| Author |
Telme phone |
mcpants
Joined: Apr 12, 2002
Posts: 106
PM |
http://www.telme.cc/en/t919/details.html
beat the t68i and why have we not heard of this phone!
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2003-01-11 10:45 ] |
|
|
anonymuser
Joined: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
more of a P800 competitor surely? can't really compare to a T68, they're two totally different phones. |
ste_dexter
Joined: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 86
From: Manchester, England
PM |
Is this a phone that has been made by a specific network?
Where is the .cc domain? |
Cytech
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM |
Tel Me is an Austrian company.
€415,83 (excl VAT) in their webshop... |
ste_dexter
Joined: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 86
From: Manchester, England
PM |
Ok, had a look at their website and it looks pretty good.
They have a distributor in the uk. £260+vat. Not bad at all.
Take it that that is a sim free price to companies and that they dont sell to the public. But if you have a vat number.....  |
T68iFan
Joined: Oct 18, 2002
Posts: 214
From: Los Angeles
PM |
Looks interesting, but I've never heard of the manufacturer... or is TelMe the provider??
Anyone hear of or use this phone? |
ste_dexter
Joined: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 86
From: Manchester, England
PM |
Looks like a newish company.
Good luck to them. Mite have to have a look at gettin one of them phones. MAybe while i wait for the p800  |
abudinsz
Joined: Jun 08, 2002
Posts: 63
From: USA
PM |
Unfortunately it isn't a world phone... can't believe they can make a high end phone and not put a damn 1900 mhz radio in it... oh well |
abudinsz
Joined: Jun 08, 2002
Posts: 63
From: USA
PM |
The OS also seems to lack quite a bit from what the p800 offers... that BTW is one big advantage of the platform  chose is that there are lots of 3rd party symbian os apps out there.
Ps. I just noticed that they don't have bluetooth support... so I guess the price difference is understandable... this is more of a low end camera/pda phone |
ste_dexter
Joined: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 86
From: Manchester, England
PM |
Still, not bad for a new company.
[ This Message was edited by: ste_dexter on 2003-01-06 22:38 ] |
ste_dexter
Joined: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 86
From: Manchester, England
PM |
Retract my last statement as my girlfriend has just said that she thinks it looks like a tape recorder/walkman. So thats what women will think you have placed on the table in the pub when you are on the pull, by all accounts
|
Omar
Joined: Jan 05, 2003
Posts: 269
PM |
Similar to the Samsung SPH-I300 but from experience with the P800 after removing the keypad and enabling the virtual flip I wouldn't want a permanent touch screen phone. The keypad is necessary sometimes when u can't reach for a stylus or use your fingers. Also all that exposed screen real-estate is a big accident waiting to happen. My opinion anyway. And yes, shouldn't be compared to the T68i which is old news now.
|
anonymuser
Joined: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
it shouldn't be compared to the t68 because, like the P800, it's a different sort of phone for a different sort of user. apples and oranges. me, i wouldn't swap, unless i was going to sell it straight on for a few more t68's |
Rashkae
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Plus, the camera's only 352 x 288 pixels |
ptx
Joined: Jan 07, 2003
Posts: 10
PM |
Has any of you seen and tried a real T919? Do you know anything of its OS, stability? |
|
|
Posted: 2003-01-06 22:13
