ] |
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
I have both and I can say for certain that that K770i takes better pictures. The colors are MUCH better, and the pictures are far more detailed. The K800 does take slightly sharper images, though that may just be the phone applying some post processing.
Though to be honest, the K800 is a better built phone. |
riffe
Joined: Aug 30, 2008
Posts: 30
From:
PM |
wow that was huge diffrence in thos pics |
|
|
Posted: 2008-12-23 12:20
