| Author |
C902 vs W890 =same crap |
ranzon
Joined: Nov 30, 2005
Posts: 41
From: western eu up
PM |
Just got the chance to sit down peace and quiet o compare my own C902 with friends W890, and the difference is that these are the exactly same phones, except for the 5mpix /3mpix camera and senseme or whatever crap it has..
Even got myselfe a w660i, and that phone has a much deeper bass than both of these phones.
I that how it should be in 2008?
And worst is yet to come.
Am really into musicphones, and to connect phone to the cars AUX is really a nice thing to do.
And even betteer if the goddamn Equalizer worked??
Works perfectly with headset connected, but when Aux cable is in, does not react to whatever mode i use it in.
Cant say soundquality in headset isnt that impressive either, W660 own those two phones so hard in my opinion..
Lucky me i didnt have to ruin myselfe when i had the toughts to buy this phone (W890)in a few weeks and hop it would satisfy me.
nop..
A real dissapointment for a musiclover.
Am i the only one with this sucha sad experience?
thoughts?
[ This Message was edited by: ranzon on 2008-08-05 11:35 ] |
|
|
iwantin
Joined: Dec 05, 2007
Posts: 74
From: Mon't Kiara
PM |
if they are exactly the same phones, what is there to compare??
it's like saying an apple = orange, EXCEPT for numerous color, texture, taste, and biological makeup differences. WTF??
[ This Message was edited by: iwantin on 2008-08-08 11:50 ] |
gola
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM |
Solution: dedicated mp3 player 
_________________
"Getting wisdom is the wisest thing you can do!"
Proverbs 4: 7
[ This Message was edited by: gola on 2008-08-08 12:20 ] |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Another solution is get a good Nokia Smartphone they always have good cracking sound. N81 8 giga byte or N95 8 giga byte. There are loads but generally lately Nokia have made better sounding music on their phones and not just the Xpress Music ones. Also cameras are better too on some. |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
What about the W980? People who've bought it so far love it and say it's got fantastic sound quality.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i use a pair of good headphones and have normal, good sound. (same as k850)
if you want some super sound, why in h@ll do you buy a cell phone ????
(what did you expect, some super sonic bass with super high volyme)
buy a Sony Walkman player or a Apple Touch.
and no, its different between w890 and c902.
c902 is more solid
it have much better camera & video quality
it have face detection
it have Photo flash
it have geo tag
it have google map
it have new Web browser
its more beatiful in my oppinion, (they dosent look the same at all)
it have stronger CPU
it have bigger internal memory (runs more smothly)
its a real high end phone with fresh new design.
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-09 08:29 ] |
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
I'm satisfied with my k850i r1f035 with photo and with sound |
Fanofmodi
Joined: Jan 03, 2008
Posts: 191
From: Hindustan
PM |
Same crap? WTF none of them are crap. If u think the screen size and slim they are same. But every thing else is different. Sound is great in both but i dont know how your ears are.
Hell is empty,
All the devils are here.
K750>W800>W810>W850>J100>P900>K790>M600>K800>W880>K810>W580>K850>W890>C902. |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
If you're into music phones that connect to cars, how about buying the W980 which has an FM transmitter that uses RDS to transmit the artist data from the phone to the car and also has BT Stereo A2DP to connect with too.
Both C902 and W890 (and also W980) can be used in Mass Storage Device or Media Transfer mode with the SE USB cable if your headunit has a USB input.
|
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-08-08 19:11:53, plankgatan wrote:
i use a pair of good headphones and have normal, good sound. (same as k850)
if you want some super sound, why in h@ll do you buy a cell phone ????
(what did you expect, some super sonic bass with super high volyme)
buy a Sony Walkman player or a Apple Touch.
and no, its different between w890 and c902.
c902 is more solid
it have much better camera & video quality
it have face detection
it have Photo flash
it have geo tag
it have google map
it have new Web browser
its more beatiful in my oppinion, (they dosent look the same at all)
it have stronger CPU
it have bigger internal memory (runs more smothly)
its a real high end phone with fresh new design.
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
I dont know for sure, but according to jbenchmark:
c902:
CPU Class : ARM9
CPU MHz : 170 MHz
JVM Type : AOT
w890:
CPU Class : ARM9
CPU MHz : 185 MHz
JVM Type : AOT
And you almost made me laugh when you wrote geotag, it haven't got a GPS for gods sake?!
And btw, I don't count c902 as a highend phone. It lacks to many features that should be in it, if it's going to be called highend. |
surajalok
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Posts: 45
PM |
arent se's 8/9 hundred series highend.
|
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
Yes they are. I don't think you can seriously call a 5.0Mp camphone mid range even in 2008. No argument here that K850i/C902/G900 are lacking in spec compared to their Nokia/Samsung competition. 
|
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-08-09 12:54:02, carkitter wrote:
Yes they are. I don't think you can seriously call a 5.0Mp camphone mid range even in 2008. No argument here that K850i/C902/G900 are lacking in spec compared to their Nokia/Samsung competition.
You mean that if the phone says 5mp it is automatically high-end? |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-08-09 10:54:08, xironghostx wrote:
And you almost made me laugh when you wrote geotag, it haven't got a GPS for gods sake?!
It doesn't need a GPS to be able to geotag photos.
|
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-08-09 13:13:51, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-08-09 10:54:08, xironghostx wrote:
And you almost made me laugh when you wrote geotag, it haven't got a GPS for gods sake?!
It doesn't need a GPS to be able to geotag photos.
It uses triangulating via gsm network? |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-05 12:32
