Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > K800 vs C902 pictures please

Previous  123 ... 91011  Next
Author K800 vs C902 pictures please
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-08-20 19:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Yes the C702 screen is better plus it does not have the awful ambient light sensor which i hate it makes screen far too dim. The C902 does looks flashy and cool though and having today played with one in a store it is a sexy phone though screen is too small. And also when i was viewing photos on C902 strange lines were moving over the pics and blurring the photos more as they were loading. Anyone noticed this.
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2008-08-20 20:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
If the c902 is the phone you want then buy it, but the screen & cam quality is roughly the same quality as the k800, the screen is the same size & like the k800 cam in anything other than daylight
The pics are oil
Painted smears.
Sky Hi
Xperia Mini Pro Black
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
Posts: 106
PM
Posted: 2008-08-20 21:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
DON'T DO IT! You will be doomed for ever!
10 years non-stop SE user:
T300->K500->K700->K800->K810->C905->Xperia Mini
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-08-20 21:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
don't scare user 843 weared flameproof armor some time ago but nothing happened, I believe that number1 is safe too
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2008-08-20 21:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i wonder how long i'm safe for before this thread gets spammed with a tonne of resized pics trying to show the quality of the c902's cam.
datx
G900 Brown
Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 130
From: Portugal
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-08-20 22:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I think it's great stuff when resized pics look good..

Something my nokia 5300 can't do even when resized to 320x240 ahah

Cheers
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2008-08-20 22:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
you guys who say C702 have better camera then C902, please explain ????? (i dont know, but (sadly) i havnt seen so many sharp C702 pictures yet)


about the screen, i can tell C902 screen is crispy and have good brightness, (its even ok in sunshine).

ALL new more expensive phones have VERY good screens...i doubt Sonyericsson put in a dull screen on their new flagship.

some words from Mobile review:


C902 screen in darkness


_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-20 22:12 ]
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2008-08-20 23:33
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I never said there was anything wrong with the screen just its too small.
The c702's pics are perfectly sharp they look sharper than the c902s because the post-processing isnt as strong even lower light pics are still quite sharp while the c902 turns them into oilpaintings

C702 Lowish light
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13934

C702 full lowlight not sharp but its not a complete smear
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13935
PzK
C902 Black
Joined: Jan 31, 2007
Posts: 35
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-08-20 23:40
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-08-20 20:43:30, number1 wrote:
If the c902 is the phone you want then buy it, but the screen & cam quality is roughly the same quality as the k800,


ROFL, that quote made me laugh. Do you have some sort of grudge against the c902? Because I cant believe you just compared the cameras between the 2 phones.
imaticx
C901 Silver
Joined: Nov 09, 2006
Posts: 107
From: Croatia
PM
Posted: 2008-08-20 23:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
look, c702 doesn interesting me. I might buy c902, but i need to know difference between photos of K800 and c902, especially in dark (i see photos at day is beautiful and better than k800)

so, please post same picture at night from k800 and c902

thanks
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2008-08-20 23:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Why not the k800 & c902 both have heavy post-processing making pic quality the same, the c902 does have better whitebalance though.
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-08-21 01:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-08-20 23:33:32, number1 wrote:
I never said there was anything wrong with the screen just its too small.


Small is relative. But the color reproduction is really miles better in C902.
I've seen C902 screen and it's so far, the best in bright environments (better than K660) coz light sensor doesn't work in bright environments. If only it didn't have any light sensor, it'd be the best in any environment (K660 wins in this aspect).

My point is.. it can be small, but the very vivid color reproduction really pays it off.



_________________
Some people think they are credible enough to give others critics, compliments, and stuffs. LoL!

Err.. btw.. some of the people are really into double standard, too. LoL. They don't want to be criticized, but all the time criticizes. LoL. H-I-L-A

[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-08-21 00:39 ]
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
(i see photos at day is beautiful and better than k800)

uhh, here we go again. aren't your daylight pictures from K800 beautiful? aren't they sharp? you don't like colors? did you saw comparision of K800 and C902 pictures to say things like that? I didn't saw but I see something else - my pictures from K800 and pictures from C902 on this forum and to be honest I would like to see good reason to change my K800 to C902 because of camera

5MP over 3.2MP? well, no. small experiment by AbuBasim showed me that this doesn't mean much

better colors? no comparision = no proofs

light sensitivity? now we are talking about something! C902 sensitivity is higher. high ISO is better in C902 that's why night pictures are better and there's not much chroma noise on them but... both phones have potential to create much better very low light shots than they can. however only K800 can do this (modified driver) and C902 is awaiting for his chance
QVGA
Nokia Lumia 1020
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
wow that is some really terrible keyback light on C902
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
he he... you found a new thing to complain about... keep up the good work man.




he he
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 09:34 ]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 91011  Next
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic