| Author |
SE-09-Portfolio |
yea g
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
|
It kinda depends on the phone I think. My K610's fastport was very loose after a year, yet my friends almost 2 year old W660's fastport is almost as good as my C905's one.
|
|
|
the-flash
Joined: Nov 09, 2007
Posts: 170
PM |
I've had my W800i for over 3 years and the fastport is still good.
Anyway this rumour about fastports are so exciting no? |
Angello
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
B2T please 
That's not the SE-09-Fastport-Complaint thread  |
yea g
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
|
Ok then heres my on topic:
Bring back m2 on Idou!!
|
Angello
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
do you have too much money left? |
king-james
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: M.I.A.M.I
PM |
On 2009-04-14 23:56:18, yea g wrote:
Ok then heres my on topic:
Bring back m2 on Idou!!
But why? Micro-SD are faster (SDHC).
[ This Message was edited by: murderjon on 2009-04-14 23:08 ] |
Angello
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
and cheaper |
king-james
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: M.I.A.M.I
PM |
yes |
yuunanase
Joined: Sep 30, 2006
Posts: 290
From: utopia
PM, WWW
|
But M2 has much better build quality than SDHC
[ This Message was edited by: yuunanase on 2009-04-15 02:21 ] venus, kiki, vulcan, rachael, anzu, akane, nozomi, hikari, hayabusa, tsubasa, yuga, togari, honami, sirius, leo, ivy, surime |
yea g
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
|
I don't got no micro sd's, and like 70% of the micro sd's in NZ are fake.
|
HxH
Joined: Dec 26, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: GMT+7
PM |
IS it good next generation  phones will go for MicroSD?
Anyway I prefer M2.
SONY x Sexy x Sleek x Solid x Stunner x Stylish : Nozomi/Kagura with Love. |
moogoo
Joined: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: NYC
PM, WWW
|
I prefer M2 b/c i just bought a 16gb m2 card and if all the new phones go microSD, i will have wasted my money! |
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2009-04-14 21:15:05, se_love wrote:
If you dont know the phones emit certain toxic radio waves or radioactive waves(cant remember which) that harm your *cough* area.
No. Well, give me the source because that is mostly likely 100% wrong.. |
se_love
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Well then you need to search it up. Many sites could tell you how harmul cellphones are to both the brain and other body areas. Which is why I text message much more then I do talk on my cellphone. |
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2009-04-15 11:09:57, se_love wrote:
Well then you need to search it up. Many sites could tell you how harmul cellphones are to both the brain and other body areas. Which is why I text message much more then I do talk on my cellphone.
Sure, I'll do the math for you too.
Energy for 1800Mhz radiowaves (used in cellphone networking) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gsm#GSM_Frequencies
Wavelenght = Lightspeed / freqency
Wavelenght = 3*10^8 / 1800*10^6
Wavelenght for 1800Mhz = 0.16667 meters
Energy = Plancks constant * Lightspeed / Wavelenght
Energy = 6.63*10^-34 * 3*10^8 / 0.16667
Energy = 1.19*10^-24 Joule
Gamma radiation (radiation coming from nuclear plant restproducts or nuclear weapons) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_radiation
Wavelenght = 3*10^8 / 10^19
Wavelenght = 3*10^-11 meters
Energy = 6.63*10^-34 * 3*10^8 / 3*10^-11
Energy = 6.63*10^-15 Joule
I can't find any numbers that says how much energy from an electromagnetical wave that is needed to change or break down DNA or cellular materia in the body. If i remembered correctly from my physics class two years ago that energy were somwhere between gamma and cellphone.
Please correct what I wrote if it is totally wrong. (My fingers may have slipped on the TI-calculator) Maybe some of your sources states something else than what i just wrote?
This i way off topic so I will stop this now..!
....
On Topic: What happened to w350 sucessor? Twiggy? Was it cancelled?
|
|
|
Posted: 2009-04-14 23:01
