| Author |
K800 vs C902 pictures please |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-08-20 22:52:32, plankgatan wrote:
some words from Mobile review:
Well, it's not everyday I get to see something unique: an  fanboi quoting MR - in a positive way!!! (Usually poor old Eldar gets flamed so badly here at Esato that he would need to wear a fireman's gear.) I feel privileged, almost like watching the passing of Halley's comet or something...
BTW: I think that was one of the few good remarks about the C902 in MR's review.
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-08-21 09:49 ] |
|
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
eeehhh. i have critize that Sibirisk mother f""ker ONE time. (and thats about C905 sensor. etc).. he he
nothing else
_________________
I C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 09:55 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-21 10:52:37, plankgatan wrote:
eeehhh. i have critize that Sibirisk mother f""ker ONE time. (and thats about C905 sensor. etc).. he he
nothing else
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 09:55 ]
you might adress people in sweden by saying mother ******, but here on Esato we keep our bloody mouths shut, so i sugges you do the same
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
here's some low-light pics from the c902 & k800
c902
http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/458/dsc00278dp4.jpg
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/5150/dsc00380zq4.jpg
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4844/dsc00381kf4.jpg
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/1411/dsc00383vp3.jpg
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/9456/dsc00385jv4.jpg
k800
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y+ericsson&model=k800i+special
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k800i
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00095.jpg
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00096.jpg
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k800i
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k800i |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
I don't know what you guys think, but C902 takes far better pics then K850 in terms of color accuracy, and post processing. also C902 pics doesn't suffer too much from heavy purple fringing as K850 does.
the C902 first pic number1 posted shows that SE have already fixed the horrible red-to-pink issue that K850 possesses. i also see the same accuracy with G900 photos. seems like the new sony module used for C902 has better implementation than the ones found in K850's imx-020
10 years at Esato |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
qvga...i just kidding man
and yes. C902 produce better low light then K800. (i like my k800/k810 pictures...but C902 is more accurate)
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 11:32 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
of course we are talking about the fair situation when K800 have original camera driver. K800 with modded driver is completely different song for low light and night shots. I have no doubt that clash between modded K800 and C902 in very low light would be more painful for C902 than for K800. unfortunate we don't have opportunity to check this in identical light conditions (no user with both phones). maybe some day
|
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
On 2008-08-21 10:52:37, plankgatan wrote:
eeehhh. i have critize that Sibirisk mother f""ker ONE time. (and thats about C905 sensor. etc).. he he
nothing else
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 09:55 ]
Zip your mouth. There may be kids on this forums. |
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
On 2008-08-20 23:40:23, PzK wrote:
On 2008-08-20 20:43:30, number1 wrote:
If the c902 is the phone you want then buy it, but the screen & cam quality is roughly the same quality as the k800,
ROFL, that quote made me laugh. Do you have some sort of grudge against the c902? Because I cant believe you just compared the cameras between the 2 phones.
There's nothing wrong to compare this two cameras since the threadstarter is interested in these two phones. |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-20 22:52:32, plankgatan wrote:
you guys who say C702 have better camera then C902, please explain ????? (i dont know, but (sadly) i havnt seen so many sharp C702 pictures yet)
about the screen, i can tell C902 screen is crispy and have good brightness, (its even ok in sunshine).
ALL new more expensive phones have VERY good screens... i doubt Sonyericsson put in a dull screen on their new flagship.
some words from Mobile review:
C902 screen in darkness
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-20 22:12 ]
seriously WTH is that? the first and the last column are totally not being lighted
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
The backlight is not as bad as they'd photographed it to be. I should know, one of my friends has a C902.
|
DeviLLiciouS
Joined: Aug 18, 2008
Posts: 19
PM |
imatic,
i'm also having the same prob!!
i owned a K810i previously.. currently finding for a replacement but itz kinda hard coz K810i is a really good camera phone.. got my eye on C902 but i'm still not sure whether the picture quality is as good..
hopefully there will be someone kind enough ;p |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
NightBlade... of course its not. he just found something to complain about..he he.
(everyone who have use or own a C902 knows that the backlight is perfectley normal).
@DeviLLiciouS..........is this good enough
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-22 11:06 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
The k800i can produce good macros aswell
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y+ericsson&model=k800i+special |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
well, I don't see any photography area where old K800 can be ashamed by new C902 so it's only your choice. if you have money and you want new phone - buy C902, if you're looking for better camera only - it's not good direction because C902 will not give you nothing new which is worthy to spent money on it
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:45
