| Author |
Samsung i8510 camera VS C905 camera |
yaniv84
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 71
PM |
i think that the Samsung i8510 win big time.
Samsung i8510 :
http://www.google.com/transla[....]html&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sl=ru&tl=en
905:
http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]sonyericsson-c905-camera.shtml |
|
|
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
how abt you take a look at these pics of c905 and thn make a decision
http://www.smape.com/en/revie[....]ony_Ericsson_C905-prev_en.html
Nokia N8 |
yaniv84
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 71
PM |
the link is not warking. |
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
sorry abt tht
just to go http://www.smape.com/en/
and u will c the review of c905
Nokia N8 |
yaniv84
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 71
PM |
On 2008-08-13 15:47:15, naveedaziz83 wrote:
sorry abt tht
just to go http://www.smape.com/en/
and u will c the review of c905
i saw that review & the 8510i is defenetliy much better in it pic quality
the C905 looks bad without vivid coluors & very soft picture. |
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
well IMO we cant compare the pics of innov8 and c905 in 2 different conditions .. c905 is in cloudy whereas innov8 is in bright daylight
the only way to compare the pic is by having them side-by-side and take pics in the same condition
till then, i think its not really fair to say tht innov8 produces better pics than c905
Nokia N8 |
adnansanni
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM |
On 2008-08-13 15:52:38, yaniv84 wrote:
On 2008-08-13 15:47:15, naveedaziz83 wrote:
sorry abt tht
just to go http://www.smape.com/en/
and u will c the review of c905
i saw that review & the 8510i is defenetliy much better in it pic quality
the C905 looks bad without vivid coluors & very soft picture.
That means elder was right? |
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
Maybe, but this is a first version of camera software in c905
Will be better 
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
here we go again. (been there, done that.....and i got the t-shirt)
|
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
On 2008-08-14 01:11:46, plankgatan wrote:
here we go again. (been there, done that.....and i got the t-shirt)
I know. I think everyone on Esato has come across your camera 'discussions'. |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-08-14 13:55:52, marty mcfly wrote:
On 2008-08-14 01:11:46, plankgatan wrote:
here we go again. (been there, done that.....and i got the t-shirt)
I know. I think everyone on Esato has come across your camera 'discussions'.
If anyone claims that a Samsung or Nokia camphone is better than SE's, they'll not hear the end of it once plankis gets started... But it's not really his fault. He is suffering from a serious disease.
|
adnansanni
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM |
lolz |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
Abu... you really funny. (strange, i never quote you with that sort of answers)
have anyone really seen (except for some lonely pictures on gsm arena) what Samsung actually can do.
now i mean flash, low light, night, indoor, etc ?? (i havnt. so until then i really cant see Samsung pictures is superior)
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-14 19:11 ] |
hgautam
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
LOL
Excuse me, but the night pics from samsung at mobile review are very bad. They are too blurrry and smooth. In fact so much that those pics are not worth the snaps.
Just wait till both the phones are released and a comparison is made with the final product in same conditions. As of yet, both perform equally good in my eyes. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-13 15:41
