Author |
Which format for listening to the music is better, MP3 or AAC |
aasimtom Joined: Jan 30, 2007 Posts: 165 From: United Kondom PM, WWW
|
Hi Guys,
I was wondering if there is any difference between the two formats based on quality and which one do you use yourself. Any thoughts.
Which format should I choose for putting my record collection on to my W980?
Regards
_________________
N95B --> W980
God,forgive me when I Whine.
[ This Message was edited by: aasimtom on 2008-08-13 13:16 ] |
|
Marc_SE Joined: Mar 30, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Around the way, UK PM, WWW
|
AAC is the more 'efficient' codec of the two.
Ripping at the same kbps rate with either should produce the same file size (output). Despite this, you should have better audio quality with the AAC.
In simple terms, you can rip at a lower kbps bitrate than you would normally use, choose AAC as your audio codec and be happy with the quality. The trade off is between sound quality and file size (as normal)
For testing purposes, just rip the same track with different codecs/bitrates and see which ones you prefer. |
carkitter Joined: Apr 29, 2005 Posts: > 500 From: Auckland, NZ PM |
Audio encoded as AAC can be used as soundtracks for VideoDJ, MP3 cannot.
|
tranced Joined: Jan 19, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland PM |
here's a comparison:
AAC vs MP3 on the K750
hope it helps
|
TeenInvader Joined: May 13, 2005 Posts: 398 From: South Africa - Jo'burg PM, WWW
|
I think another thing is that the playback quality depends on the player.
so if the player doesn't properly implement aac then it won't be as good as it is suppose to be.
and i think most player properly implement mp3 over aac.
http://www.myspace.com/teeninvader |
aasimtom Joined: Jan 30, 2007 Posts: 165 From: United Kondom PM, WWW
|
BRR
I have downloaded dBpoweramp and converting just one MP3 song and the same song from a CD (for testing purpose) to AAC and would listen to both MP3 and AAC (with different bitrates), and would let you all know of any difference.
But I am sure W980 would be good for AAC as well becuase it is at its best for MP3s in current Walkman series.
Regards
W980 X1 HBH DS220 ON Shure SE530
God, please forgive me when I Whine. |
afbug Joined: Jul 04, 2008 Posts: 25 PM |
AAC is the more efficent codec as highlighted but the trade off is that not all players support AAC. MP3 is pretty universal.
If all your gadgets can play AAC files, then I think AAC will be the better choice. |
adnansanni Joined: Dec 07, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Bangladesh PM |
I prefer mp3. Nowadays storage capacity isn't bad. So Normally i used 192kbps. In future, no matter any player i'll get, i'm sure atleast mp3 will support so i won't have to convert again. To me, mp3 sound quality is better then AAC. |
aasimtom Joined: Jan 30, 2007 Posts: 165 From: United Kondom PM, WWW
|
BRR
I guess AAC is becoming a standard in parallel with MP3s because nowadays every newly developed Music player does support both the formats at the same time.
But I have tried it for a couple of hours and played the same MP3 track again and again in conjunction with AAC and as a result (on the basis of my judgement) AAC does sound relatively or rather I should say slightly good and deep on W980 but again if your ears are on sensitive side.
Regards
W980 X1 HBH DS220 ON Shure SE530
God, please forgive me when I Whine. |
Dogmann Joined: Jan 29, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: London England PM |
Hi all,
Well personally i find AAC to give much better results as does using a higher rate as the lower the rate the less information there is to decode. All of my Music is converted from CD's and @256kbps AAC as i find this really gives a full and rich sound as well as a full soundstage. Really using low bit rates whilst giving you more room really does compromise the quality of what you hear. Especially now even 8GB cards are relatively inexpensive it seems silly to compromise the sound for the sake of space IMO.
Marc
_________________
Nokia E90,8GB SDHC, Seven, Tom Tom 6
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2008-08-13 20:32 ] |
KyleKlinsman Joined: Jan 23, 2008 Posts: 20 PM |
AAC is not so good... Listening to my near field monitors, LAME MP3 against AAC comparable settings sounds better.
But in the end, no matter wich codec you use, you always have to choose between filesize or quality.
Some rippers that use LAME are Easy CD-DA Extractor or J River Media Center.
Best settings for use with our cell phones are ABR 96 / ABR 128 for space saving, or VBR 4 or VBR 5 for quality.
Plus better compatibility with portable devices
[ This Message was edited by: KyleKlinsman on 2008-08-15 04:38 ]
[ This Message was edited by: KyleKlinsman on 2008-08-15 04:39 ] |
aldrinus Joined: Jan 16, 2005 Posts: > 500 From: Philippines PM |
mp3 utilizes a smaller footprint compared to aac at the expense of audio quality (bit rate - wise).. i believe that people prefers mp3 primarily because of this specific reason.. on the other hand, aac entails more space primarily because of quality.
one poster, and i do agree with the post, that mp3 gains advantage primarily because of universal compatibility with most players (not to mention, audio-playing cellphones)..
personally, i don't delve much on technicalities between these two formats.. to ensure optimum audio quality for my favorite tracks, i encode them via mp3 with a minimum of 128kbps bit rate..
just a thought, mates! cheers
|
max_wedge Joined: Aug 29, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Australia PM, WWW
|
you are right about avoiding low bitrates - this is the best way to ensure good quality,r egardless of codec.
However you are not correct about your first statement. It's actually the opposite. AAC can compress a file more for the same quality as mp3. So for example an AAC encoded at 96Kbps is roughly equivalent to an MP3 at 128Kbps. This means AAC tracks can be smaller in size than MP3 without sacrificing quality.
|
Fanofmodi Joined: Jan 03, 2008 Posts: 191 From: Hindustan PM |
Can someone tell me how to convert mp3 to aac. Is their any program and where can i download? Thanks |
aldrinus Joined: Jan 16, 2005 Posts: > 500 From: Philippines PM |
@max_wedge:
yo matey thanks for the information..
i actually researched about the technicalities of these two popular formats right after i posted that.. many thanks, mate!
i still prefer mp3 though
|
|