| Author |
K800 vs C902 pictures please |
imaticx
Joined: Nov 09, 2006
Posts: 107
From: Croatia
PM |
hi
i'm back from holiday and i see that thread have six pages  but still no direct comparisation of night pictures of k800 vs c902 
ok. day pictures wins c902
and somebody was talk that c902 have nothing new. a slim design, no camera slide opener, flash themes, speed....
|
|
|
DeviLLiciouS
Joined: Aug 18, 2008
Posts: 19
PM |
On 2008-08-25 21:56:41, imatic wrote:
hi
i'm back from holiday and i see that thread have six pages but still no direct comparisation of night pictures of k800 vs c902
ok. day pictures wins c902
and somebody was talk that c902 have nothing new. a slim design, no camera slide opener, flash themes, speed....
exactly |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
so im back after one week holiday in bannedladesh....lots of sun & drinks 
so i grabbed my friends k800 and took 8 pics with k800 and C902. (and please, dont start with "did you hold the camera still"...of course i did).
the problem is,(its no problem, its more fact) that of all 8 pics with k800, 4 became good, 2 got very blurred and 2 became just ok. (now i mean the focus), with C902 all 8 pics (belive or not) became sharp(normal).
im sitting right now with my girlfriends mobile broadband, so im uppload full size later, have fiber at home (it took ages to just upload this 1024 x 768 pics)
k800 low light
c902 low light
k800 cigg
c902 cigg
k800 roses
c902 roses
k800 close up
c902 close up
k800
c902
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-09 18:51 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Looks like there's a halo around bright out-of-focus objects in shots from your friend's K800, almost like there's a fingerprint on the lens. Not at all of the same quality as of the shots in Esato's gallery.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
???? here we go.
its not about smudge lens, its about accurate focus in less light.
compare the ones whos sharp instead.....(the only point K800 was(is) better on, is less noise in full size pictures)... everything else there is C902 little better. focus, colors, sharpness, details, etc.
also remember that this pics is shoot in early evening, which test the cameras more optimal then full sunshine.....
(c902 larger sensor handle less light in a better way, if it had been full sunshine, they had been more similar....
edit.. i will also say that ALL k800 pictures look sharp on the mobile screen, but not on the laptop screen.
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-09 19:41 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-09 19:13:07, plankgatan wrote:
???? here we go.
Sorry, I will refrain from posting my opinion in the future, unless of course I have something nice to say about your photos. Happy?
|
adnansanni
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM |
@plankgatan:
How was your Holiday? Bannedladesh sound likes Bangladesh. Are you carrying your phone in iPod Sock?
[ This Message was edited by: adnansanni on 2008-09-09 18:53 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
if my K800 would do such poor photos I would get rid of it immediately. of course I understand that if somebody want to shot weak photos then it's not a big problem (as we can see). test result 0/10
one more thing, you're skilled photographer right? what is wrong in first 2 pics? tip: it's something about light metering. identical scene? hmm, with strange coincidence C902 had better conditions than K800
moderators
what is the future of this thread? I don't see anybody who can post credible test of K800 and C902. maybe it's better to lock it before next 'too much words'?
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-09-10 10:03:15, Raiderski wrote:
moderators
what is the future of this thread? I don't see anybody who can post credible test of K800 and C902. maybe it's better to lock it before next 'too much words'?
"credible tests"...............thats suppose to funny ?????
read what i write, this pictures is taken in less light (evening), i can guarantee that even other k800 will behave like this in non optimal light.
(i can also guarantee that the camera didnt have smudge on the lens....hhmmm)
i did this test JUST to show the difference in smaller light-conditions. (everyone know that k800 and many other phones take good pics in perfect sunshine... im not interested of that here)
C902 handle less light better.....and thats my point here...nothing else
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-10 10:28 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
even at evening my photos without any tricks are much better than this from your friend's K800. I don't like them at all
I will try to spare people next barren discussion between us
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-09-10 10:31 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
do you really think this 2 pictures is incorrect ???? (im not so foolish so i deliberately make it worse)
(and like i said, everyone know k800 have a good camera, i just point out the difference)
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-10 11:16 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
it's something like this two:
it's not about K800 vs. C902 but about comparability of 2 shots even from the same camera. you know what is autoexposure and you know what is happening in scenes with very opposite illumination objects (ie. indoor vs. outdoor sunlight). point camera more at low illumination object and autoexposure together with light metering will increase ISO and exposure time. in your shots C902 was this one with a bit more light for light metering that's why ISO and exposure time ratio is better than in K800 shot, nevermind as I wrote earlier it's not about K800 vs. C902. overall quality? in this case it's better in C902 and will be better everytime for standard drivers. however blur level is this what is the most ugly thing, but it's not a global K800 problem, look like it's a problem of your friend's K800
|
recl
Joined: Nov 25, 2007
Posts: 251
From: Romania
PM |
in the k800 pic you can clearly see the light in the room is turned on while in the c902 the only light coming in the room is natural light through the window :| |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
In this comparison there’s only one pic with the same “identical” scene (the last pic).
Plank, how can you say that it’s a fair comparison? There isn’t one K800 pic like yours (even with your “smaller light condition”) in Esato photo gallery, how do you explain it?
Do you think people can trust your photos or the others?
Do you remember your comparison between C902 and 6220c? Was it difference?
Everybody know the answers here, your thread is “Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone”...
And like recl said in the first pic there is the light and the tv turned on...
P.S.: However i’m happy to see you again!
|
DeviLLiciouS
Joined: Aug 18, 2008
Posts: 19
PM |
plank..
wat software r u using?
ur pics all look darn good!!  |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-25 21:56
