Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > T300 not a good buy??

Author T300 not a good buy??
suppp__
T68 gold
Joined: Jan 04, 2003
Posts: 2
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 15:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
hey guys i phurcased a t300 last month.. i'm excited with da phone but some in here think it's a crappy bricky phone can any1 tell me if its a good buy? i'm so sad 'bout it
geo2k
T300
Joined: Dec 26, 2002
Posts: 307
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 15:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I think its a good buy, until the p800 comes out.

This post was posted from a T300

jellyellie
P1
Joined: Dec 27, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM, WWW
Posted: 2003-01-05 16:00
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
it's the best
www.jellyellie.com
jcpsad
W800
Joined: Oct 15, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2003-01-05 16:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
for me T68i is still better than the T300...
www.photos.panelo.com
www.panelo.com
www.bilog.panelo.com
www.pbalive.panelo.com
Lopez
T300
Joined: Oct 18, 2002
Posts: 24
From: Linkoping, Sweden
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 16:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
It's very much a matter of personal taste. I mean, how much do you use the phone, what do you use it for (besides calling), etc. And, what are you prepared to pay! It's no point comparing it to the P800, they are two completely different products.

I think it's a very nice phone, you get a lot of stuff for the money spent - even if the memory issues bug me a lot If you want to compare it with other products, try the Nokia 3510i. But, as I said, it all comes down to what you like. Each phone has its pros and cons.

jellyellie
P1
Joined: Dec 27, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM, WWW
Posted: 2003-01-05 16:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
It is different for everyone, here is an example.
Person A: I think the T300 is rubbish
Person B: I think the T300 is cool
----------------------------------
Person C: I think that America is rubbish
Person D: I think that America is cool

But who are you going to listenin to? You're going to make your own decision, aren't you?
www.jellyellie.com
geo2k
T300
Joined: Dec 26, 2002
Posts: 307
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 16:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I wasnt comparing it to the p800, i just meant the T300 is good for me until i can get a p800

This post was posted from a T300

ynohtna
W950 Blue
Joined: Dec 27, 2002
Posts: 278
From: PH
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 16:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@geo It is a good buy per se. Sony Ericsson-good buy Nokia-goodbye Come on fellas.love our fellow SE users-be it low,mid or highend model as long as it is an SE Product.

This post was posted from a T68i

Evilsummer
K750
Joined: Jan 16, 2002
Posts: 236
From: Gothenburg Sweden
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 17:18
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
U get much for your money with the T300... Although the T68 is better...
Lopez
T300
Joined: Oct 18, 2002
Posts: 24
From: Linkoping, Sweden
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 17:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Well, generally, when you spend more money, you get a better product. However, if you don't use bluetooth etc. and manage with less memory, the T300 is, maybe, a better phone. Then, of course, you could always discuss how it looks...
clark27
T68i mineral
Joined: Jan 10, 2002
Posts: 141
From: Napoleon hik!
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 17:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
For me I can rate that as 1 one of d best phne like my r520 :)

This post was posted from a Nokia

bjarne1
C510 Silver
Joined: Oct 07, 2002
Posts: 117
From: sweden
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 17:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'll take B and C!

The T300 is good for that money. No better phone in that segment today. ths s55 is a little better and t68 maybe best, but depends on what you can do without.
T300 and s55 doesnt have syns capabilities for instance.
T300 no calender or BT.



[ This Message was edited by: bjarne1 on 2003-01-05 16:53 ]
markus
T68 gold
Joined: Dec 29, 2002
Posts: 14
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 18:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I think the T68 is the absolutely best phone, but T300 is not a bad phone! It just has a few less features than T68.. But honestly how often do you use BT etc.. The only bad thing about T300 is its ugly design.. Other vise a good buy. (Love my T68)

This post was posted from a T68i

gatevital
Z600
Joined: Dec 01, 2002
Posts: 440
From: Bath England
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 21:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Looks are down to taste/personal perferance, am I the only person who thinks the nokia 7210 is ugly/over designed?

The t300 is very near spec wise to the t68i, no calendor, no voice dialing and no blutooth, though you can use the dba 10 for headsets.
Why can't I be happy with one phone?
Magic Man
T300
Joined: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: 30
From: Wales. UK
PM
Posted: 2003-01-05 21:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
As said, it depends on what you want.

For me it is the best phone, I don't want BT or the calendar functions of the T68 but do want the excellent polyphonic tones and games.

In this respect the T300, at least for my requirements, is the better of the two.

As for Nokia, well... they all look the same to me...

BTW the T300 is not a brick, it's very small, only 5mm longer than a T68
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi