Author |
T300 not a good buy?? |
suppp__ Joined: Jan 04, 2003 Posts: 2 PM |
hey guys i phurcased a t300 last month.. i'm excited with da phone but some in here think it's a crappy bricky phone can any1 tell me if its a good buy? i'm so sad 'bout it |
|
geo2k Joined: Dec 26, 2002 Posts: 307 From: UK PM |
I think its a good buy, until the p800 comes out.
This post was posted from a T300 |
jellyellie Joined: Dec 27, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: England PM, WWW
|
it's the best
www.jellyellie.com |
jcpsad Joined: Oct 15, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM, WWW
|
for me T68i is still better than the T300...
www.photos.panelo.com www.panelo.com www.bilog.panelo.com www.pbalive.panelo.com |
Lopez Joined: Oct 18, 2002 Posts: 24 From: Linkoping, Sweden PM |
It's very much a matter of personal taste. I mean, how much do you use the phone, what do you use it for (besides calling), etc. And, what are you prepared to pay! It's no point comparing it to the P800, they are two completely different products.
I think it's a very nice phone, you get a lot of stuff for the money spent - even if the memory issues bug me a lot If you want to compare it with other products, try the Nokia 3510i. But, as I said, it all comes down to what you like. Each phone has its pros and cons.
|
jellyellie Joined: Dec 27, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: England PM, WWW
|
It is different for everyone, here is an example.
Person A: I think the T300 is rubbish
Person B: I think the T300 is cool
----------------------------------
Person C: I think that America is rubbish
Person D: I think that America is cool
But who are you going to listenin to? You're going to make your own decision, aren't you?
www.jellyellie.com |
geo2k Joined: Dec 26, 2002 Posts: 307 From: UK PM |
I wasnt comparing it to the p800, i just meant the T300 is good for me until i can get a p800
This post was posted from a T300 |
ynohtna Joined: Dec 27, 2002 Posts: 278 From: PH PM |
@geo
It is a good buy per se.
Sony Ericsson-good buy
Nokia-goodbye
Come on fellas.love our fellow SE users-be it low,mid or highend model as long as it is an SE Product.
This post was posted from a T68i |
Evilsummer Joined: Jan 16, 2002 Posts: 236 From: Gothenburg Sweden PM |
U get much for your money with the T300... Although the T68 is better... |
Lopez Joined: Oct 18, 2002 Posts: 24 From: Linkoping, Sweden PM |
Well, generally, when you spend more money, you get a better product. However, if you don't use bluetooth etc. and manage with less memory, the T300 is, maybe, a better phone. Then, of course, you could always discuss how it looks...
|
clark27 Joined: Jan 10, 2002 Posts: 141 From: Napoleon hik! PM |
For me I can rate that as 1 one of d best phne like my r520 :)
This post was posted from a Nokia |
bjarne1 Joined: Oct 07, 2002 Posts: 117 From: sweden PM |
I'll take B and C!
The T300 is good for that money. No better phone in that segment today. ths s55 is a little better and t68 maybe best, but depends on what you can do without.
T300 and s55 doesnt have syns capabilities for instance.
T300 no calender or BT.
[ This Message was edited by: bjarne1 on 2003-01-05 16:53 ] |
markus Joined: Dec 29, 2002 Posts: 14 PM |
I think the T68 is the absolutely best phone, but T300 is not a bad phone! It just has a few less features than T68.. But honestly how often do you use BT etc.. The only bad thing about T300 is its ugly design.. Other vise a good buy. (Love my T68)
This post was posted from a T68i |
gatevital Joined: Dec 01, 2002 Posts: 440 From: Bath England PM |
Looks are down to taste/personal perferance, am I the only person who thinks the nokia 7210 is ugly/over designed?
The t300 is very near spec wise to the t68i, no calendor, no voice dialing and no blutooth, though you can use the dba 10 for headsets.
Why can't I be happy with one phone? |
Magic Man Joined: Dec 17, 2002 Posts: 30 From: Wales. UK PM |
As said, it depends on what you want.
For me it is the best phone, I don't want BT or the calendar functions of the T68 but do want the excellent polyphonic tones and games.
In this respect the T300, at least for my requirements, is the better of the two.
As for Nokia, well... they all look the same to me...
BTW the T300 is not a brick, it's very small, only 5mm longer than a T68 |
|