| Author |
P800 vs. 7650 pics |
Omar
Joined: Jan 05, 2003
Posts: 269
PM |
All pics are:
P800 = 640x480, High Quality, outdoor = outdoor, indoor = indoor
7650 = Standard, High Quality
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/p800smartphone2003
you judge.
[ This Message was edited by: Omar on 2003-01-09 13:45 ] |
|
|
Eleventy7
Joined: Jul 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: the rotten oasis
PM, WWW
|
ta m8, but it doesn't say which are which?
|
Omar
Joined: Jan 05, 2003
Posts: 269
PM |
it will in 5 minutes |
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
The Jpeg compression is different between the files (P800 and 7650).
Do you have the pics, with same compression rates?
Anyway, it seems quite similar. |
jcpsad
Joined: Oct 15, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
it's pretty much the same! |
Omar
Joined: Jan 05, 2003
Posts: 269
PM |
Originals available but not viewable on Yahoo except for "premium" members. Go figure.
[ This Message was edited by: Omar on 2003-01-09 22:22 ] |
chanmhg
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Posts: 168
From: HK
PM |
p800 is much better than 7650!!
After all who would want Nokia!!
Nokia is rubbish!! |
cyanx7
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Posts: 228
From: Porto, Portugal
PM |
chanmhg: i hear u man 
The garbage man is happy as a young maiden losing virginity...  I GOTTA GARBAGE THREAD WITH MY NAME ON IT! YEAH!  Shithappens just became my blood brother and Bjerkebanen my blood sister...  |
Rashkae
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
P800.  |
bigjobs
Joined: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 94
PM |
Very amusing, Nokia will wipe the floor with SE, Ericsson would have croaked long ago if Sony hadn't bailed them out.
The new SE, 7650 competitor is coming out just as the 7650 reaches the end of it's designed lifetime.
Sony will ALWAYS be behind Nokia. |
Omar
Joined: Jan 05, 2003
Posts: 269
PM |
Yes Nokia is ahead of Ericsson in marketing terms, they were first with logos, ringtones, pictures, etc. The flashy stuff, the kiddy stuff. But for real purposeful utilities in a phone, that's were Ericsson leads. I travel for a living and my life is closely attached to the contents of my phone.
Ericsson incorporated bluetooth first, they gave us a colour screen first, and unlike Nokia Sony Ericsson doesn't discard a feature from a phone when it releases a new one. For the power user (Sony) Ericsson is first and foremost. And I know what I'm talking about. I have one of those heavy, unwieldy things, a Communicator 9210i, Nokia's #1 business device. No bluetooth although bluetooth was around when it was released, I can't send all my contacts to another device wirelessly, I can't synchronize with a notebook wirelessly, I can't switch on infrared if the SIM is out (except to receive images in the album).... Shall I go on?
I've owned Ericssons: 337, 338, 688, t28, R380s, t68i and now P800.
Nokia: 8850 and Communicator. Bought a 7650 for my wife but not for me (get the point!)
Unfortunately Ericsson did not catch on to the importance of marketing until late in the game. I just hope it's not too late. But they have always made better, more functional phones. And that's why where it really matters Nokia will always be behind. But it's a twisted, shallow world in many aspects today and that's why (Sony) Ericsson is not even second best today.
[ This Message was edited by: Omar on 2003-01-10 17:33 ] |
contaygious
Joined: Jan 04, 2003
Posts: 322
PM |
There's not that much difference!!!!
People make the nokia out to be SOOOOOOOOOO much better when they are almost the same picture quality LOL
I HAVE A P800!!!!!!!!! |
pachy
Joined: Nov 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
@bigjobs, i`m using a p8 & l can`t sit back & read a post like yours without laughing at your ridiculous comparison, the only real comparison is the size (with 7650 keypad shut) they are simular size, oh & they both have a cam.
I can only guess that not only have you not read the p8 spec, but you have DEFFINATELY not used one, p8 is VERY similar to my old bluetooth ipaq in use ( fast & using todays technology), 7650 is just a big colour camera phone. they are EASILY 18mnths apart in their level of tech. |
|
|
Posted: 2003-01-09 14:43
