Author |
New Law Coming Stopping Phones Being Locked To Provider |
fluke9 Joined: Oct 31, 2006 Posts: 461 From: Sarf Lundun UK PM |
Anyone heard of this law regarding not allowing new phones to be network locked ???
Read it around some different forums ??
This for instance....
http://forum.vodafone.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=371
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: fluke9 on 2008-09-30 16:32 ] |
|
goldenface Joined: Dec 17, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Liverpool City Centre PM |
I heard something about this last year, something to do with the competition laws.
|
Dr_Jones Joined: Oct 03, 2008 Posts: 17 PM |
bad news for iphone eh??
|
titus1 Joined: Jul 27, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: here PM, WWW
|
good news for us |
gola Joined: Jul 17, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: South Africa PM |
On 2008-10-09 17:13:24, titus1 wrote:
good news for us
Ditto
"Getting wisdom is the wisest thing you can do!" Proverbs 4: 7 |
AbuBasim Joined: Nov 04, 2005 Posts: > 500 PM |
We have this law here in Oman and most other countries here in the Persian Gulf have the same AFAIK. The drawback is that all phones are unlocked and therefor also not subsidized by the operators.
|
soulsaber Joined: Mar 20, 2008 Posts: 86 From: Canada PM |
mm i would rather have locked phones that are subsidized than unlocked phones at full price
If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. |
Jools Joined: May 21, 2003 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2008-10-10 06:39:53, soulsaber wrote:
mm i would rather have locked phones that are subsidized than unlocked phones at full price
But how many different GSM network operators do you have to choose between in your country? And how often do you travel abroad where you might want to use an alternative SIM?
It's a hugely different situation here in Europe, where people have half a dozen or more providers to choose between and travel from country to country all the time.
|
soulsaber Joined: Mar 20, 2008 Posts: 86 From: Canada PM |
mm true...its a monopoly here, there is only one GSM carrier lol
If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. |
AbuBasim Joined: Nov 04, 2005 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2008-10-10 06:39:53, soulsaber wrote:
mm i would rather have locked phones that are subsidized than unlocked phones at full price
I doubt that the operators actually absorb the cost of the phones. You end up paying the same amount - if not more - for the phone if you complete the contract. See it as a way of paying for it in installments.
From AllAboutSymbian's article Unlocking the Mobile Phone: Why we need to go SIM-Free:
Myth 3: "Phones from network operators are cheap or free!"
And the truth is: They're not cheap or free at all!
Phones from network operators usually end up costing you more than if you bought them separately. You pay for these "cheap" or "free" phones in installments, as part of the monthly fee for using a phone service goes on paying for the "cheap" or "free" handsets. To top it all, the phone you get is locked to one network and sometimes crippled in some way, so it's not even as functional as a SIM-free model.
There are already many different forms of consumer credit for people who want to buy something in installments, such as credit cards, bank loans and store credit. These services are regulated by the government and in direct competition with each other, so they usually offer better and clearer terms than phone network operators. You'll see exactly what you're paying for, you'll be able to buy absolutely any compatible phone model from any retailer whether the operator approves or not, it won't have its functions restricted by the operator, and you'll probably end up paying less for it overall.
_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-10-11 05:52 ] |
totalgsm Joined: Jan 12, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: totalgsm.org PM, WWW
|
Bad news for our business if it happens lol
But Unlocked phones , I guess will cost more than locked ones.
You end up paying so less for a phone with contract.
|
|